Re: Interest in a JIT on Linux

1998-11-02 Thread Java News Collector
At 03:40 PM 11/2/98 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> user who happens to work for IBM in the Research division, I've been wondering >> if some of the technology we have here could be useful to the Java on Linux >> effort. More specifically, I was thinking that I might be able to get a >> "resea

Re: Interest in a JIT on Linux

1998-11-02 Thread mlorton
> user who happens to work for IBM in the Research division, I've been wondering > if some of the technology we have here could be useful to the Java on Linux > effort. More specifically, I was thinking that I might be able to get a > "research" effort going to port IBM's Intel JVM with its JIT (

Interest in a JIT on Linux

1998-11-02 Thread James R Russell
Hi, I've been seeing a lot of articles like the following recently, and as a Linux user who happens to work for IBM in the Research division, I've been wondering if some of the technology we have here could be useful to the Java on Linux effort. More specifically, I was thinking that I might be

Re: RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread dan
I concur, in general, about the cryptic errors that occur with JNI coding. I tend not to put everything within a single function call, but I do follow the KISS principle (Keep It Simple, Stupid). May I also suggest the book, "essential JNI: Java Native Interface" (sic on capitalization), by

Re: RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread Diego Pons
Andrew McLaughlin wrote: > > Hi Diego, > > I'm a little dense in this area, can you break down the components? I'm thinking >that I'll > have to write my own software on the server side to be able to select data as well >as do > the normal I/O. While UniData does have a C adapter so that I can

Re: Problems on Sparc; redhat 5.1

1998-11-02 Thread Johan Vos
Red Hat 5.1 on Sparc uses glibc, while the JDK-port for sparclinux is built using libc-5 (which was distributed with Red Hat 4.x). I was working on a glibc-port (http://www.sesuadra.org/~jdk), but since JDK 1.2 is due to be out soon, I think it is better to work on a JDK 1.2 port for sparclinux gl

Re: RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread dan
JNI stands for Java Native Interface. It allows a Java program to access C & C++ methods. By using established C-to-Fortran bindings, you can also interface Java to Fortran using JNI. JNI will work for your purposes. Basically, you declare all of the C functions that you want to call as 'na

Re: RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread Andrew McLaughlin
Hi Diego, I'm a little dense in this area, can you break down the components? I'm thinking that I'll have to write my own software on the server side to be able to select data as well as do the normal I/O. While UniData does have a C adapter so that I can access the data files from Unix I'm not

[Fwd: Final Release of NetBeans Developer 2.0 available now]

1998-11-02 Thread Andrew V. Shuvalov
Download is damn slow. Andrew Original Message Subject: Final Release of NetBeans Developer 2.0 available now Date: Mon, 2 Nov 1998 14:30:48 -0600 From: NetBeans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dear NetBeans user, It's available ! The much anticipated final release

Re: Java crypt

1998-11-02 Thread Kenny Freeman
Do a search for cryptix java. It is an encryption library written entirely in java (native methods for windows and a few others). As far as I know it can be downloaded from sites in the UK. It includes blowfish, des, des3, idea and morecan't remember their main url though - I think development

Java crypt

1998-11-02 Thread phongsri
Hi, what is the situation of cryptography apis for java for european reseident? At java.sun.com is forbidden the download for non-US resident and I didn't see any class for java in the usual european sites for cryptography. Thanks Fulco Muriglio

Alpha port?

1998-11-02 Thread John Goerzen
[ Please CC me your reply! ] Hello, I just got a DEC Alpha 21164 box. I'm running Debian on it. I went to the ports page but the port from "Uncle George" is not accessible (permission denied error). Can anybody point me to where I might find the Alpha version, appropriate diffs to compile i

Re: JFC Compiling problems?

