>The diffs we have are publicly available when we have a port done.
>All of the 1.1.x diffs had been posted.
Unfortunately, Sun didn't give me the option of obtaining the 1.1.x sources.
>
>As to 1.2 (Java 2) there are different licensing rules that we are under
>at the moment.
I'll take your
On Mon, 01 Feb 1999 15:15:40 -0800, Rob Schoening wrote:
>
>> We still don't have anything to work with though, or even
>>acknoledgement that someone who is dealing with the situation has seen
>>my request yet. If this was a truly open source project, we'd have
>>already gotten to the code and fi
Hi-
Has anyone put together a test suite for Sun's HPI? I'm struggling my way
through the process of porting the JDK to BeOS, but due to the lack of
documentation, I am realizing that the HPI is going to be difficult to debug
without building the entire VM and running the tests in java. The P
UNSUBSCRIBE
Out of curiosity, how is this policy (of not being able to release any
source code) affected, if at all, by the new Java license, if and when it
applies to the platform? Can source code be distributed in patch form
(as it normally is anyhow) before the finished product passes the JCK,
under the ne
> We still don't have anything to work with though, or even
>acknoledgement that someone who is dealing with the situation has seen
>my request yet. If this was a truly open source project, we'd have
>already gotten to the code and fixed it by now :). Instead, we have to
>wait for someone to give
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Seth M. Landsman wrote:
> > We still don't have anything to work with though, or even
> > acknoledgement that someone who is dealing with the situation has seen
> > my request yet. If this was a truly open source project, we'd have
> > already gotten to the code and fixed it
> Sean Kellner writes:
Sean> Darren Steven wrote:
>>
>> Sean Kellner wrote:
>>
>> > The status report lists that the current holdup is in a threading
>> > issue. So is there any way to create a new piece of source that would
>> > display the problem without any
> We still don't have anything to work with though, or even
> acknoledgement that someone who is dealing with the situation has seen
> my request yet. If this was a truly open source project, we'd have
> already gotten to the code and fixed it by now :). Instead, we have to
> wait for someone to
Darren Steven wrote:
>
> Sean Kellner wrote:
>
> > The status report lists that the current holdup is in a threading
> > issue. So is there any way to create a new piece of source that would
> > display the problem without any restrictions from Sun? This would allow
> > quite a few kernel hack
> I am trying to run a java application on a remote machine with the control
> panel appearing on my hamm 2.0.36 Debian box. It used to work on a
> different, pre-libc6 Debian box. It presently works on a Solaris machine,
> invoking the program via ssh, but when I try to start the program runnin
I am trying to run a java application on a remote machine with the control
panel appearing on my hamm 2.0.36 Debian box. It used to work on a
different, pre-libc6 Debian box. It presently works on a Solaris machine,
invoking the program via ssh, but when I try to start the program running
via ss
On your home page there is written, that ports for x86 are ready,
couldn't you give it for beta test to developers??
Thank you
P@
--
-
Save software competition, use Linux and Java!
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
John Summerfield wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Scot E. Wilcoxon wrote:
>
> > Anyone have an estimate of the minimum configuration
> > needed for the Linux JRE? That is, what's the smallest
> > system which can run Linux Java programs, not the JDK?
> > (I happen to be wondering about 486 12M RAM
I had the same thing. I modified the simplicity script and added my
classpath entries AFTER the ones under the Simplicity installation directory
Maureen Lecuona
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
> perhaps the CLASSPATH?
>
> "Schultz, Will" wrote:
>
> > I must not be doing something right. I downloaded
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999 16:57:16 +0100 (CET), Frank B. Brokken wrote:
>Dear listmembers,
>
>I ran into a weird problem: I'm probably overlooking something, but
>somehow I don't see what it is.
>
>I have the following small application (using jdk 1.1.7-v1a, on a glibc based
>Linux system)
>
>public
This question has nothing to do with Linux, it's really not
appropriate here.
>c = Class.forName("String");
>java.lang.ClassNotFoundException: String
>c = Class.forName("java.lang.String");
You have to use the full package name if you're using reflection-l
Dear listmembers,
I ran into a weird problem: I'm probably overlooking something, but
somehow I don't see what it is.
I have the following small application (using jdk 1.1.7-v1a, on a glibc based
Linux system)
public class classname
{
public static void main(String args[])
{
On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Scot E. Wilcoxon wrote:
> The FAQ has vague references to JDK resource needs.
>
> Anyone have an estimate of the minimum configuration
> needed for the Linux JRE? That is, what's the smallest
> system which can run Linux Java programs, not the JDK?
> (I happen to be wonderi
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Scot E. Wilcoxon wrote:
>
> > The FAQ has vague references to JDK resource needs.
> >
> > Anyone have an estimate of the minimum configuration
> > needed for the Linux JRE? That is, what's the smallest
> > system which can run
And lo, the chronicles report that Leung Yau Wai spake thusly unto the masses:
>
> so... I would like like to check it out using JAVA!
>
It can't be done, so you *have* to do it using native code (JNI). Sorry,
but that's the way it is.
--
¤--
The status report lists that the current holdup is in a threading
issue. So is there any way to create a new piece of source that would
display the problem without any restrictions from Sun? This would allow
quite a few kernel hackers to go over it and at least see if the bug is
in linuxthreads
On Mon, 1 Feb 1999, Urban Widmark wrote:
> You could let the JNI part of your program try to detect endianness:
> char tmp[2];
> short *s = (short *) tmp;
> tmp[0] = 0xaa;
> tmp[1] = 0xbb;
> if(s == 0xbbaa)
> ; /* little, x86 etc */
> else
>
I need to open an html document stored in a subdirectory. I am trying to
create an JeditorPane with the "file:/images/doc.html" parameter (I
tried other too), but I get 'not file found ' Exceptions.
On Sun, 31 Jan 1999, Leung Yau Wai wrote:
> On Sat, 30 Jan 1999, Aaron Gaudio wrote:
>
> Many people will feel I very strange since I would like to know
> the system endianess. Since I am working JNI so I need to concern about
> it. So, I think I can determine it from the System property
First off, all class methods are NOT static. That's why you have to use
the static keyword. Static implies that the method or member variable is
a Class object, and will not be copied into instance space. Therefore, a
static method has no enclosing instance of the class.
What that means for you i
Hi all,
if i have a program like:
public class myclass extends Frame
{
public static void main( String argv[] )
{
MakeControlWindow();
}
public void MakeControlWindow()
{
//some stuff
27 matches
Mail list logo
