Op Saturday 09 February 2008 02:00:02 schreef robert engels:
> Curious... on things like this, is it really worth adding (and
> maintaining) Lucene's own sort, just to achieve a 1.5 % performance
> increase. It is almost doubtful that you can even measure an
> improvement at that level, given
robert engels wrote:
> Curious... on things like this, is it really worth adding (and
> maintaining) Lucene's own sort, just to achieve a 1.5 % performance
> increase. It is almost doubtful that you can even measure an improvement
> at that level, given all of the variables you can't control.
>
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567306#action_12567306
]
Eks Dev commented on LUCENE-1169:
-
Thank for explaining it!
So we have now classes implem
I also agree w/ Robert and Michael, here. While DocsWriter is really
effective, it is very complicated to follow and it makes debugging and
maintenance much harder.
-Grant
On Feb 9, 2008, at 5:03 AM, Michael Busch wrote:
robert engels wrote:
Curious... on things like this, is it really w
On Feb 8, 2008 8:00 PM, robert engels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Curious... on things like this, is it really worth adding (and
> maintaining) Lucene's own sort,
Unfortunately, Java's sort on Object[] is a mergeSort, and they
allocate an axillary array to support that.
Mike's latest tests show a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-325?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-325:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-325.patch
Attached patch. All tests pass. I plan to commit in a da
I agree, there comes a point where the cost of added complexity is not
worth the gains, on balance. Making that tradeoff is not easy.
I don't think the patch in LUCENE-1172 crosses that line: a 1.6% (4.1%
on small docs) top line gain is still a sizable gain.
The profiler points to many other sm
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1172?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567326#action_12567326
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1172:
The above numbers were with the f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1169?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567351#action_12567351
]
Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1169:
--
Some of the bugs caused by this skipTo() beha
Hi Ning,
In continuation with our offline conversation, here is a public
expression of interest in your work and a description of our work. Sorry
for the length in advance and I hope that the folk will be able to
collaborate and/or share experiences and/or give us some pointers...
1) We are
10 matches
Mail list logo
