On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Carlo E. Prelz wroteSee added comments to code:
> Subject: Re: little endian & big endian
> Date: Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 06:00:22PM -0800
>
> Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> > > I now have two different opinions. Some say Java is big-endian, some
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Brad Pepers wrote:
> If I wasn't lazy it should be fairly easy to find somewhere in
> the Java specs that tells you what endian is used for the data
> written out.
Okay, I did a grep on the VMSpec docs and found out:
Section 1.8: The Java Instruction Set
"The number and si
Quite simple: in the second method he creates an array of zero length
because he sets llen to f.length(). Well as we already discussed, the
file will appear to have zero length, which means llen == 0 and
when he initializes b, he uses new byte[len]...a zero-length array. Therefore
it makes perfect
Hi,
I thought I would pass along some good news. The porters ran with plan B
and so we now have a working green_threads version that can and does run
the JCK to completion without hanging on both x86 and ppc. We still have
to find and fix all of the errors reported by the JCK, but at least now
Timothy Murphy wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 06:00:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Class files and serialized objects are MSB. The endianness of the VM
> > itself is implementation dependent; however, if you could devise a
> > pure-Java program that could detect the endianness o
And lo, the chronicles report that Dimitris Vyzovitis spake thusly unto the masses:
>
> > less and more both worked, but you are right, it is zero length. But
> > why should that prevent Java from reading it (in fact I see it that someon
> > else has tried it and succeeded). After all, stdin is z
Absolutely.
-dave
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Timothy Murphy wrote:
> Couldn't one write an int to a file,
> and then read it as a character array?
> [Just a slightly random thought.]
>
> --
> Timothy Murphy
> e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> tel: +353-1-2842366
> s-mail: School of Mathematics, Trinity
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 06:00:22PM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Class files and serialized objects are MSB. The endianness of the VM
> itself is implementation dependent; however, if you could devise a
> pure-Java program that could detect the endianness of the VM, you
> would have found a
> less and more both worked, but you are right, it is zero length. But
> why should that prevent Java from reading it (in fact I see it that someon
> else has tried it and succeeded). After all, stdin is zero length before
> you put anything into it. As long as reading does not get and end-of-file
Jerry Treweek wrote:
>> From the number of requests for info on the Java 2 port, it would seem
that there are many other out there who are under pressure to move to
Java 2. I've now developed a remote executor which allows for remote
compilation of java. We will use this until Java 2 is release a
And lo, the chronicles report that Dimitris Vyzovitis spake thusly unto the masses:
>
>
> Aaron Gaudio wrote:
>
> > Isn't this a little over-complicated? Couldn't one just open up the file
> > like any other normal file in Java and then read from it? I admit I
> > haven't tried it myself.
> >
>
Steve,
I could not download jdk1.1.6v2 from your site after trying all of the
hyperlinks on http://java.blackdown.org/~sbb that link to
http://java.blackdown.org/java-linux/Mirrors.cgi
The response was that the requested url was not found.
Hope you can help.
Peter Gaze
Network Analyst
Telstra
Dimitris Vyzovitis wrote:
>
> Aaron Gaudio wrote:
>
> > Isn't this a little over-complicated? Couldn't one just open up the file
> > like any other normal file in Java and then read from it? I admit I
> > haven't tried it myself.
> >
>
> /proc contents are special files. They always appear to
Hello,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hey all...
>
> I'm looking to see if anybody knows where I can find some recent benchmarks
> results for the Linux JDK on x86... Preferably, but not necessarily, with
> CaffeineMark or JMark benchmarks... It would definitely help to have
> results WRT differ
Hey all...
I'm looking to see if anybody knows where I can find some recent benchmarks
results for the Linux JDK on x86... Preferably, but not necessarily, with
CaffeineMark or JMark benchmarks...
It would definitely help to have
results WRT different configurations... i.e. Using TYA, native
Aaron Gaudio wrote:
> Isn't this a little over-complicated? Couldn't one just open up the file
> like any other normal file in Java and then read from it? I admit I
> haven't tried it myself.
>
/proc contents are special files. They always appear to have size 0 but you
can always cat them for
Has the blackdown Linux JDK (1.1.x) been benchmarked on x86
configurations with CaffeineMark or JMark? If so, what were the
results?
