Le 19 sept. 08 à 15:21, Grant Ingersoll a écrit :
FWIW, here's a simple bash function to do it too:
function sign-artifacts()
{
gpg --armor --output $1-$2.pom.asc --detach-sig $1-$2.pom
if [ -f $1-$2-javadoc.jar ]; then
gpg --armor --output $1-$2-javadoc.jar.asc --detach-sig $1
Le 19 sept. 08 à 23:08, Gunnar Wagenknecht a écrit :
Hi Lucene Developers,
Issue 1344 requests to make the Lucene JAR an OSGi bundle. The
approach
proposed is to add the OSGi specific meta data into the MANIFEST.MF of
the existing Maven artifacts.
I prepared a patch which proposes a differ
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1396?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1396.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.9
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Nicolas Lalevée schrieb:
> the classpath of Lucene is so simple (no dependency at all),
Unfortunately, it's not. Some exported packages are split across
bundles. This makes it tough to manage. I wish it would be as easy as
using BND to simply generate the manifests for the existing jars. But it
do
This part is indeed quite tricky... I'll try to take a stab at it.
Paul Elschot wrote:
Op Friday 19 September 2008 17:05:29 schreef Michael McCandless:
Not quite, because how positions are encoded depends on whether any
payload appeared in that segment.
However, if 1) the input is a SegmentR
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633081#action_12633081
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1385:
---
I hit the bug yersterday again. Here the lo
Agreed, it's a system that is of value to a subset of cases.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:04 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving back to RDBMS model will be a big step backwards where we miss
> mulivalued fields and arbitrary fields .
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:17 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633083#action_12633083
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1385:
---
By the way: The index was optimized after t
Hi!
I've a lucene document structured like:
Field: Text
name: George Bush
Sex: Male
Occupation: President of USA
Now I can have two types of queries:
Structured query:
name: George Bush AND Occupation: President
Unstructured Query:
George Bush AND President.
After parsing it will become, value:
Now I can have two types of queries:
Structured query:
name: George Bush AND Occupation: President
please don't remind us!
try asking this question on the [EMAIL PROTECTED] that
list is for usage related questions
ryan
Hi Ryan,
Apparently it's not because as far as I know Lucene doesn't support
this function and I am planning to develop it.
Anshul
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:04 PM, Ryan McKinley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Now I can have two types of queries:
>> Structured query:
>> name: George Bush AND
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633089#action_12633089
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1385:
OK I think I found the bug.
>Fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633091#action_12633091
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1385:
I have a test case that shows the
OK so I wrote yet another way to do the signing, in Python (which I'll
happily find any excuse to use ;) -- it prompts for your passphrase
and then recurses through the dist directory looking for artifacts to
sign:
import sys
import os
import subprocess
import getpass
def signFile(pwd, f
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633096#action_12633096
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1385:
---
bq. Is it possible that your indexing job t
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1385?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633097#action_12633097
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1385:
bq. I looked into the logs of th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1387?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12633102#action_12633102
]
Karl Wettin commented on LUCENE-1387:
-
bq. I'm struggling to get two of the existing t
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <
[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Moving back to RDBMS model will be a big step backwards where we miss
> mulivalued fields and arbitrary fields .
No one is suggesting to "lose" any of the virtues of the field based
indexing that Lucene pro
Sorry, I meant "loose" (replacing "lose")
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, J. Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Moving back to RDBMS model will be a big step backwards where we miss
>> mulivalued field
Please ignore the correction... "lose" is fine:-)
On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, J. Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Sorry, I meant "loose" (replacing "lose")
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 21, 2008 at 8:38 PM, J. Delgado <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:04 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള്
Add ReverseStringFilter
---
Key: LUCENE-1398
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1398
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: New Feature
Components: Analysis
Reporter: Koji Sekiguchi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1398?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Koji Sekiguchi updated LUCENE-1398:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1398.patch
Patch attached. The patch includes a new constructor of Prefix
22 matches
Mail list logo
