Terry Harding wrote:
>
> > I downloaded and installed the JDK1.1.6 v2 for Intel( glibc ). The
> >
> > I am running as root on the latest version of SlackWar
> >
Terry,
you will probbaly need the libc5 version of JDK if you have slackware
linux,
see the README.linux file in the distribution you
Can anyone gives me any hints or clues why i might be getting the
error message described below.
I would like to use the JDK tonight.
Thanks in advance...
Terry Harding wrote:
>
> All,
>
> I downloaded and installed the JDK1.1.6 v2 for Intel( glibc ). The
> installation appeared
> to go wit
Saje original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: miércoles 7 de octubre de 1998 11:05
Asunto: Example of CardLayout.
>Please, send a example of CardLayout using model event of JDK 1.1
>Sorry, for my english..
>Thank you.
>
-Mensaje original-
De: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: miércoles 7 de octubre de 1998 14:11
Asunto: JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?
>Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
>yet? Sun keeps pointing me at f
-Mensaje original-
De: Mehrdad Jahansoozi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: miércoles 7 de octubre de 1998 0:03
Asunto: JIT
>Greetings,
>
>Apparently, There is a confusion between JIT compiler, and JIT virtual
>machine( VM ).
>I was looking fo
Michael Thome wrote:
>
> Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
> yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their server that don't exist.
I downloaded mine this morning.
Salud y naturaleza: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.pelayo-j.com [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ftp://ftp.pelayo-j.com
-Mensaje original-
De: Wim Ceulemans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Fecha: martes 6 de octubre de 1998 19:15
Asu
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> > John Summerfield writes:
> > > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > >
> > > Well I for
[On behalf of those who couldn't find their ass with both hands and
a hounddog, I'm going to apolgize _for_ them:]
"Dear JDK Porting Team and Documentation Authors,
We apologize for copping an attitude, and _will never do it again_
for fear that WE would have to spend our precious time listenin
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
I know this is not exactly where i should post this question , but it seems
like this is where I learned a lot of things concerning Java topics
(although I haven't use my Linux box for a while), I hope you-experienced
java programmers- might help me out with this.
I'm trying to implement a Help S
can't we all just get along
-rob
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Dug Birdzell wrote:
> all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
>
> recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
> feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point
At 01:14 PM 10/7/98 -0400, you wrote:
>Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the
>a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the
>thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as
>someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I ha
all right, poor choice of words.., and really besides the point anyway.
recent post said it best: "no attitude necessary". if you don't
feel like answering a question, then don't answer it. what's the point of
getting down on other programmers for asking a question?
Yours,
Dug Birdzell
If you would take the time to observe this list for a while then you would realize
that just about every question is answered almost immediately. I know I asked a
lot of redundant and simple questions and always got an answer. Please, wait for
more than one email as your reference before attacki
Let me just put in my two cents as another newbie. It's a pain in the
a** to have to RTFM all the time. Has anyone counted up all the
thousands of pages of documents there are out there? Speaking as
someone who has been R'ing TFM instead of asking, I have to say that
while it gives me a great d
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> >
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>
>
Robert,
I'm not trying to screw things up for anyone, and I am as appreciative
of their efforts as anyone. I too have gotten a great deal of useful
information from reading this list. I was simply trying to make the
point that there are a lot of reasons why someone posts a question to
the grou
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998, Robert Ritchy wrote:
> Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
> has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
> reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
> give us a quality
Bear in mind that privatization of knowledge of technologies which compete
with the Dark Side only serve to empower it.
Yours,
Dug Birdzell Software Engineer HuskyLabs
[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.butterfly.net/~dug www.lab.com
> "Kevin" == Kevin Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Kevin> With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for
Kevin> Microsoft.
Back off! Without his work you'd be using Microsoft!
--
Stephen
---
Perl is really designed more for the guys that will hack Perl at least
20 minut
Listen - as yet another newbie - don't screw things up for me. This list
has been EXTREMELY helpful to me and my work. The promptness and quality of
reponse from this list is unmatched. These "gurus" have taken a lot time to
give us a quality product and support for FREE! They are certainl
With that kind of attitude...heck...you could work for Microsoft.
> > Exercise patience and courtesy in your replies. You too were a beginner
> > once.
