[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588953#action_12588953
]
Antony Bowesman commented on LUCENE-1150:
-
The original tokenImage String array fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-1150:
You're right. I'll put that back as well, and port to 2.3.2.
> The token types of th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1150.
Resolution: Fixed
> The token types of the standard tokenizer is not accessible
>
Hi all,
After compiling I receive the following message:
[javac] Note: file.java uses unchecked or unsafe operations.
[javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details.
But I haven't found how to do it. Could you help me on that?
thanks in advance
--
Felipe.
---
I have this form my project "panFMP" in my build.xml, which uses heavy java
5 features:
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tue
On Apr 13, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
I think the major difference is locality? In a compound file, you
have to seek "far away" to reach the prx & skip data (if they are
separate).
There's another item worth mentioning, something that Doug, Grant and
I discussed when this
On Apr 13, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote:
In fact, RawPosting "objects" aren't even malloc'd individually --
they're
assigned memory chunks by a custom MemoryPool object (which *does*
have to
maintain awareness of alignment issues). You can't do this:
Right, it's that alignm
I understand that this might be better served on the user list, but
trying here first since the devs would know best.
When doing prefix queries in the Lucene 1.9x
There is a term limit of 1024 (configurable). We changed this to be
unlimited because of a domain problem.
The question is, doe
On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, robert engels wrote:
we use this for name searching, so that you might have
"engels r*"
the problem being that the phrase "engels r" is quite unique, but
the term r* is not unique at all.
Anything improve the handling of this in the current lucene?
You coul
Hi friends,
I am very new to Lucene framework.
My requirement : 1. Creating indexes through lucene from oracle tables and
store it to another table.
2. Fuzzy search for Norwegian (multilingual)
Search example li
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think the prefix query finds
matching terms first and puts them in an array???
So if you have a numeric field, searching for 1* could give a near
infinite number - causing an OOM.
Causes me to think though... in most cases the number of unique names
11 matches
Mail list logo