[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1084:
---
Fix Version/s: 2.4
> increase default maxFieldLength?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559440#action_12559440
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1084:
+1
Users frequently trip up on t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1084:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> increase default maxFieldLength?
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-205?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559443#action_12559443
]
Vladimir Yuryev commented on LUCENE-205:
Thanks you for the attentiveness to so sma
I'd like to run an alg like this:
ResetSystemErase
{ "BuildIndex"
CreateIndex
{ "AddDocs" AddDoc > : 20
CloseIndex
}
RepSumByPrefRound BuildIndex
But in the report, for rec/s, I'd like to see the total BuildIndex
time divided by 200,000, ie, the net time per document to
I think you can do:
RepSumByPref AddDocs
And it will report on just that, for instance, in the standard.alg,
this is done inside the round to report out info on that rounds AddDocs.
I think you could even do it outside the round, just by substituting
BuildIndex for "AddDocs".
In general,
On Jan 16, 2008 1:25 PM, Michael McCandless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I'd like to run an alg like this:
>
> ResetSystemErase
> { "BuildIndex"
> CreateIndex
> { "AddDocs" AddDoc > : 20
> CloseIndex
> }
>
> RepSumByPrefRound BuildIndex
>
> But in the report, for rec/s, I'd
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559490#action_12559490
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1084:
-
Does this break back-compatibility if w
On Jan 16, 2008 3:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you can do:
>
> RepSumByPref AddDocs
>
> And it will report on just that, for instance, in the standard.alg,
> this is done inside the round to report out info on that rounds AddDocs.
>
> I think you could even do it out
On Jan 16, 2008, at 8:33 AM, Doron Cohen wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 3:29 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I think you can do:
RepSumByPref AddDocs
And it will report on just that, for instance, in the standard.alg,
this is done inside the round to report out info on that rounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll reassigned LUCENE-1133:
---
Assignee: Grant Ingersoll
> WikipediaTokenizer needs a way of not tokenizing certain
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1133:
Attachment: LUCENE-1133.patch
Here's a completely back-compatible (if there is such a thin
Doron Cohen wrote:
On Jan 16, 2008 1:25 PM, Michael McCandless
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
I'd like to run an alg like this:
ResetSystemErase
{ "BuildIndex"
CreateIndex
{ "AddDocs" AddDoc > : 20
CloseIndex
}
RepSumByPrefRound BuildIndex
But in the report, for rec/s
add ability to not count sub-task doLogic increment to contri/benchmark
---
Key: LUCENE-1136
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1136
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559549#action_12559549
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1084:
{quote}
Does this break back-com
Token type as BitSet: typeBits()
Key: LUCENE-1137
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Analysis
Reporter: Gra
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1137:
Attachment: LUCENE-1137.patch
Added get/setTypeBits() method and underlying storage and co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559583#action_12559583
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1084:
-
I don't know the answer to those questi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559588#action_12559588
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1137:
--
Gack! I recommended a bitset on Token previo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559589#action_12559589
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1137:
-
I see two problems with this patch:
1. Althoug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559595#action_12559595
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1137:
-
{quote}
The information encoded by BitS
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559606#action_12559606
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1137:
-
Never mind on the isClaimed() idea, I d
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559607#action_12559607
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1137:
--
If we go with the bitset (int or long!!!), "t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1137:
Attachment: LUCENE-1137.patch
Per feedback from Yonik, changes this to use an int. The cl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559637#action_12559637
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1137:
-
Looks like the constructors still take a BitSet
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1137?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1137:
Attachment: LUCENE-1137.patch
Let's try a patch that actually compiles
> Token type as Bi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1133?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Grant Ingersoll updated LUCENE-1133:
Attachment: LUCENE_1133_1137.patch
Here's a patch that also includes LUCENE-1137 and sets
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivek commented on LUCENE-390:
--
Is there any plan to incorporate this IndexAccessor package in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivek commented on LUCENE-390:
--
Is there any plan to incorporate this IndexAccessor package in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivash edited comment on LUCENE-390 at 1/16/08 2:33 PM:
---
Is there any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-390?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559694#action_12559694
]
vivash edited comment on LUCENE-390 at 1/16/08 2:33 PM:
---
Is there any
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen reassigned LUCENE-1136:
---
Assignee: Doron Cohen
> add ability to not count sub-task doLogic increment to contri/benchm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1136?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-1136:
Attachment: lucene-1136.patch
This patch should do it.
Give it a try Mike?
(patch also fixing a m
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559730#action_12559730
]
Doug Cutting commented on LUCENE-1084:
--
This kind of limit is common on web search en
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1084?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559748#action_12559748
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1084:
-
An alternative to changing the default setting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559780#action_12559780
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-1050:
-
I'm getting an exception here, when usi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559795#action_12559795
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1050:
--
Grant: my take on this is that SpellChecker.clearInde
SpellChecker.clearIndex calls unlock inappropriately
Key: LUCENE-1138
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1138
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
Components: co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1050?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559803#action_12559803
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1050:
--
FYI, I just verified that Solr does this corr
: If I remember right, the file format changed in 2.1, such that 2.0 could not
: read a 2.1 index.
that is totally within the bounds of the compatibility statement...
http://wiki.apache.org/lucene-java/BackwardsCompatibility
>>Note that older releases are never guaranteed to be able to read inde
40 matches
Mail list logo
