YOUR HOME TOWN
WILL DO 100% OF THE WORK FOR YOU
WE OFFER:
You the chance to own your own Home Based Business.
WE OFFER:
To build your Home Based Business for you.
WE OFFER
You financial independence.
WE OFFER:
You life saving and life changing products.
WE OFFER:
You the easiest way w
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote:
> > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with
> > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself.
>
> Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the
> jdk? I for one would be in
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Gernot Koller wrote:
> Quoting Peter Ziobrzynski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> >
> > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with
> > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself.
> > I have good results after rebuilding. Here is my she
GET THE MONEY YOU NEED RIGHT NOW!
Here's your chance to...
> Eliminate Credit Card Debt!
> Take advantage of LOW INTEREST RATES!
> Escape from High Monthly Payments!
> Get Relief and Have the Money You Need!
> Cash in Your Pocket Usually
On 10 Jul 1998, Albert Lai wrote:
> Zhichao Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac,
> > it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk,
> > instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf -
> > Is this a probl
... are not the same thing!
There is TurboJ, which appears to be a Java -> Native ahead of
time compiler.
There is also OSF's JDK, which is a 1.1.6 JDK with linuxthreads
support.
These are not the same! The JDK appears that it will be free for
non-commericial us
> and JIT apparently
(I'm assuming you're refering to TurboJ)
I don't think so. I got the impression it compiles pretty much the entire code,
with optimizations and such. So it's not a JIT, but more of a SCTISINLR - Slow
Compiler That Increases Speed In The Long Run :)
And also, it doesn't seem
[TurboJ price]
> US$2000
For that kind of money I can just by myself a faster computer instead :)
/ Peter Schuller
> 40% of how much memory?
40% CPU. Not RAM. That's according to the normal kernel calculated system load
values. And, as I said, that's on a P133 with no other major CPU hog running.
As for RAM it's not that bad. It's currently up to 24 megs, but that's from
editing code. I imagine that if I do
On Fri, Jul 10, 1998 at 01:38:30PM -0400, Charles Forsythe wrote:
> > I also could not find any pricing information about turboj...
>
> US$2000
>
> (for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux)
I actually inquired about this, and this is the response I got :
-- cut --
>From [EMAIL
Zhichao Hong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac,
> it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk,
> instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf -
> Is this a problem?
The way you unpacked the package is not a
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Charles Forsythe wrote:
> > I also could not find any pricing information about turboj...
>
> US$2000
>
> (for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux)
>
>
Apparantly you get the sales prices by asking at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED], but anyway,
the Linux
I Never Thought I'd Be the One Telling You This:
I Actually Read a Piece of E-Mail & I'm Going to Europe on the Proceeds!
Hello!
My name is Karen. I'm a 35-year-old mom, wife, and part-time accountant. As a rule, I delete all unsolicited "junk" e-mail and use my account primarily for business.
> I also could not find any pricing information about turboj...
US$2000
(for HP-UX -- I assume it's the same for Linux)
>Interesting. Do you remember which version of lesstif-current you used? My
>tests
>are based on 1.18 with last change in ChanageLog done on 1998/03/24 23:00:45.
Since mozilla released on April 1, there were lots and lots of improvement
on lesstif. You need something more up to date.
Just get th
Tom Sedge writes:
> I don't think they are ready with their JDK yet - couldn't find that on
> the site.
I also could not find any pricing information about turboj...
--
A diplomat is man who always remembers a woman's birthday but never her age.
-- Robert Frost
Has somebody done some working on that?
--
Time sharing: The use of many people by the computer.
Roland Parviainen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote:
>
> > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with
> > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself.
> >
> > Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif versio
For everyone using libdl.so.1.9.9 and JDK 1.1.6v2.
Try remove the libdl.so.1 and libc.so.5 from your
$JAVA_HOME/lib/i686/green_threads/
Assuming you are using a newer libc5 like libc.so.5.4.44 of course.
