On Tue, 12 May 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Just in case anyone hasn't said it yet, add my name to the list of
> the eternally grateful for the glibc jdk, Chris,Steve, Karl et al.
>
I don't normally post "me too"s, but this is gonna be the exception to the
rule. Me Too.
I've final
Hello,
I've been trying to get jdb running under jdk1.1.5, with no luck. Has
anybody gotten this working? When I run jdb Layout, from the JDE/Debug
option, it says: "Initializing jdb..." and nothing more. Has anybody
gotten this to work?
Thanks,
Larry
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Christopher Seawood wrote:
[
[Actually, the glibc 2.0.7-7 of which I speak is an official update for RH
[5.0. It can be found in
[ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/redhat/redhat-5.0/updates/i386/ . Until RH gets
[ContribNet (http://developer.redhat.com/contribnet/) setup anything in
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Andy Stubbs wrote:
>
> OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch
> into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the
> redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6
> (this is the latest one I ca
> I was wondering if anyone out there is trying the same as I am and that
> is to set up the apache webserver for linux with the servlet module and
> development kit voor java servlets. I've been trying to do some things
> with the new jserv release of java and get it recompiled into a new make
>
Hi,
I was wondering if anyone out there is trying the same as I am and that
is to set up the apache webserver for linux with the servlet module and
development kit voor java servlets. I've been trying to do some things
with the new jserv release of java and get it recompiled into a new make
of ap
On Tue, 12 May 1998, Andy Stubbs wrote:
> As it happens, it isn't actually there; it's in the updates directory for
> RH 5.0. BUT... I can't work out why jdk1.1.5 is linked against a version
> of glibc2 which doesn't appear to exist in anything other than .rpm format
> and isn't even at the gnu f
On Tue, 12 May 1998, charles verge wrote:
> I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386
>
> I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up
> that I can no connect to some servers on the internet.
As it happens, it isn't actually
On Tue, 12 May 1998, charles verge wrote:
> I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the
> ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386
>
> I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up
> that I can no connect to some servers on the internet.
Actually, the glibc 2.0.7-7 of which
PLEASE DELETE THE INCOGNITO.NET
DOMAIN FROM THIS LIST.
PLEAE ADVISE HOW IT BECAME
LISTED.
-Original Message-From:
Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
12 May, 1998 6:12 PMS
PLEASE DELETE THE INCOGNITO.NET
DOMAIN FROM THIS LIST.
PLEAE ADVISE HOW IT BECAME
LISTED.
-Original Message-From:
charles verge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>To:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Date:
12 May, 1998 6:02 PMSubject: Re:
glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7I belive
On Tue, May 12, 1998 at 10:35:14AM -0700, Robert Coie wrote:
> Is it possible to specify a path for System.loadLibrary()? I have not
> been able to get LD_LIBRARY_PATH to have any effect. I hacked a
> version of java.lang.Runtime that dumps the result of the
> initializeLinkerInternal call to st
I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the
ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386
I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up
that I can no connect to some servers on the internet.
>
>OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch
>into full dia
First, apologies if these topics have been beaten to death. I have
had a hard time staying subscribed to this list as it seemed to bounce
around from server to server, and can't seem to find any recent
archives.
Is it possible to specify a path for System.loadLibrary()? I have not
been able to
Andy Stubbs wrote:
>
> OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch
> into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the
> redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6
> (this is the latest one I can *find*) which I comp
OK... obviously I've not got them working together, so before I launch
into full diagnostics: I notice on the website that glibc-2.0.7-7 is the
redhat package recommended. Now, not being an rpm type, I only have 2.0.6
(this is the latest one I can *find*) which I compiled myself... So my
question
Once upon a time, James Cribb wrote
> Chris Adams wrote:
> > The biggest problem is that I can't run anything that uses the
> > InstallShield Java Edition.
>
> After I installed the Intel Linux JDK 1.1.5 (v7), the Install Shield stuff in
> Together/J (http://www.oi.com) seemed to activate a bug t
17 matches
Mail list logo
