[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516893
]
Stanislaw Osinski commented on LUCENE-966:
--
When digging deeper into the issues of compatibility with the or
is it just me, or does it seem like the base class versions of
getVersion(), isOptimized(), and isCurrent() in IndexReader should all
throw UnsupportedOperationException?
(it seems like ideally they should abstract, but that ship/API has sailed)
: This patch fixes ParallelReader similar to LUCE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Stanislaw Osinski updated LUCENE-966:
-
Attachment: jflex-analyzer-r561693-compatibility.txt
A patch for better compatibility wit
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
To whom it may engage...
This is an automated request, but not an unsolicited one. For
more information please visit http://gump.apache.org/nagged.html,
and/or contact the folk at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Project lucene-java has an issue affecting its community integration.
This issue affects
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516945
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-967:
---
> Also, I think the addition of printing of elapsed time is re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-967:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-967.take3.patch
> Add "tokenize documents only" task to contrib/benc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516996
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-971:
---
This looks great!
One alternate approach here would be to cre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12516997
]
Steven Parkes commented on LUCENE-971:
--
I can look at what it would take to avoid the line file ... but ... what
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517003
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-966:
---
Oddly, the patch for TestStandardAnalyzer failed to apply for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517007
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-971:
---
> I can look at what it would take to avoid the line file ...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517031
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-967:
Thanks for fixing this Michael, looks perfect to me now.
> Add "tokenize do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517035
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-967:
---
Thank you for reviewing! I will commit shortly.
> Add "token
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517048
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-971:
Mmm... an additional advantage of this is not needing to extract
the entire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-971?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517047
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-971:
> But, this is the case regardless of which approach we use (ie, both
> appr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-967?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-967.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available] (was: [Patch Available
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch updated LUCENE-743:
-
Attachment: lucene-743.patch
Now, after LUCENE-781, LUCENE-970 and LUCENE-832 are committed, I up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-743?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517087
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-743:
--
I ran some quick performance tests with this patch:
1) The test opens a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-966?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12517097
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-966:
The search quality test failure can be caused by the standard
analyzer gene
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-969?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-969:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-969.take2.patch
Updated patch based on recent commits; fixed up the
20 matches
Mail list logo
