Hi,
I am working with demo and I am displaying the search results as :
Hits ht = is.search(q);
for (int i = 0; i <= ht.length(); i++) {
Document hitDoc = ht.doc(i);
queryResult.add(hitDoc.getField("name").toString() + "~"
+ hitDoc.getField("date").toString());
System.out.println(que
Hi,
I am having lucene-core-2.2.0.jar in my CLASSPATH. I do NOT see the method
setRAMBufferSizeMB method and the field DEFAULT_RAM_BUFFER_SIZE_MB missing
from IndexWriter class. I looked into the source also and sure enough, these
items do not exist.
Is this a download issue ?
Regards,
Nags.
Hi,
These are new APIs, available only in the unreleased trunk (2.3-dev) version
of Lucene.
They are not present in 2.2.
You can pull the nightly trunk build JAR from here:
http://lucene.zones.apache.org:8080/hudson/job/Lucene-Nightly/290/artifact/artifacts/
(that's this AM's build). Bu
oh ! I saw them in the javadoc so I got confused.
Thanks, Michael.
Regards,
Nags
On Dec 1, 2007 3:05 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> These are new APIs, available only in the unreleased trunk (2.3-dev)
> version
> of Lucene.
>
> They are not present in 2.2.
>
> You
If you call .stringValue() you should get just that string?
(You are now calling .toString()).
Mike
"Cauvery Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> I am working with demo and I am displaying the search results as :
>
> Hits ht = is.search(q);
> for (int i = 0; i <= ht.length(); i++) {
>
aaarghhh
You are right, Michael. Apologies for the stupid question.
Regards,
Nags.
On Dec 1, 2007 3:07 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> If you call .stringValue() you should get just that string?
>
> (You are now calling .toString()).
>
> Mike
>
> "Cauvery
Hi,
If we are able to create a Field using a BufferedReader, why not do the same
for the Term as well ?
I am trying to implement Lucene for a small set of source files, where the
entire source is the value for a Field named 'source'. Creating the field
was easy because there is a constructor for F
"Cauvery Developer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I can I use IndexWriter with createFlag set to false while
> updating. But, this sounds too "comprehensive".
Nomatter what if you are going to update a document, you will have to
open a writer for doing so (or, use a writer you already hav
Add unit test showing how to do a "live backup" of an index
---
Key: LUCENE-1073
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1073
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1073:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1073.patch
Attached patch that has a class (SnapshotDeletionPolic
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547413
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1073:
Woops, the new testcase is failing on windows ... I'll trac
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1073:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1073.take2.patch
Attached new patch to fix the intermittant failu
Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site Versions
section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html for releases.
Also, these questions are best asked on [EMAIL PROTECTED]
We try to keep java-dev for discussion of development of the actual
library.
Thanks!
-G
Michael Busch wrote:
They offer a free open-source license
(http://www.yourkit.com/purchase/index.jsp), however they ask to add a
reference to their website to the OS website.
Apache frowns on this. They should grant a license to you personally,
as an open-source developer, not to the project
Workaround in Searcher.java for gcj bug#15411 no longer needed
--
Key: LUCENE-1074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547490
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1074:
--
See also LUCENE-288
> Workaround in Searcher.java for gcj bug#15411 no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547492
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1074:
--
The target gcc release for this fix is 4.3.0, which is not yet released
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1073?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547496
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-1073:
---
Looks great, Mike!
Maybe we should add SnapshotDeletionPolicy to the
On Sat, 1 Dec 2007, Paul Elschot (JIRA) wrote:
Workaround in Searcher.java for gcj bug#15411 no longer needed
--
Key: LUCENE-1074
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1074
Proje
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547524
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-584:
--
{quote}
The patch is backwards compatible,
{quote}
I think that custom
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1019?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kyle Maxwell reopened LUCENE-1019:
--
Lucene Fields: [New, Patch Available]
Hi, after trying out the combined valuesource implementa
21 matches
Mail list logo
