Just a note in case no one has told you for a while--the work you do is great.
-- Richard
On Fri, 11 Sep 1998, Syed Mubin wrote:
>
> Hi Everybody there,
>
>
> At present iam running JDK 1.1.5 on Red hat Linux 5.1 which works
> fine ,recently i downloaded Swing but iam unable to install its giving
>
> when i tried to run such a simple program given below
>
Where can I obtain a copy of the ported JRE or instructions on how to
convert the ported JDK down to JRE?
-Jeremy
Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Ed Huott writes:
> > The license states that binaries derived from the licensed (Sun's)
> > source code cannot be distributed for a fee or with any product
__
Syed Mubeen National Centre For Biological Sciences,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]TIFR Centre, P.B #1234,
80-334-5615 or 4062 or 3035 IISc Campus,
Banga
> I looked in the Jdk home directory and there was a file
> "java",but it is not executable!? The only files there that are
> executable are *java-wrapper,*java-rmi.cgi,and *jre.
Have you tried this:
su root
chmod +x java
??
But you wrote that you have a RedHat. In this case mos
I must to interface a Unix script with java application.
I try with
import java.io.*;
...
try{
String[] com_ps=
{"/bin/sh", "-c", "/bin/chmod 755 esegue", "./esegue"};
Process p = Runtime.getRuntime().exec(com_ps);
}catch (IOException e0){
System.err.println(e0);
System.exit(0);
}
}
}
My scrip
I seem to have forgotten the incantation to get the VM to print a
"full thread dump" on demand - I had thought it was C-\, but it just
core dumps.
I'm currently using the glibc 116v3a.
Thanks,
-mik
--
Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi,
I'm a Linux newbie with a Redhat 5.1 who would really need some help.I
downloaded the day before all the JDK 1.1.6 -v2 for glibc Linux
directory from a mirror,together with a file jdk1_1_6-v2diffs.gz for
glibc (from the "common" directory)I unziped & untarred the files
without problems,result
Ed Huott writes:
> The license states that binaries derived from the licensed (Sun's)
> source code cannot be distributed for a fee or with any product for
> which a fee is charged. It also states that the Licensed Software cannot
> be used "for commercial or productive" use without getting a