Does the 1.1.x version feature a JIT?
Thanks,
-Sheila
Isn't this a little over-complicated? Couldn't one just open up the file
like any other normal file in Java and then read from it? I admit I
haven't tried it myself.
And lo, the chronicles report that Chris Abbey spake thusly unto the masses:
>
> Do a runtime exec of "cat /proc/meminfo" and atta
Brilliant!
Pooh Bear -- "I am just a bear of little brain"
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Jerry Treweek wrote:
> Why don't we create a new interest channel for 1.2 (or 2) questions. That
> will strip a lot of crud out of this channel, and the porting team and any
> other patiently waiting people can filt
Why don't we create a new interest channel for 1.2 (or 2) questions. That
will strip a lot of crud out of this channel, and the porting team and any
other patiently waiting people can filter it all out into /dev/null...
Just think how much extra planning time you are getting with this coding
pause...the Y10K issues will be non-existent!
#;)
J
P.S. Wow norad..and I just thought they played space invaders..
Pooh Bear -- "I am just a bear of little brain"
On Wed, 3 Feb 1999, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Our organiz
Swing / JFC 1.1 is 100% pure java and therefore can be used with any
JDK 1.1 complient JRE. You should be able to download the tar ball
from sun directly.
Cheers
Chris
Charlie Fulton wrote:
> is swing available to use with your linux port?
>
> thanks,
>
> -Charlie.
>
> btw, great job on the por
I think we should set up a system whereby the people who have paid the
most money to support the blackdown effort get to ask when it is coming
out and the rest can then ask themselves "self, how much am I willing to
do to help support these wonderful porters..who after releasing 1.2 will
get a br
Our organization has adopted Java 2, Swing, and Linux for
mission-critical activities in our environment. Please advise when
JDK1.2 will be shipping for Linux.
We and the President really appreciate the job you've been doing. We
look forward to delivery of JDK1.2 and to restoration of an effectiv
<>
You are looking in the *wrong* place , try these two excellent books on the
Java Virtual machines,
1.) "The Java Virtual Machine by Jon Meyer and Troy Downing (Publisher
O'Reilly)"
2.) "Inside the Java Virtual Machine by Bill Venners ( publisher McGraw - Hill
)
This book is my favorit
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I, by contrast, DO want to know, I'm just not going to ask.
>
> M.
I think that anyone (even deep within his mind) would like to know when
it will be out.
But I also think that we should stop bothering the porters and let them
do their job.
Patience people!
Dimitris
Hi
>From the number of requests for info on the Java 2 port, it would seem
that there are many other out there who are under pressure to move to
Java 2. I've now developed a remote executor which allows for remote
compilation of java. We will use this until Java 2 is release and
stable, so we ca
On Wed, 03 Feb 1999 02:25:26 PST, alexander lang wrote:
>Hi,
>
>Do you know where I can get a JRE 1.1.5 (for LINUX). Will higher
>versions of jre be compatible with code compiled with a lower jdk?
Yes, the JRE 1.1.7 should run all older JRE 1.1.x code and most all
JRE 1.0.2 code (they claim al
> > On a small-endian machine, the values would only be converted to
> > big-endian when they're written to a file, or sent out over the network.
>
> Actually, I was wondering whether the Java Language Spec says anything
> about what byte order should prevail. I searched for it but couldn't
> fi
Hi,
Do you know where I can get a JRE 1.1.5 (for LINUX). Will higher
versions of jre be compatible with code compiled with a lower jdk?
Thank you very much.
__
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
Subject: Re: little endian & big endian
Date: Wed, Feb 03, 1999 at 08:48:11AM +0200
Quoting Carlo E. Prelz ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> Wed Feb 3 07:45:55 eccolo:~/test <^_^> java Test_endian
> First byte: a
> Second byte: b
> Wed Feb 3 07:46:22 eccolo:~/test <^_^>
Ah, no... first
Subject: Re: little endian & big endian
Date: Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 06:00:22PM -0800
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
> > I now have two different opinions. Some say Java is big-endian, some
> > say it depends which machine it's on. Who's right? Proofs, please.
>
>
32 matches
Mail list logo
