[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1150) The token types of the standard tokenizer is not accessible

2008-04-15 Thread Antony Bowesman (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12588953#action_12588953 ] Antony Bowesman commented on LUCENE-1150: - The original tokenImage String array fr

[jira] Reopened: (LUCENE-1150) The token types of the standard tokenizer is not accessible

2008-04-15 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-1150: You're right. I'll put that back as well, and port to 2.3.2. > The token types of th

[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1150) The token types of the standard tokenizer is not accessible

2008-04-15 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1150. Resolution: Fixed > The token types of the standard tokenizer is not accessible >

How to add -Xlint:unchecked to build.xml

2008-04-15 Thread fsanchez
Hi all, After compiling I receive the following message: [javac] Note: file.java uses unchecked or unsafe operations. [javac] Note: Recompile with -Xlint:unchecked for details. But I haven't found how to do it. Could you help me on that? thanks in advance -- Felipe. ---

RE: How to add -Xlint:unchecked to build.xml

2008-04-15 Thread Uwe Schindler
I have this form my project "panFMP" in my build.xml, which uses heavy java 5 features: - Uwe Schindler H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen http://www.thetaphi.de eMail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tue

Re: Flexible indexing design

2008-04-15 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Apr 13, 2008, at 2:35 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: I think the major difference is locality? In a compound file, you have to seek "far away" to reach the prx & skip data (if they are separate). There's another item worth mentioning, something that Doug, Grant and I discussed when this

Re: Pooling of posting objects in DocumentsWriter

2008-04-15 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Apr 13, 2008, at 2:28 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: In fact, RawPosting "objects" aren't even malloc'd individually -- they're assigned memory chunks by a custom MemoryPool object (which *does* have to maintain awareness of alignment issues). You can't do this: Right, it's that alignm

prefix query help ?

2008-04-15 Thread robert engels
I understand that this might be better served on the user list, but trying here first since the devs would know best. When doing prefix queries in the Lucene 1.9x There is a term limit of 1024 (configurable). We changed this to be unlimited because of a domain problem. The question is, doe

Re: prefix query help ?

2008-04-15 Thread Marvin Humphrey
On Apr 15, 2008, at 4:07 PM, robert engels wrote: we use this for name searching, so that you might have "engels r*" the problem being that the phrase "engels r" is quite unique, but the term r* is not unique at all. Anything improve the handling of this in the current lucene? You coul

Lucene - multilingual Metadata Search in DB

2008-04-15 Thread vaswin
Hi friends, I am very new to Lucene framework. My requirement : 1. Creating indexes through lucene from oracle tables and store it to another table. 2. Fuzzy search for Norwegian (multilingual) Search example li

Re: prefix query help ?

2008-04-15 Thread robert engels
Please correct me if I am wrong, but I think the prefix query finds matching terms first and puts them in an array??? So if you have a numeric field, searching for 1* could give a near infinite number - causing an OOM. Causes me to think though... in most cases the number of unique names