[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754852#action_12754852
]
Jiri Kuhn commented on LUCENE-1908:
---
The last paragraph starts with:
bq. However the re
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754871#action_12754871
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1908:
-
{quote}
bq. However the resulted norm value is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1458?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754887#action_12754887
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1458:
bq. Maybe a directed acyclic word
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1781.patch
Patch that fixed prime meridian and antimeridian issues. Also pole flipp
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Bill Bell updated LUCENE-1781:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1781.patch)
> Large distances in Spatial go beyond Prime MEridian
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12754939#action_12754939
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1781:
Looks like great progress! I now
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755062#action_12755062
]
Marvin Humphrey commented on LUCENE-1908:
-
The rationale behind the coarseness of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler reopened LUCENE-1872:
---
Assignee: Uwe Schindler (was: Michael McCandless)
Some small updates after discussion on
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1872:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1872-cardinality.patch
Some notes about cardinality and precision step.
>
Sorry for all the confusion, indeed, the LuceneUtils class I was talking
about is not in the Lucene distro, so I'd like to appologize if I wasted
anyones time on this... *guilt*.
I'll second Yonik in thinking that maybe getField() is a bit broken
since it may lead to class cast exceptions, eve
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755076#action_12755076
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-1872:
Looks good Uwe!
> Improve javado
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755003#action_12755003
]
Jiri Kuhn commented on LUCENE-1908:
---
Yes, sounds great.
The consequence of encoding no
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1872:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-1872-cardinality.patch
> Improve javadocs for Numeric*
> --
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1872?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Uwe Schindler updated LUCENE-1872:
--
Attachment: (was: LUCENE-1872-cardinality.patch)
> Improve javadocs for Numeric*
> ---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Thomas D'Silva updated LUCENE-1910:
---
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Extension to MoreLikeThis to use tag information
> -
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755219#action_12755219
]
Doron Cohen commented on LUCENE-1908:
-
{quote}
The rationale behind the coarseness of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1908?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Doron Cohen updated LUCENE-1908:
Attachment: LUCENE-1908.patch
Updated patch according to comments for the norms section
To review
We could cut a *real* release candidate that we could VOTE on soon,
right? It's bee 3.5 weeks since the first release candidate.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mark Miller wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello Lucene users,
We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
more than a couple days being needed, and we have had one or two).
I'll go when you guys say go.
- Mark
Yonik Seeley wrote:
> We could cut a *real* releas
To be nit picky - I think its been 2.5 weeks.
I feel pretty good about 2.9 myself at this point though.
Mark Miller wrote:
> We certainly could - only thought I would have is that we do want RC4 to
> get a little exposure if possible (though at this point, I don't see
> more than a couple days be
+1 on calling a vote.
On Sep 14, 2009, at 7:45 PM, Yonik Seeley wrote:
We could cut a *real* release candidate that we could VOTE on soon,
right? It's bee 3.5 weeks since the first release candidate.
-Yonik
http://www.lucidimagination.com
On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 10:06 AM, Mark Miller
wro
hi guys,
Returning from a long freeze in the middle of releasing I feel rusty about
the process, so a quick question:
Will checking in documentation fixes anyhow interfere with this?
There are 3 such open issues marked for 2.9:
- LECENE-1908 (Similarity scoring jdocs) that is ready and I would lik
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1781?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12755344#action_12755344
]
Bill Bell commented on LUCENE-1781:
---
Probably, do we have someone else to tackle that on
23 matches
Mail list logo
