[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1410: --- Attachment: TestPFor2.java Paul, I'm eager to test pfor on real Lucene vInts. So I

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0

2008-10-03 Thread Grant Ingersoll
The docs in the downloaded tarball still refer to 2.4-dev. The doap.rdf file is (badly) out of date. On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: I've built the release artifacts, from revision 700430 on the 2.4 branch. These are the changes: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccan

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636658#action_12636658 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- Q: Can you add a method that figures out the

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636660#action_12636660 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- Q: I'm using fixed 6-bit frame size. Can you

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless
Ugh. I'll fix & re-spin. Mike Grant Ingersoll wrote: The docs in the downloaded tarball still refer to 2.4-dev. The doap.rdf file is (badly) out of date. On Sep 30, 2008, at 8:30 AM, Michael McCandless wrote: I've built the release artifacts, from revision 700430 on the 2.4 branch. T

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0

2008-10-03 Thread mark harwood
Hi Mike, Given the repackaging any chance you can sneak in 2 contrib fixes I added recently? Null pointer introduced to clients dropping in 2.4 upgrade - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=700815 Bug in fuzzy matching - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless
No problem Mark -- I'll backport & include them in the next spin. Mike mark harwood wrote: Hi Mike, Given the repackaging any chance you can sneak in 2 contrib fixes I added recently? Null pointer introduced to clients dropping in 2.4 upgrade - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revi

Re: [VOTE] Release Lucene 2.4.0

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless
OK let's try again! Let's start a new VOTE to release these artifacts (derived from svn rev 701445) as Lucene 2.4.0: http://people.apache.org/~mikemccand/staging-area/lucene2.4take3 Here's my vote: +1. Mike mark harwood wrote: Hi Mike, Given the repackaging any chance you can sneak

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636685#action_12636685 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1410: bq. A: PFor.getNumFrameBits() doe

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Otis Gospodnetic (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636686#action_12636686 ] Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1410: -- For people not intimately familiar wi

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636689#action_12636689 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1410: There's also this recent comparis

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636705#action_12636705 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- Q: We should look at the asm that's produced?

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636715#action_12636715 ] Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1410: {quote} Q: We should look at the

[jira] Updated: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Michael McCandless (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1410: --- Attachment: TestPFor2.java New TestPFor2 attached. I changed vInt -> int in the pri

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636730#action_12636730 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- The number of bits is not really informative,

[jira] Commented: (LUCENE-1410) PFOR implementation

2008-10-03 Thread Paul Elschot (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1410?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12636736#action_12636736 ] Paul Elschot commented on LUCENE-1410: -- I wrote: The number of bits is not really inf