[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547754
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1045:
--
Grant, any chance of you throwing in short support in there?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1072.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3
I just committed this. Thanks for rep
"Michael Busch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have a question about IndexWriter.close(false) and background
> merges. I was going to take a look at the code, but I'm sure that Mike
> knows the answer :-). Let's assume that a long background merge is
> going on and close(false) is called. Then th
"Michael Busch" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> > Hmm ... looking at the code, I think we should also check whether a
> > merge was aborted in mergeInit. It looks like there is a window from
> > when a merge is handed out until when it is inited such that if the
> > wr
Michael McCandless wrote:
> Hmm ... looking at the code, I think we should also check whether a
> merge was aborted in mergeInit. It looks like there is a window from
> when a merge is handed out until when it is inited such that if the
> writer is closed in that window it could result in incorre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547799
]
gsingers edited comment on LUCENE-935 at 12/3/07 3:49 AM:
-
{quote}
can you try out th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547803
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1045:
-
{quote}
short support
{quote}
FieldCache already has shorts suppo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547799
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-935:
{quote}
can you try out this patch
{quote}
BUILD FAILED
/lucen
3 dec 2007 kl. 08.35 skrev Michael Busch (JIRA):
we're deploying nightly snapshots
to the m2 snapshot repository.
Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,
but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?
--
karl
-
Possible thread hazard in IndexWriter.close(false)
--
Key: LUCENE-1075
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1075
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Index
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1075?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1075:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1075.patch
Attached patch. I'll commit in 1 or 2 days.
> Possib
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547901
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-584:
-
To go back to post #1 on this topic:
_"Sparsely populated =java.util.B
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547895
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
A few remarks on the lucene-584-take2 patch:
In the @deprecated javadoc a
Michael McCandless wrote:
>
> Well that certainly sounds spooky! You mean this test is using the
> one of IndexWriter's ctors that relies on IndexReader.indexExists() to
> decide whether to pass create=true?
>
Not sure, but I'll try to find out today.
-Michael
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547909
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-935:
--
Oups, I forgot to remove the lines that generate the checksums for the
a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1045:
Attachment: LUCENE-1045.patch
Drops ExtendedFieldCache, puts everything into FieldCache, a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547913
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-935:
OK, now we just need to figure out how best to incorporate it into n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547913
]
gsingers edited comment on LUCENE-935 at 12/3/07 9:38 AM:
-
OK, now we just need to fi
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site Versions
section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html for releases.
Unreleased stuff should only be linked to in a "developer" section of
the website. Right now the primary javadoc links on the we
On Dec 3, 2007, at 1:31 PM, Doug Cutting wrote:
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Right, the javadocs are for the nightly build. See the Site
Versions section of http://lucene.apache.org/java/docs/index.html
for releases.
Unreleased stuff should only be linked to in a "developer" section
of the
Grant Ingersoll wrote:
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/lucene/java-dev/42616?search_string=javadocs%20nightly%20build contains
the discussion on this from way back when.
In that discussion I said that, "links to nightly builds should be
confined to 'developer' portions of the site". Tha
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547950
]
Michael Busch commented on LUCENE-935:
--
generate-maven-artifacts still works fine if no m2.* properties are over
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547958
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
Mark, in the latest Matcher-2default.patch there is the
org.apache.lu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547959
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-935:
My cron job copies from the Hudson dir to p.a.o. Whereas the Hudson
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12547988
]
Mark Harwood commented on LUCENE-584:
-
I'm getting lost as to which patches we're considering here. I was looking
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548030
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-584:
-
In case there is a better name than Matcher for a Scorer without a score()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548053
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1045:
--
Actually, I'm not sure we should change it to an abstract class now...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548078
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1045:
-
With this latest patch, they will still be able to do that. I ma
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-1045:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> SortField.AUTO doesn't work with long
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548079
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1045:
--
> With this latest patch, they will still be able to do that.
Only if
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548088
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1045:
-
Yes. True. Here you and Doug finally had me convinced and now..
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1072?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael Busch reopened LUCENE-1072:
---
I'm seeing a similar issue when TokenStream.next() throws an
IOException (or a RuntimeException)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1039?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12548159
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1039:
--
Skimmed this very quickly - looks nice and clean to me!
Why is
Hi, do others also lose emails from the user list?
Not receiving back a response I sent to user list I checked the on-line
archive
and found that Michael already answered yesterday but I never got that,
reply,
and a few more. The dev list seems to work fine for me.
Do others see similar issues w
Karl Wettin wrote:
>
>
> Sorry if I've missed any discussion about it,
>
> but the snapshots still seems to depend on Clover?
>
Hi Karl,
no that has been fixed. There should not be any clover instrumentation
in the latest snapshots anymore.
-Michael
35 matches
Mail list logo
