On Sun, 8 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jason or other Gump folks -
You realize that the mail has been auto-generated and Jason is only
the sender because he added the entry and we never bothered to change
it, don't you?
> We'd love to get Lucene's build working fine with G
On Mon, 9 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On May 9, 2005, at 3:57 AM, Stefan Bodewig wrote:
>> Feel free to add any "new" dependencies Gump is missing.
>
> What's the process for me to add new dependencies?
If the project you depend on is
On Tue, 10 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can (and probably will) change it such that is not run if
> JavaCC is not present and adjust it so that the check for JavaCC is
> only done on the targets that truly need it (but are not part of the
> main build path).
This may be
On Sun, 15 May 2005, Erik Hatcher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the issue with Lucene building with Gump?
No idea what has been the issue that caused your mail, since the
results had already been overwritten when I looked into it.
Until late last week Lucene didn't seem to cope with the v
