Can people-in-the-know comment and/or take action on LUCENE-1315?
If it is unpalateable, let me know the right way to do something along
these lines:
reader = IndexReader.open(directory);
searcher = new IndexSearcher(reader);
LocateRegistry.createRegistry(port);
Naming.rebind(nam
I am using the RMI RemoteSearchable. I don't use a central RMI
registry for the cluster (it's not particularly beneficial to do so),
so I have had none of the problems described above. It just works out
of the box.
Why not work towards RemoteSearchable instead of Searchable extending
java.rmi.Rem
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Grant Ingersoll <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26, 2008, at 8:19 PM, Anthony Urso wrote:
>
>> I am using the RMI RemoteSearchable. I don't use a central RMI
>> registry for the cluster (it's not particularly beneficial to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Urso updated LUCENE-1315:
-
Attachment: setIndexReader.diff
Patch attached.
> Add setIndexReader in IndexSearc
Versions: 2.3.2
Reporter: Anthony Urso
Priority: Trivial
Attachments: setIndexReader.diff
Adds a setter for the "private IndexReader reader" member in IndexSearcher.
Needed to in order to be able reload the reader underlying a remote searcher.
--
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Urso updated LUCENE-1315:
-
Attachment: (was: setIndexReader.diff)
> Add setIndexReader in IndexSearc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1315?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Anthony Urso updated LUCENE-1315:
-
Attachment: LUCENE-1315.patch
Renamed the patch file to standard name as per
http
Affects Versions: 2.4
Environment: Java 6. Directory.java and RAMDirectory.java are both at
revision 700591. The thread that threw this runs concurrently with others
searching and writing the same index.
Reporter: Anthony Urso
java.io.FileNotFoundException: segments_bu
