[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I've tested this small application (jdk116-v2 with a RH 5.1) and
> I've discovered a memory corruption:
> when the focus is lost from the TextField I assign 0 to the local
> variable var1, if the parseInt throws an exception (i.e. I don't
> write ant value in TF
simply give the appletviewer the complete url pointing to your html page.
it will scan it for applet tags and depending on the version, will run all
applets in the html page.
one liitation i have found is that the appletviewer from sun will only
recognize a single jar file in an 'archive' tag.
It may be a dumb question, but...
I have compiled and build an applet under JDK1.1.6 (Blackdown version)
under RedHat Linux 5.0. The compiler gives no errors. With the current
directory being the directory where the file XYZApplet.class is and an
HTML file with the name XYZ.html in the same dire
Hi,
I've tested this small application (jdk116-v2 with a RH 5.1) and
I've discovered a memory corruption:
when the focus is lost from the TextField I assign 0 to the local
variable var1, if the parseInt throws an exception (i.e. I don't
write ant value in TF) the content of var1 is corrupted: it a
On Sun, 23 Aug 1998 12:14:38 -0700, ernie wright wrote:
>i am new to this thread. can someone quickly bring me up to date about my
>otions for running java on redhat 5.1?
>
>Blackdown and Open Group sound familiar but which can i use and how far
>behind Sun's jdk are they?
My company has be ver
i am new to this thread. can someone quickly bring me up to date about my
otions for running java on redhat 5.1?
Blackdown and Open Group sound familiar but which can i use and how far
behind Sun's jdk are they?
-Original Message-
From: Bernd Kreimeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PR
Ignore if you couldn't care less about "To Diff Or Not..".
--
> The Open Group has its own business realities to deal with.
> Your demand -- that they adopt your favorite business model
> for sharing source -- seems an awfully harsh one
I've been reading the list for a bit and I have a quick question. Is the
Black Down porting effort primarily focussed on porting the JDK or does
it also include porting some of the extensions (javax) APIs defined by
JavaSoft, such as the Communications API? I assume this is a dumb
question, but I
