Hi Steve, in fact the list
of terms returned is for user consumption. From every term is possible
with a link to activate a search on the term itself and access to
document.
Annales
cafe
Caf
zucche
Thanks
Federica
Steven A Rowe ha scritto:
On 4/7/2009 at 1:19 PM, Michael McCandless
On Tue, Apr 7, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Jason Rutherglen
jason.rutherg...@gmail.com wrote:
I think we should keep it simple, unless we discover real perf problems
with the current approach.
Simple is good, however the indexing performance will lag because we're back
to the indexing speed of pre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1590:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1590.patch
Here is the final patch. I added two tests (one for the bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696972#action_12696972
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1231:
bq. If you e.g. want to show 5
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1590:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
Stored-only fields automatically enable norms
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696994#action_12696994
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1590:
Patch looks good! All tests
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696971#action_12696971
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
I think DeleteByPercentTask.java
The omitTf comment is:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for
this field.
* pbNOTE/b: this is a dangerous option to enable.
* While it reduces storage space required in the index,
* it also means any query requiring positional
*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12696977#action_12696977
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1231:
-
I can share my design for doc loading,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697001#action_12697001
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1589:
{quote}
The deletes are coming
How about simply:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for this field.
*
* pbNOTE/b: While this option reduces storage space required in
the index,
* it also means any query requiring positional
* information, such as {...@link PhraseQuery} or
Yeah, you got my vote. I think this one actually felt a bit more
dangerous when it was just called omitTf().
Michael McCandless wrote:
How about simply:
/** Expert:
*
* If set, omit term freq, positions and payloads from postings for this field.
*
* pbNOTE/b: While this option reduces
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697024#action_12697024
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1590:
---
{quote}
Patch looks good! All tests pass.
OK I'll make this change in the pending patch on LUCENE-1561.
Mike
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 8:52 AM, Mark Miller markrmil...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, you got my vote. I think this one actually felt a bit more dangerous
when it was just called omitTf().
Michael McCandless wrote:
How about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697034#action_12697034
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1590:
bq. In principle the Field
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697052#action_12697052
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
I wonder if we should break out
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697057#action_12697057
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1539:
Is it also interesting to add extensions to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697061#action_12697061
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
That's actually what's done in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1231?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697076#action_12697076
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1231:
-
FWIW, I think priority for document
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697083#action_12697083
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
bq. maxScore is only tracked in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697088#action_12697088
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1539:
Enabling bzip compression sounds
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697117#action_12697117
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1539:
bq. Can you open a new issue?
Will do.
Improve
Enable bzip compression in benchmark
Key: LUCENE-1591
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: contrib/benchmark
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697122#action_12697122
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
Right ... so basically we're talking about
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697124#action_12697124
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
Sounds right! Wanna update the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697130#action_12697130
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1575:
of course !
Refactoring Lucene collectors
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697143#action_12697143
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
I'm hitting this, when trying to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1575?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697152#action_12697152
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1575:
I came across another simple
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1561?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1561.
Resolution: Fixed
Maybe rename Field.omitTf, and strengthen the javadocs
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697164#action_12697164
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
So, after upgrading to xerces
Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
I propose augmenting fields file with two pointers (firstTerm,
lastTerm) for each field. That reduces range we need to search, and
instead of comparing Terms we
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
I propose augmenting fields file with two pointers (firstTerm,
lastTerm) for each
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697185#action_12697185
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1284:
--
Felipe:
I took another look at this.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1284?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697208#action_12697208
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on LUCENE-1284:
--
One more for Felipe.
Is there a page
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 00:14, Michael McCandless
luc...@mikemccandless.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2009 at 3:46 PM, Earwin Burrfoot ear...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, when we're seeking a given Term, it does a binary search
across all term space, including terms belonging to other fields.
I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jason Rutherglen updated LUCENE-1539:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Above mentioned issues fixed.
It seems a bit awkward
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1313?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697226#action_12697226
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-1313:
--
{quote} Still, it's synthetic. If you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1590?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697238#action_12697238
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1590:
---
bq. Since FieldInfos is per-segment, one
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1591?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=12697233#action_12697233
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1591:
After some iterations on
Also, on the other topic - how hard is it to boost
TermEnum.skipTo(term) speed to IndexReader.terms(term) level? Would be
nice for TrieRangeFilter and probably some other filters.
I think all that's needed is to implement SegmentTermEnum.skipTo,
calling something like tis.terms(Term) but
On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 02:01, Uwe Schindler u...@thetaphi.de wrote:
Also, on the other topic - how hard is it to boost
TermEnum.skipTo(term) speed to IndexReader.terms(term) level? Would be
nice for TrieRangeFilter and probably some other filters.
I think all that's needed is to implement
41 matches
Mail list logo
