[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1887.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Revision: 813268
> o.a.l.messages should be moved to core
> -
I answered on java-user. I think it should be able to be done w/o
source code changes to Lucene.
Mike
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:39 AM, Dvora wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I'm coping a question I've asked in the Users lists, but I think it requires
> some patching effort, so maybe that list will be more
Hi,
I cross-post this here, Isabel Drost is managing the meetup. This time it is
more about Hadoop, but there is also a talk about the new Lucene 2.9 release
(presented by me). As far as I know, Simon Willnauer will also be there:
--
uwe, thanks for catching this!
can we do this too?
otherwise, analysis.tokenattributes shows up as being in contrib/analyzers :)
Index: build.xml
===
--- build.xml (revision 813385)
+++ build.xml (working copy)
@@ -337,7 +337,7 @
Hi again,
By the way, if somebody of the other involved developers want to provide me
some PPT Slides about the other new features in Lucene 2.9 (NRT, future
Flexible Indexing), I would be happy!
Uwe
> Uwe Schindler, Lucene 2.9 Developments: Numeric Search, Per-Segment- and
> Near-Real-Time Sear
Yes, correct, I will commit!
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Robert Muir [mailto:rcm...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 1:58 PM
> To: java-dev@lucene.apache.org
> Subject:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753598#action_12753598
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1370:
-
Chris, just a small comment:
{code}
if (outp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753621#action_12753621
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1370:
---
bq. even though it doesnt have to recompute
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753623#action_12753623
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1370:
-
Uwe, I see... i had not looked far enough yet t
Hi all,
I was wondering why the LowerCaseFilter is declared final? In my code, I
would like to extend it but apparently its not possible. I'm just
wondering why extending this type of class is considered evil?
Daniel Shane
-
See https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1753
In general, if you want to add functionality plug another filter into the
chain. At least the implementations should be final (next/incrementToken).
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@th
I forget, this known as "Decorator Pattern":
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Decorator_pattern
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schindler [mailto:u...@thetaphi.de]
> Sent: Thursday, Septe
When reviewing the new CharStream code added to Tokenizers, I found a
serious problem with backwards compatibility and other Tokenizers, that do
not override reset(CharStream).
The problem is, that e.g. CharTokenizer only overrides reset(Reader):
public void reset(Reader input) throws IOExcepti
I tested the attached patch, all tests still compile and work as exspected
(as CharStream extends Reader).
I think I should open an issue?
Uwe
-
Uwe Schindler
H.-H.-Meier-Allee 63, D-28213 Bremen
http://www.thetaphi.de
eMail: u...@thetaphi.de
> -Original Message-
> From: Uwe Schind
Yeah, lets open an issue and mark it blocker - I'll hold RC4 for it (was
just about to push it when I caught this email).
Uwe Schindler wrote:
> I tested the attached patch, all tests still compile and work as exspected
> (as CharStream extends Reader).
>
> I think I should open an issue?
>
> Uwe
Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom reset(Reader) method
---
Key: LUCENE-1906
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906
Project: Lucene - Java
Is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Description:
When reviewing the new CharStream code added to Tokenizers, I found a
serious pro
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753664#action_12753664
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
I will now check, if the change of the "inp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1906.patch
> Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom reset(Reade
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753666#action_12753666
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1906:
--
+1, this looks like the best fix.
> Problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753679#action_12753679
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
+1, good catch Uwe!
> Problem wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753687#action_12753687
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
Ready Uwe?
> Problem with CharStream and Token
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753689#action_12753689
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
bq. I will now check, if the change of the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: backwards-break.patch
Here is the patch for backwards-branch, that fails. It rever
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: (was: backwards-break.patch)
> Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers with cus
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: backwards-break.patch
Sorry, wrong patch, this one is correct. Other one was a eve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753709#action_12753709
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
One possibility to prevent this break would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1887?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753710#action_12753710
]
Luis Alves commented on LUCENE-1887:
I was not able to read the thread late yesterday
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753709#action_12753709
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1906 at 9/10/09 10:15 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753713#action_12753713
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
What about using an introspection cache again?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753715#action_12753715
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. (only some old Tokenizers not calling corre
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753718#action_12753718
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
bq. What about using an introspection cache
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753720#action_12753720
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
bq. We also have a not-in-CHANGES
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753722#action_12753722
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. Correct, this is always the problem with th
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753724#action_12753724
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
bq. Correct, this is always the p
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753725#action_12753725
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. A cache for what? I do not understand The
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1906.patch
Here the patch for core. Contrib is unchanged.
In principle jus
Hi,
After incrementToken() returns false, what are attribute getters supposed to
return? I thought that any such calls would be erroneous (the equivalent of
NullPointerExceptions), but
org.apache.lucene.index.DocInverterPerField.processFields() makes just such a
call at line 194.
Thanks,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753733#action_12753733
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
I'm still nervous about inserting
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753735#action_12753735
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
"instanceof" is one of the operators direct
I think it depends on the attribute?
In that case (a call to offsetAttribute.endOffset(), after
TokenStream.end() has been called), that method returns the final
offset increment. This is necessary so multi-valued fields keep the
right offsets (see https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-144
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Robert Muir updated LUCENE-1906:
Attachment: LUCENE-1906_contrib.patch
contrib changes.
