I installed the Java Plugin (activator-linux-glibc) on Linux 2.0.34
with Netscape 4.06. At the end of installation I'm told:
Java(TM) Plug-in installation done.
but in the Netscape window it says:
You do not have the Java(TM) Plug-in installed.
I tried this several times. The first time ro
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998, Jim Burmeister wrote:
> Swing button mnemonics work just fine for me, both in standalone buttons
> and menus. I've used them in my own code, and I also just checked the
> SwingSet demo and it works OK too. I did nothing special to set them up;
> pressing Alt+key has always
this one I have experienced it.
You got a memory problem there.
> But when I try something like:
> $java Hello
> I get:
>
> SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
>
> Full thread dump:
> Monitor Cache Dump:
> Registered Monitor Dump:
> Monitor IO lock:
> Child death monitor:
> E
Well. I'm not sure why so many people having problem
with their JDK. I myself has installed two different
version of glibc-jdk into a few fresh Redhat Linux.
Both 5.0 and 5.1 and never have a single bit of
problems.
Sze Wong
---Jim Burmeister <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Jason Chambers wro
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 17:15:47 -0400 (EDT), Jim Burmeister wrote:
>Jason Chambers wrote (well, quoted):
>
>> If I create a test.java file and then invoke "javac test.java", nothing
>> happens. I just get a command prompt back. No test.class file is
>> created, no errors, no messages, nothing.
>
>
On 14-Oct-98 Joe Carter wrote:
>My linux box has the same java facilities as the solaris box.
>I'm fairly certain you can talk either way.
>
>There's no "rmid" in the solaris 1.1.6.
>My solaris stuff only uses rmiregistry...
I have to use solaris because there is the JDK1.2. I thought that RMI
w
> I am trying to compile the attached program in javac. I've tested it
> under Sun's JDK 1.1.5 on Solaris, Symantec's Visual Cafe (forgot which
> version, but it's based on JDK 1.1.3) on Windows NT, and Blackdown's JDK
> 1.1.6v5 on Linux. All of them give the exact same result:
>
> java.lang.Nul
Jason Chambers wrote (well, quoted):
> If I create a test.java file and then invoke "javac test.java", nothing
> happens. I just get a command prompt back. No test.class file is
> created, no errors, no messages, nothing.
A few weeks ago, when I decided to start using Java, I downloaded the JD
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 14:51:46 +0200 (MET DST), Kontorotsui wrote:
>
>On 14-Oct-98 Joe Carter wrote:
>>My linux box has the same java facilities as the solaris box.
>>I'm fairly certain you can talk either way.
>>
>>There's no "rmid" in the solaris 1.1.6.
>>My solaris stuff only uses rmiregistry...
Hi,
as I've written ASAP here's the promised patch!
Please consider: this is a quite _fresh_ piece of
software, perhaps not enough tested.
I am very _interested_ in your _feedback_.
Any kind of success story is very appreciated ;)
I want to say THANK YOU to all users who have informed me
abou
Jason,
Your path may still be the problem. Un*x doesn't search the current
directory unless the path contains a "." and, if the path does contain a
".", the current directory will be searched after any directories that
precede that "." in the path.
It sounds like you may be executing a differen
Cynthia Jeness wrote:
>
> Tram,
>
> I see similar results and believe that this was a "bug?" introduced in the
> second early access release. In order to work around it, I put all of my help
> initilialization in the "run" method of its own class. Then I use
> "SwingUtilities.invokeLater()" on
Andrew,
I'd like to say, in the nicest way possible, your java installation isn't
using the correct libraries. Either you have a mixed set of libraries or
some mixed java code. I would suggest removing previous versions of java
that may use the old libc5 libraries, making sure you have a clean
I picked up the following message from the mailing list:
>2. Having uncompressed JDK116v5 (the one without the "b" at the end) it
>creates all the directories to hold the jdk. If I go into
/jdk116v5/bin
>and create a test.java file and then invoke "javac test.java", nothing
>happens. I just ge
Hello All.
Some time ago on my linux box JDK-1.1.3 + libc5
was working fine.
Then I have decided to update my linux to glibc2.
So, I downloaded and installed glibc2 (2.0.95). Then
I downloaded and installed jdk1.1.6v2-i386-glibc.tar.gz
to /usr/local/opt/JDK. (files libc.so and libdl.so w
On Wed, 14 Oct 1998 17:51:51 +0100, Arif H Saleem wrote:
>hi!
