> Just to throw something out, the new Token API is not very consumable in my
> experience. The old one was very intuitive and very easy to follow the code.
>
> I've had to refigure out what the heck was going on with the new one more
> than once now. Writing some example code with it is hard to fo
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719242#action_12719242
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1673:
---
I am currently preparing a first patch for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719243#action_12719243
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1630:
If that's agreed, then I'll do it and put a NOTE
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719246#action_12719246
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1673:
---
Here my own thoughts:
bq. But the latter c
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1539:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1539.patch
Attached new patch; fixed a bunch of silly issues (eg
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719246#action_12719246
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1673 at 6/14/09 4:03 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719246#action_12719246
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1673 at 6/14/09 4:05 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1407?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1407.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Simon!
> Refactor Searchable to not have RMI Remote depe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1589?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1589:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 2.9)
3.1
Moving out.
> IndexWriter.addI
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1677.
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove GCJ IndexReader specializations
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719253#action_12719253
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1677:
Is there a reason why test-tag does not depend on
Agreed. I've been bringing it up for a while now and made the same
comments when it was first introduced, but felt like the lone voice in
the wilderness on it and gave way [1], [2], [3]. Now that others are
writing/converting, I think it is worth revisiting.
That being said, I did just wr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719257#action_12719257
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1595:
-
I hope to look at this today. Shai, will this a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reassigned LUCENE-1571:
--
Assignee: Michael McCandless
> DistanceFilter problem with deleted documents
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719258#action_12719258
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1571:
Indeed, this bug looks like it's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719262#action_12719262
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-979:
Hmmm, I'm now getting
Exception in thread "main"
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-1571:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-1571.patch
OK I fixed it by switching to TermDocs(null), and also
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless reopened LUCENE-979:
---
Woops, I'll fix the build.xml & remove the old *.xml files from conf.
> Remove Deprecate
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719265#action_12719265
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1677:
bq. Is there a reason why test-ta
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719266#action_12719266
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1673:
--
bq. use SortField.PREFIX_ENCODED_INT for the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719270#action_12719270
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1673:
---
{quote}
bq. use SortField.PREFIX_ENCODED_IN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719272#action_12719272
]
patrick o'leary commented on LUCENE-1571:
-
patch looks good to me, tests passed as
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719273#action_12719273
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1673:
--
bq. But on the other hand SortField.INT is al
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-979?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-979.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Remove Deprecated Benchmarking Utilities from contrib/benchmark
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719287#action_12719287
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1595:
Yes, it will. Basically, DocMaker is now a concre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719290#action_12719290
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1571:
OK thanks for reviewing Patrick.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1571?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1571.
Resolution: Fixed
> DistanceFilter problem with deleted documents
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719291#action_12719291
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1595:
-
I'd love other opinions.
If we go with it, I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1673:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1673.patch
Here is a first patch, just for initial review of the API.
- Onl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719292#action_12719292
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1673 at 6/14/09 9:14 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1673?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719292#action_12719292
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1673 at 6/14/09 9:15 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1539?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-1539.
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks Jason!
> Improve Benchmark
> -
>
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719318#action_12719318
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1595:
Well ... depends on what are the "existing algori
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719322#action_12719322
]
Earwin Burrfoot commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
bq. But this can't replace ArabicAnalyz
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1488?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719342#action_12719342
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1488:
-
Earwin, I don't understand your question...
Th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719351#action_12719351
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1595:
-
bq. If we say that contrib in general does not
On 6/14/09 5:17 AM, Grant Ingersoll wrote:
Agreed. I've been bringing it up for a while now and made the same
comments when it was first introduced, but felt like the lone voice in
the wilderness on it and gave way [1], [2], [3]. Now that others are
writing/converting, I think it is worth rev
I don't know how I feel about rolling the new token api back.
I will say that I originally had no issue with it because I am very
excited about Lucene-1458.
At the same time though, I'm thinking Lucene-1458 is a very advanced
issue that will likely be for really expert usage (though I can see
Mark Miller wrote:
I don't know how I feel about rolling the new token api back.
I will say that I originally had no issue with it because I am very
excited about Lucene-1458.
At the same time though, I'm thinking Lucene-1458 is a very advanced
issue that will likely be for really expert usa
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1689:
Attachment: testCurrentBehavior.txt
this is just a patch with testcases showing the existing behav
See http://hudson.zones.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-trunk/859/changes
Changes:
[mikemccand] LUCENE-1539: add DeleteByPercent, FlushReader tasks, and ability
to open reader on a labelled commit point
[mikemccand] LUCENE-1571: fix LatLongDistanceFilter to respect deleted docs
[mikemccand] LUCEN
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719374#action_12719374
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1595:
-
{quote}Well ... depends on what are the "existi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1595?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719379#action_12719379
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1595:
bq. So its not like I'm sitting here saying this
The "old" API is deprecated, and therefore when we release 2.9 there might
be some people who'd think they should move away from it, to better prepare
for 3.0 (while in fact this many not be the case). Also, we should make sure
that when we remove all the deprecations, this will still exist (and
th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1677?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12719422#action_12719422
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-1677:
I think test-core is broken too ...
> Remove GCJ
45 matches
Mail list logo