> Problem with CharStream and Tokenizers w
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753738#action_12753738
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. I think breaking back compat here is OK?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753742#action_12753742
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-1906:
--
bq. "instanceof" is one of the operators dire
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753746#action_12753746
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. Hmmm, I had missed that 2.9 required a reco
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753750#action_12753750
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
bq. Yes, it's relatively fast, but it's per
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753750#action_12753750
]
Uwe Schindler edited comment on LUCENE-1906 at 9/10/09 11:24 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753751#action_12753751
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
bq. In my opinion, e.g. external language Token
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753762#action_12753762
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
bq. A recompile is only needed is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753766#action_12753766
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
bq. Maybe for 3.0 we can declare that this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753789#action_12753789
]
Chris Harris commented on LUCENE-1370:
--
{quote}
here i think you could save a clone()
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753795#action_12753795
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1370:
-
Chris, yeah I was thinking something like your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753798#action_12753798
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1370:
---
AttributeSource.State objects are unmodifia
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1906-bw.patch
LUCENE-1906.patch
Here the updated patches fo
http://lucene.apache.org/java/2_4_0/api/org/apache/lucene/queryParser/MultiFieldQueryParser.html#parse(java.lang.String[],
java.lang.String[], org.apache.lucene.analysis.Analyzer)
if I call the parse method inherited from QueryParser, multiple queries
don't seem supported. I'm trying to do a sea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753830#action_12753830
]
Robert Muir commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
uwe, i like your patch.
what was that Standard
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753834#action_12753834
]
Uwe Schindler commented on LUCENE-1906:
---
It was never used and seems to be a relict
I've been seeing strange behavior perhaps related to this? Where
sometimes a query is parsed and analyzed using Solr analyzers to
it's first clause fairly randomly, and other times the same
exact query is parsed and analyzed to the full correct query with all
clauses. It's so baffling I haven't rea
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753875#action_12753875
]
Mark Miller commented on LUCENE-1906:
-
I say we go with it - 'instance of' will have n
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753877#action_12753877
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1906:
Patch looks good Uwe!
> Problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753881#action_12753881
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1781:
So the anti-meridian test is expe
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1370?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Chris Harris updated LUCENE-1370:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1370.patch
Update patch to avoid an unnecessary State.clone(), as suggested b
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1896?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753892#action_12753892
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1896:
-
I kinda like the modification of queryNorm to g
sumOfSquared weights should be calculated as part of queryNorm
--
Key: LUCENE-1907
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1907
Project: Lucene - Java
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1907:
Attachment: LUCENE-1907.patch
> sumOfSquared weights should be calculated as part of queryNorm
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753906#action_12753906
]
Koji Sekiguchi commented on LUCENE-1906:
+1, patch looks good, thanks Uwe!
> Prob
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1907?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated LUCENE-1907:
Attachment: LUCENE-1907.patch
fix a test and improve a bit
> sumOfSquared weights should be calcu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753956#action_12753956
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-1781:
---
Not exactly.
testPrimeM() should be fixed by the n
Is there any means to monitor the I/O of lucene？
i.e. say i am searching in a FSDirectory, i wanna know the number of pages
read from disk
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Question-bout-I-O-monitoring-tp25394566p25394566.html
Sent from the Lucene - Java Developer mailing li
Try this:
http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/08/25/lucid-imagination-%C2%BB-lucid-gaze-for-lucene/
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:39 PM, edwardyf wrote:
>
> Is there any means to monitor the I/O of lucene？
> i.e. say i am searching in a FSDirectory, i wanna know the number of pages
> read from di
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753956#action_12753956
]
Bill Bell edited comment on LUCENE-1781 at 9/10/09 9:03 PM:
No
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753956#action_12753956
]
Bill Bell edited comment on LUCENE-1781 at 9/10/09 9:18 PM:
No
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: TestCartesian.java.patch
TestCartesian.java
This tests box prime meridien
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: (was: TestCartesian.java)
> Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEridian
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12753992#action_12753992
]
Bill Bell edited comment on LUCENE-1781 at 9/10/09 9:34 PM:
Po
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: (was: TestCases.diff)
> Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEridian
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: (was: LLRect.java)
> Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEridian
> ---
Thanks for the reply, just checked the Lucid Gaze package, it only collects
the stats at
function call level, no I/O stats
Ted Dunning wrote:
>
> Try this:
>
> http://lucene.grantingersoll.com/2009/08/25/lucid-imagination-%C2%BB-lucid-gaze-for-lucene/
>
> On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 8:39 PM, ed
If you're on a Mac or Solaris, dtrace will tell you everything you
want to know (and more.) If you're not familiar with dtrace,
iosnoop.d is a good start for this kind of measurement.
At Technorati, I used dtrace to build a trace file of all the read
requests made by a big lucene app, reco
unfortunately i am running a Red hat enterprise version, i am doing an
academic experiment which need number of disk I/Os.
I am now looking at SystemTap, which is said to be the iosnoop for linux.
thanks for the guide
Brian Pinkerton-2 wrote:
>
> If you're on a Mac or Solaris, dtrace will tel
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Summary: Backwards problems with CharStream and Tokenizers with custom
reset(Reader) method (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1906:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1906.patch
Some tweaks in JavaDocs. I committed this patch.
> Backwards pr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1906?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler resolved LUCENE-1906.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Committed revision: 813671
There may be some changes needed in Solr (corr
You can also integrate the results from iostat on an otherwise idle machine.
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 10:24 PM, edwardyf wrote:
>
> unfortunately i am running a Red hat enterprise version, i am doing an
> academic experiment which need number of disk I/Os.
>
> I am now looking at SystemTap, which
84 matches
Mail list logo