>
>We have used the jdk 1.1.6v5 tar.gz to build an rpm on an i386 RedHat 5.1
>system. We have glibc 2.0.7-19 installed (also glibc-devel) and lesstif 0.86.5.
>We had no problem building the rpm but on installation we get a failed
>de
Hi,
What I do to activate business objects is create a "Broker" object that is
started by hand, this object is responsible for activating other business
objects through a Factory pattern:
Broker broker = Naming.lookup ( blah blah blah );
myObject = (MyInterface)broker.createObject ("COM.mydomain
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 12:29:30 -0400 (EDT), Jim Burmeister wrote:
>Eu Hin Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Has anyone ever managed to get keyboard mnemonics working for JButtons
>> using Swing?
>>
>> e.g.
>>
>> OKButton.setMnemonic('o');
>>
>> Under windows 95/8/NT, all of my code (including
Eu Hin Chua <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Has anyone ever managed to get keyboard mnemonics working for JButtons
> using Swing?
>
> e.g.
>
> OKButton.setMnemonic('o');
>
> Under windows 95/8/NT, all of my code (including the SwingSet demo)
> performs as expected, with the ALT key being used to
Sounds like you have a classpath problem which is common error
with newbies. The problem is that invocation of the java interpreter with
the classpath set to ".:~/:..." will use the current directory as the base
for
the search therefore the JVM will be looking for the class in the directory
/packa
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 07:44:31 -0400, Jim Ridenour wrote:
> First let me say I'm new to Linux, but I do run other programs on it
>successfully.
>I have two questions:
>
>1. On Blackdown's mirror sites for JDK116_v5 they have two files beginning
>with jdk... and differing only by the letter "b" to
At 03:08 PM 10/15/98 +0200, Willi Richert wrote:
>In my opinion you are right. Finally someone who believes in Linux as
>the most powerful platform for developing and executin Java apps!
>However, in my opinion Linux lacks of a real *good* IDE (such as
>JBuilder from Inprise). The KDE-mailing list
> This bring up a basic problem with Linux. It's intel centric. Although
> linux runs on a multitude of CPU's it is still centered around
> the intel cpu. It's offered e quit a bit of freedom in choosing a free
> OS. but try finding binaries for the alternative platforms.
> The percentages of Li
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 10:15:03 +0100, Michael Kranz wrote:
>Hi,
>
>believe it or not: I really mean rmid; look at
>
>http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/tooldocs/solaris/rmid.html
>
>The same is true with Windows. So my question was, is there rmid in
>JDK1.1.6, especially under Linux? What I
Michael Kranz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> believe it or not: I really mean rmid; look at
> http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/tooldocs/solaris/rmid.html
>
OK I've looked into this, and now understand.
rmid is a 1.2 enhancement. It is not in _any_ version of 1.1.x
On 1.1 RMI systems the remote ob
First let me say I'm new to Linux, but I do run other programs on it
successfully.
I have two questions:
1. On Blackdown's mirror sites for JDK116_v5 they have two files beginning
with jdk... and differing only by the letter "b" toward the end. The one
without the "b" appears to be the one I
... stuff removed...
>BTW, Date.java does have a constructor and an accessor function. I
>compile Testdate.java using:
>javac -classpath .:~/:/opt/jdk1.1.6v4a/lib/classes.zip Testdate.java
>
>The compile executes without warnings or errors. But when I attempt to
>run the app using:
>java -class
Hi,
believe it or not: I really mean rmid; look at
http://java.sun.com/products/jdk/1.2/docs/tooldocs/solaris/rmid.html
The same is true with Windows. So my question was, is there rmid in
JDK1.1.6, especially under Linux? What I learned from you, folks: Apparently
not. But read ahead...
Is the
On Thu, 15 Oct 1998 00:23:45 -0500, Trevor Harmon wrote:
>I am trying to compile the attached program in javac. I've tested it
>under Sun's JDK 1.1.5 on Solaris, Symantec's Visual Cafe (forgot which
>version, but it's based on JDK 1.1.3) on Windows NT, and Blackdown's JDK
>1.1.6v5 on Linux. All o
I am trying to compile the attached program in javac. I've tested it
under Sun's JDK 1.1.5 on Solaris, Symantec's Visual Cafe (forgot which
version, but it's based on JDK 1.1.3) on Windows NT, and Blackdown's JDK
1.1.6v5 on Linux. All of them give the exact same result:
java.lang.NullPointerExcep
30 matches
Mail list logo
