On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:12:20 Mark Miller wrote:
> On 03/16/2010 09:05 AM, Andrzej Bialecki wrote:
> >
> > You could have used git instead. There is a good integration
> > between git and svn, and it's much easier (a giant
> > understatement...) to handle branching and merging in git, both
> >
On Wednesday 04 February 2009 12:01:54 Michael McCandless wrote:
> Though: I thought JUnit invokes tests in the sequential order as they
> are defined in your class? (I'm not sure about this... it's just
> what seems to be the case).
Just looking at one of my unit tests: It reorders in some cas
Hello
The 'Document.getFieldables(String name)' is documented to return 'null'
in some cases (and really does, see the code below). However this makes
a penalty to the client, as code like this
Document doc = hits.doc(i);
for (Fieldable f: doc.getFieldables("somefield")) {
Syst
On Friday 14 March 2008 11:46:42 Michael McCandless wrote:
> I agree, this makes sense. I'll commit it. Thanks Stefan!
>
> Except, the last one you list (getBinaryValue) I think should still
> return null if no field by that name exists?
Yes, you are right. Looking at the array notion made me so
On Monday 17 March 2008 11:12:53 Michael McCandless wrote:
> The javadocs used to say "this method returns null when there are no
> matching fields". I removed that. Maybe I should add back in "this
> method returns an empty array when there are no matching fields"?
I generally prefer that the j
ith winstone? I use winstone currently for
servlet development and didn't encounter any problems. Quick start up
and low memory footprint.
http://winstone.sourceforge.net/
-r--r--r-- user group 327658 2008-04-10 11:28 winstone-0.9.10.jar
java -jar winstone-0.9.10.jar
On Friday 25 April 2008 15:36:40 mark harwood wrote:
>
> Stefan, the Winstone server appears to be LGPL not Apache which also
> adds some complexity.
Currently also CDDL. The author was not aware to cause some licence
problems by GPL and thereafter offered the CDDL (from a mailing list
discussio
