add IndexCommit.getTimestamp method
---
Key: LUCENE-1375
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1375
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Index
Affects Versions:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628290#action_12628290
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1375:
Changes are trivial; I plan to co
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1375?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1375.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 691952.
> add IndexCommit.getTimestamp metho
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1376:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1376.patch
Attached patch. I will commit shortly.
> sometimes i
sometimes if a BG merge hits an exception, optimize() will fail to forward the
exception
Key: LUCENE-1376
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1376
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1369:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> Eliminate unnecessary uses of Hashtable and Vec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1369?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628306#action_12628306
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1369:
This patch looks good, thanks DM!
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628308#action_12628308
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1126:
{quote}
One solution would be to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1376?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1376.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 691964.
> sometimes if a BG merge hits an ex
Right, but that's sort of a hassle :)
I'll see what I can do.
4 sep 2008 kl. 04.36 skrev Grant Ingersoll:
Or just remove the generics, right?
On Sep 3, 2008, at 5:09 PM, Karl Wettin (JIRA) wrote:
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1320?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.i
On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:43 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
Hi
The COMPANY rule in StandardTokenizer is defined like this:
// Company names like AT&T and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
COMPANY= {ALPHA} ("&"|"@") {ALPHA}
While this works perfect for AT&T and [EMAIL PROTECTED], it doesn't work
well for strings li
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628331#action_12628331
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1372:
-
Hey Paul,
I agree that your patch is more intu
On Wed, Sep 3, 2008 at 6:50 PM, Jason Rutherglen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also think it's got a
> lot of things now which makes integration difficult to do properly.
I agree, and that's why the major bump in version number rather than
minor - we recognize that some features will need some am
Hi Yonik,
I found the basic integration with SOLR and Ocean to be fairly
straightforward, the https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-567
patch is key to that. SOLR just needs an optimistic concurrency
update handler and most of the functionality would work. I guess the
problem would be, remo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628348#action_12628348
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1344:
Nicolas, does this mean we need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1131?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628355#action_12628355
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1131:
--
I think so - applies and compiles.
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628368#action_12628368
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1126:
-
{quote}
Could we, alternatively, modify the pat
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1344?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628370#action_12628370
]
Nicolas Lalevée commented on LUCENE-1344:
-
bq. Nicolas, does this mean we need to
>> If I had to choose, this sounds reasonable.
Which of the two sound reasonable: (1) or (2)?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 4, 2008, at 2:43 AM, Shai Erera wrote:
>
> Hi
>>
>> The COMPANY rule in StandardTokenizer is defined like this:
>>
>
Sorry, 2. I realized after I sent it that my last sentence in the
reply was ambiguous.
On Sep 4, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Shai Erera wrote:
>> If I had to choose, this sounds reasonable.
Which of the two sound reasonable: (1) or (2)?
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 3:47 PM, Grant Ingersoll
<[EMAIL PROT
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628387#action_12628387
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1126:
bq. I'll shortly provide a redone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Steven Rowe updated LUCENE-1126:
Attachment: LUCENE-1126.patch
Refreshed original patch to include the Thai range {{[\u0e00-\u0e59]
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628406#action_12628406
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1126:
Steven, it looks like you ran JFl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628424#action_12628424
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-1126:
-
bq. Steven, it looks like you ran JFlex with a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628428#action_12628428
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1126:
Steven, it's OK I can regen; I ju
Add HTMLStripReader and WordDelimiterFilter from SOLR
-
Key: LUCENE-1377
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1377
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Comp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1126?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1126.
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision 692211.
Thanks Steven!
> Simplify StandardT
: Contrib lacks many requirements of core code - it can be java 1.5, it doesn't
: have to be backward compatible, etc. Putting something in core ensures its
: treated as a Lucene first class citizen, stuff in contrib is not held to such
: strict standards.
"Contribs" as an idea lack those require
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628480#action_12628480
]
Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-1372:
Having a Document sorted last because it has "zeb
: Another important driver is the "out-of-the-box experience".
I honestly have no idea what an OOTB experience for Lucene-Java means ...
For Solr i understand, For Nutch i understand ... for a java library
The closest thing we can do to describing an OOTB experience is making a
good demo
: My thought was to move SSS to core as a step towards
: making it the default, if and when there is more evidence it is
: better than current default - it just felt right as a cautious
: step - I mean first move it to core so that it is more exposed
If people really want to make SSS the default
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628496#action_12628496
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1372:
-
Ah, but right now, the documentation will tell
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628509#action_12628509
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1372:
--
bq. Right now it looks blatantly silly at the present
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628513#action_12628513
]
Paul Smith commented on LUCENE-1372:
bq. I'm not following this argument. Will it be l
: SOLR has two classes HTMLStripReader and WordDelimiterFilter which are
: very useful for a wide variety of use cases. It would be good to place
: them into core Lucene.
FWIW: Just about every concrete TokenFilter and Tokeinzer in Solr's code
base could and probably should be promoted up int
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1372?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628555#action_12628555
]
Hoss Man commented on LUCENE-1372:
--
bq. We'd sort the list of attributes so that it would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1373?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628563#action_12628563
]
marklassau edited comment on LUCENE-1373 at 9/4/08 11:13 PM:
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628568#action_12628568
]
Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1151:
-
Michael,
Great work. I am glad we are moving to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1151?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12628573#action_12628573
]
Mark Lassau commented on LUCENE-1151:
-
I love the solution you have come up with, but
39 matches
Mail list logo