1998-11-02 Thread Andrew McLaughlin
Did you try: java SwingSet Worked for me... Andrew [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > What is the compilation error ? > > __ Reply Separator _ > Subject: JFC Compiling problems? > Author: sgee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at lon-mime > Date:

Re: RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread Diego Pons
Andrew McLaughlin wrote: > > Is anyone working with RMI so far? I'm launching into a project where I'll try to > connect Sanfrancisco to a legacy database (UniData). While UniData does provide ODBC > it's too slow and, gulp, read-only. > > I welcome any and all commentary with open arms and squi

Syntax error in checkVersions script

1998-11-02 Thread Sean Starkey
I found a small syntax error in the checkVersions script that is distributed with jdk 1.1.6.v5 (i386-libc). Below is a diff of the small change I made to fix the problem: bash# diff -c checkVersions.orig checkVersions *** checkVersions.orig Mon Nov 2 11:18:24 1998 --- checkVersions Mon

RMI anyone?!

1998-11-02 Thread Andrew McLaughlin
Is anyone working with RMI so far? I'm launching into a project where I'll try to connect Sanfrancisco to a legacy database (UniData). While UniData does provide ODBC it's too slow and, gulp, read-only. I welcome any and all commentary with open arms and squinted eyes!! Andrew -- Andrew McLaugh

Re: Sun to deliver JDK 1.2 for Linux

1998-11-02 Thread Andrew V. Shuvalov
The similar, but not the same article at: http://www.infoworld.com/cgi-bin/displayStory.pl?98112.ecsunjava2.htm Comments, please? > Hi everyone, > > I just read the following news about Sun's plans about Java for Linux: > http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/981102/sun_micros_3.html > I guess you would be in

Sun to deliver JDK 1.2 for Linux

1998-11-02 Thread Jauvane Cavalcante de Oliveira
Hi everyone, I just read the following news about Sun's plans about Java for Linux: http://biz.yahoo.com/bw/981102/sun_micros_3.html I guess you would be interested as well. Bye now, - _/ _/_/ Jauvane Cavalcant

Re: JFC Compilation still bothersome

1998-11-02 Thread peter . pilgrim
No. Swing 1.0.3 should have the older com.sun.java.swing which is correct. I dont think the order of the swing and JDK jar file in the CLASSPATH will make any difference, but perhaps you should put the `period' `dot' at the front of your CLASSPATH . Do

Re: JFC Compiling problems?

1998-11-02 Thread peter . pilgrim
What is the compilation error ? __ Reply Separator _ Subject: JFC Compiling problems? Author: sgee ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) at lon-mime Date:30/10/98 19:35 Any reason why I can run ". runnit" from the SwingSet directory, but can'

JFC Compilation still bothersome

1998-11-02 Thread sgee
Still having problems compiling import com.sun.java.swing.*; public class test extends JFrame{ public test(){ this.setSize(300,300); this.setVisible(true); }//end constructor public static void main(String args[]){ new test(); }//end main }//e

Re: Announcing JDK 1.1.7_v1a with Native Threads!

1998-11-02 Thread Nelson Minar
cool! Good work!

Announcing JDK 1.1.7_v1a with Native Threads!

1998-11-02 Thread Kevin B. Hendricks
Hi, Here is our final port of JDK 1.1.7 with Native Threads! Both Scott and I have signed Steve Byrne's License to get 1.2 sources and will start its port soon. Here are the key parts of the release note (sorry for the length). Thanks, Your Blackdown JDK PPC Porters: Scott Hutinger and Kevin

Re: Newbie mySQL MkLinux and JDBC

1998-11-02 Thread peter . pilgrim
What is your problem ? Compiling MySQL out of the box or Compiling a JDBC driver ? Why are trying to compile the JDBC driver? You should not need to compile it. The JDBC driver that I have come across have been precompiled. Therefore you should just install it on your system

Re:

1998-11-02 Thread Ravindran Nagarajah
Yes, I have problems getting unsubscribed myself. Please remove me from mailinglist. my add. [EMAIL PROTECTED] or [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thanks. On Mon, 02 Nov 1998, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >You have not been removed, I couldn't find your name on the list. > >If this wasn't your intention or