>
> Yes. And I didn't ask for help before exhausting the other options, if I asked
> for help at all.
>
I managed it
--
> Da: Michael Thome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> A: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Oggetto: JDK 1.1.7 source released yet?
> Data: Wednesday, October 07, 1998 1:01 PM
>
> Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
> yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their serv
Steve Byrne wrote:
> John Summerfield writes:
> > > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
> > Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
> I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
>...
> > I can see no mention
John Summerfield writes:
> On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> >
> > Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
> Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I guess README.linux *could* be named more obviously :-)
Hi
Anyone picked up on mp3 players for java ?
Jerry
Yes I had audio clips in application being garbled and looping at
arbitary points for odd reasons (bad for java games).
I thought it was because the data was never being completely loaded.
Ah, maybe I should look `MediaTracker'. Implement Audio version of
Swing/JFC ImageI
All,
I downloaded and installed the JDK1.1.6 v2 for Intel( glibc ). The
installation appeared
to go with no hitches. The jdk was installed into /usr/local/jdk1.1.6.
When i type javac *.java from the jdk1.1.6 main directory i receive
/usr/local/jdk1.1.6/bin/../bin/i586/green_threads/javac:
/usr/
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 21:05:39 +0800 (WST), John Summerfield wrote:
>On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
>>
>> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
>
>Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
>I've just installed the jre o
Your code looks ok to me, however it appears as though the JVM has
a problem with the array of type string ( I assume "args[]" is a array of
strings).
Try using an explicit cast of the array element to a string before the
"equals(x)" call
like this " ((String)args[4]).equals( "yes" ) .
Good lu
On Tue, 6 Oct 1998, Steve Byrne wrote:
>
> Aw, come on, man! RTFM! I covered this in great detail; you should take the
Well I for one don't know which frigging document you're talking about.
I've just installed the jre on a system without X. To make the jre even run
I found it necessary to in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Please, send a example of CardLayout using model event of JDK 1.1
> Sorry, for my english..
> Thank you.
Hi,
try out the java-tutorial available at the java homepage
http://java.sun.com
It covers almost everything one can do with Java
enjoy
Mark
--
M a r
On Wed, 7 Oct 1998 02:26:37 -0400 (EDT), Gwobaw A. Wu wrote:
>Hi,
>I thought this problem is fixed in jdk1.1.6v4, but I still have it:
>java.net.SocketException: invalid DatagramSocket option
>at
>java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.setOption(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:155)
>at ja
Any of you noncom licensees been able to get their 117 distribution
yet? Sun keeps pointing me at files on their server that don't exist.
thanks,
-mik
--
Michael Thome ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
Hi.
I am trying to test two strings for equality, but the virtual machine
throws me an unexpected exception.
The equality test is simply
if ( args[4].equals( "yes" ) )
System.out.println( pyr.toString() );
The result is
Stack Trace : java.lang.NumberFormatException: yes
at java.lan
Please, send a example of CardLayout using model event of JDK 1.1
Sorry, for my english..
Thank you.
Hi folks.
When I try execute java, javac, jar ... I receive follow error message:
Can't load library 'libjava.so'. My OS is linux RedHat 5.0 and I use
JDK1.1.1.
Thanks in advance.
Ioan Salau
from Sibiu, Romania
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I thought this problem is fixed in jdk1.1.6v4, but I still have it:
java.net.SocketException: invalid DatagramSocket option
at
java.net.PlainDatagramSocketImpl.setOption(PlainDatagramSocketImpl.java:155)
at java.net.MulticastSocket.create(MulticastSocket.java:111)
at j
Thanks for your help.
I guess this is first time I run javah with a package.
--- Gwobaw ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
3115 EECS, (313) 647-3780
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Hello,
>
> I installed the latest jdk. With this jdk I get a thread dump (see below) using
> the following native code (just parsing a string). With jdk1.1.6-v2 it worked
> just fine. Can somebody give the code a try? I am very curious if it works on
> another se
Wim Ceulemans writes:
> Hi
>
> I'm testing a little application that has to run on a linux server without X
> installed. When I run it on my linux box without X running, it runs fine.
> But when I run in on a linux box without X installed I get the following:
>
> /usr/local/jdk1.1.6v4a/bi
42 matches
Mail list logo