In any case, read the README.linux file.
Cheers,
Paul
Hi,
Please help a new beginner,
I download jdk1.1.6 and installed on redhat linux 5.0. When I type javac,
it just coredumps. I didn't use tar zxvf file.gz to untar the jdk,
instead I use gunzip < file.gz| tar -xvf -
Is this a problem?
My computer is Intel motherboard and Pentium 233 MHZ.
Pl
On Fri, 10 Jul 1998, Stefan Magdalinski wrote:
> and JIT apparently
>
> http://www.gr.opengroup.org/java/jdk/linux/
Actually, it's a bit more than a JIT:
'Turbo is a Java (TM) byte code to native code compiler. Like a JIT
compiler (and unlike traditional compilers) it does not require the
appl
We are using libc5. I tried Pauls advice of removing the two files libc.so.5
and libdl.so.1 from ~JAVAHOME/lib/i686/green_threads/ This seemed to fix the
problem keeping the 1.9.9 version of the system ld.so library.
-John
Casiraghi Luigi wrote:
> In data 06.58 09/07/98 -0700, John Vliet ha sc
In data 06.58 09/07/98 -0700, John Vliet ha scritto:
>In my description of the problem I mentioned that you can replace the
>ld-linux.so library with an older version (1.9.5 as opposed to 1.9.9)
>and the Java stuff seems to work fine. Unfortunately this causes our
>dhtml server and it's database t
In data 05.08 10/07/98 -0700, peter johnson ha scritto:
>
>
>Casiraghi Luigi wrote:
>
>> I received a SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation.
>>
>> Here is my configuration:
>>
>> Linux Slackware 3.0 (kernel 2.0.0)
>> jdk1.1.6v2
>> libc5 (I upgraded to libc to libc5.4.44 and also ld as recommende
and JIT apparently
http://www.gr.opengroup.org/java/jdk/linux/
--
/**
Stefan Magdalinski m 0370 67 70 58
[EMAIL PROTECTED] h 0171 580 0831
it's isness as usual...**/
--
| From: peter.schuller / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: java-linux / mime, , , [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subject: RE: NetBeans
| Date: Friday, July 10, 1998 2:11PM
|
| > I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
| > run it I got only very nice welcome screen
I've downloaded the JDK1.1.6-v2 on my Debian 2.0 and
can't get a simple applet running:
import java.applet.*;
import java.awt.*;
public class AppletTest extends Applet {
public void paint(Graphics g) {;}
}
Works fine with JDK1.1.5 (I've to resize the window to see anything,
but this bug shou
> I wonder, did anyone try to run NetBeans on Linux? When I tried to
> run it I got only very nice welcome screen and after this nothing
> happened.
If you're on 1.1.5v7 that happens almost all the time. In 1.1.6v2 it happens
sometimes, but just try again and it should work. That's my experie
Casiraghi Luigi wrote:
> I received a SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation.
>
> Here is my configuration:
>
> Linux Slackware 3.0 (kernel 2.0.0)
> jdk1.1.6v2
> libc5 (I upgraded to libc to libc5.4.44 and also ld as recommended)
>
> ldconfig -D output
>
> ldconfig: version 1.9.9
> libdl
Greetings,
I have JDK1.1.6v2 (glibc) from Blackdown on a Linux (RedHat5.1) x86 computer.
When doing the Together/J 2.0 (Whiteboard Edition, see http://www.oi.com) tutorial I
find
that it is impossible to enter caps (LIKE THIS) in the source editor (Text pane).
This inability includes all shifte
Maybe you could check out a library called Carnac from INT
http://www.int.com
I don't know how far the mapping stiff goes, but I briefly saw some
demos of this toolkit and one of them, displayed some maps.
Cheers,
Addy.
|
| I'm also searching for some Java based GIS tools.
|
| You can look a
On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote:
> > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with
> > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself.
>
> Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the
> jdk? I for one would be i
32 matches
Mail list logo
