1 CTA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I compile my code the JDK says the java.lang.Object is not found. What
> is the reason for this problem?
This means that the compiler can't find the Sun classes.zip file. You
didn't specify the JDK version so I can't help you nail it down that
way. Commonly is me
I had the same problem until I installed the rt package and included
the rt.jar file in my CLASSPATH.
david
http://www.affy.com
1 CTA wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> When I compile my code the JDK says the java.lang.Object is not found. What
> is the reason for this problem?
>
> Thanks.
> Mauricio Crist
John Summerfield writes:
> Someone mentioned offline (please, all, keep discussion ON the list) that
> it's possible to force garbage collection. My code has the necessary
> statements to do that (two versions that I found).
If (as someone else indicated) Sun's JVM uses a conservative garbage
col
I've put in checks in our code to check is things are getting finalized... It does
happen (eventually)
To force cleanups, I rely on the following:
1.add a void kill() in all heavy classes. make it delete files, close
sockets... etc.
2.In void finalize() I make all references point
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> Andreas Rueckert wrote:
>
> > Yep! It's just an easier way to start the JVM.
> >
>
> And not really.
> I haven't managed to get classes in packages running directly from the shell. Has
> anybody done so?
Not yet under Linux, but I've done it unde
Hi,
When I compile my code the JDK says the java.lang.Object is not found. What
is the reason for this problem?
Thanks.
Mauricio Cristal
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> Very strange.
> I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed 'finelize'),
> but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
> I use the same jdk on Linux 5.1, kernel 2.0.34.
I thought this was it as I use j
Hi,
I am preparing a study about Java performance, which first release is about
to be published in the Java Lobby site. I have benchmarked a number of VMs
for the Win32 platform (JDKs 1.0.2/1.1.7/1.2, Microsoft VMs, and also the
TowerJ natives) and analysed their performance and memory usage.
I
> >I18N
> >JDK
> >JRE
> >RT
> >
> >Which do I need. and what are they all ?
> >
> >My guesses are -
> >
> >JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
> >JRE - runtime environment (for distribution)
> >I18N - internationalization (do I need to install on top of JDK / JRE ?)
> >RT - no idea
>
> Close - ve
On Tue, 5 Jan 1999, Manfred Hauswirth wrote:
> Even more confusing is the follwoing statement (Bug Id 4102959, State Closed,
> will not be fixed) :
>
> "According to the bugs database, this is only the third time that anyone's
> noticed that we've never implemented class finalization. --
>
> Hi!
>
> What was that #define that were supposed to be commented out to get TYA 1.2 to
> work with Swing, even though it tries to disable JIT during init?
#define IGNORE_DISABLE at first lines of tya.c.
Unfortunately I've forgotten to switch this by default before
releasing.
Cheers,
Albrecht
I'm trying to install the java plugin (activator) and when I launch
netscape, it says:
icapc36:~ $ netscape
ERROR: /home/shaman/.netscape/plugins/javaplugin.so: undefined symbol: stat
Cant load plugin /home/shaman/.netscape/plugins/javaplugin.so. Ignored.
I used the glibc version since I use Red
Though this is not directly Java-Linux related, I think it is important to
mention this on this mailing list, since it is important to distinguish Java
problems from Java-on-Linux problems (if there are problems with Java on
Linux, people tend to blame it on Linux ...):
The finalize() issue se
On Tue, 05 Jan 1999 14:18:15 + (GMT), Philip Nelson wrote:
>On the Blackdown web / FTP site there are four packages -
>
>I18N
>JDK
>JRE
>RT
>
>Which do I need. and what are they all ?
>
>My guesses are -
>
>JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
>JRE - runtime environment (for distribution)
>I1
On the Blackdown web / FTP site there are four packages -
I18N
JDK
JRE
RT
Which do I need. and what are they all ?
My guesses are -
JDK - Developer's Kit (includes JRE)
JRE - runtime environment (for distribution)
I18N - internationalization (do I need to install on top of JDK / JRE ?)
RT - no
Is there anyone running JStreet Mailer under Linux.
I tried this and it hangs on startup - the GUI appears, I can manipulate the menu, but
nothing happens. Message at bottom says "Retrieving messages".
TIA
Philip Nelson
(using OS/2 Warp 4 and PM-Mail)
E-mail : [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Web : http:
Andreas Rueckert wrote:
> Yep! It's just an easier way to start the JVM.
>
And not really.
I haven't managed to get classes in packages running directly from the shell. Has
anybody done so?
Dimitris
John Summerfield wrote:
> > There was talk of them releasing their JVM for
> > Linux ... I'm really looking forward to that.
>
> I don't know about JVM: I saw a mention of the x86 JIT here.
Isn't that the same thing? Or can you plug
one JIT into any JVM?
Rich.
--
- Richard Jones. Linux c
On Jan 5, 1:30pm, Eduard Boukhman wrote:
> Subject: Re: finalizer()
> On Jan 5, 1:22pm, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> > Subject: Re: finalizer()
> > Very strange.
> > I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed
> 'finelize'),
> > but it didn't work with jre (it finished without
On Jan 5, 1:22pm, Catalin CLIMOV wrote:
> Subject: Re: finalizer()
> Very strange.
> I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed
'finelize'),
> but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
> I use the same jdk on Linux 5.1, kernel 2.0.34.
>
> Cata
Very strange.
I tried to run your code and it worked fine with java (it displayed 'finelize'),
but it didn't work with jre (it finished without displaying anything).
I use the same jdk on Linux 5.1, kernel 2.0.34.
Catalin CLIMOV.
John Summerfield wrote:
> I have this code:
> public class F
>
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Richard Jones wrote:
> Michael Thome wrote:
> > Now, if only those IBM Alphaworks guys would release the VM-side
> > code and/or spec for their profiler (Jinsight) project so us Linux
> > users could benefit, too...
>
> There was talk of them releasing their JVM for
> Linux .
I have this code:
public class F
{
protected void finalize() throws Throwable
{
System.out.println("finalize");
super.finalize();
}
public static void main(String[] args) throws Throwable
{
F f = new F();
Sy
On Mon, 4 Jan 1999, Mauricio Cristal wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I know that it likes a stupid question, but I had set and export the
> CLASSPATH to the directory (/usr/local/OB3.1/ob/lib) where the classes are
> and the JDK didn't find the called methods in the program.
On my RedHat system, I have this
Hi!
On Mon, 04 Jan 1999 Peter Schuller wrote:
>> I believe that you can compile Java support into your kernel, or perhaps
>> as a module. In other words, what you want does exist. Check into
>> building a new kernel or using modules.
>
>AFAIK, the kernel support only entails recognition of .cla
25 matches
Mail list logo
