A number of folks pointed out in reply to my earlier note
that the Linux JDK does not provide a default JIT. I ran
tests with the TYA JIT on Linux and with the JIT on Win98
disabled. While the results on Win98 did slow down to
almost exactly the same speed as Linux, the converse was
not true.
E
David Wall wrote:
>
> >This makes me wonder.
> >AFAIK, according to their definition, threads are supposed to be
> "lightweight"
> >processes.
I think a lot of people are getting hung up on the notion of lightweight
vs heavyweight processes. Here's the quick definition of the
differences, follow
Joachim Breuer wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> As can be seen on http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/info.html, your
> web site has last been touched on 98/12/17 with the remark that
> 1.2/Java2 is sorta running and to be expected in at most one month.
>
> I do understand that there might be some time-co
Logi Ragnarsson wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I'm one of those eagerly awaiting the arrival of jdk1.2 for linux, but
> in the short term all I really need is the collections API. (I'm going
> to write abstract algebra/group theory classes and subclassing Set
> seems like a good idea.) Does anyone know if i
You can use the collections API in JDK1.1. Just download the binary .jar
files that sun has up on the java beans website. If you can not find it
I can email you the copy I have.
Mo DeJong
dejong at cs.umn.edu
On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Logi Ragnarsson wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm one of those eagerly awaitin
Hello!
As can be seen on http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/info.html, your
web site has last been touched on 98/12/17 with the remark that
1.2/Java2 is sorta running and to be expected in at most one month.
I do understand that there might be some time-consuming and very valid
reasons for the
Hi!
I'm one of those eagerly awaiting the arrival of jdk1.2 for linux, but
in the short term all I really need is the collections API. (I'm going
to write abstract algebra/group theory classes and subclassing Set
seems like a good idea.) Does anyone know if it would be possible to
simply use the
I don't know much about the specifics of linuxthreads, but pthreads are
usually implemented with a group of kernel threads (supplied by clone()
syscall in this case, and they're definitely "light-weight" processes).
Perhaps, they've been referred to as "heavy-weight" just as a term
relative to gre
> Dimitris Vyzovitis writes:
Dimitris> This makes me wonder. AFAIK, according to their
Dimitris> definition, threads are supposed to be "lightweight"
Dimitris> processes. How are linuxthreads actually implemented?
Dimitris> ie, do we get the real lightweight process that we
>This makes me wonder.
>AFAIK, according to their definition, threads are supposed to be
"lightweight"
>processes.
>How are linuxthreads actually implemented? ie, do we get the real
lightweight
>process that we are supposed to get by the pthreads definitions?
>The descriptions seen in the discussi
The JDK1.1.7 port from blackdown does not come with a JIT compiler.
This will make it much slower than the Windows version which does
have a JIT compiler. You should also keep in mind that benchmarks
are almost always wrong. You need to see how the speed differs with
an application, not a benchmar
> Cliff Kotnik writes:
Cliff> I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
Cliff> the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for SUN's Win32
Cliff> JDK vs. the Linux JDK are so disappointing, I wonder if I've
Cliff> made some goof in running the tests. Any help woul
Gerald Gutierrez wrote:
>
>
> Non-Java processes don't have the problem because "processes" are
> heavyweight native threads, essentially. Non-Java threads MAY have the
> problem if they are not native threads.
>
> Assuming you are talking about Linux when you talk about G++, yes Linux
> implemen
I decided to test the performance of my home machine with
the CaffineMark benchmark. The results for SUN's Win32
JDK vs. the Linux JDK are so disappointing, I wonder if I've
made some goof in running the tests. Any help would be
appreciated.
Hardware: Del XPS R400 PII 400 MHz 128M
Software:
On Sun, 7 Feb 1999, Wim Ceulemans wrote:
> Can the sunwjit be used in combination with the latest JDK1.1.x on Linux?
No, the JIT interface in Java 2 is very different from that in JDK1.1.
Nigel Gamble[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mountain View, CA, USA.
Can the sunwjit be used in combination with the latest JDK1.1.x on Linux?
>> Albrecht Kleine writes:
>
>>> 1.2 for i386 includes sunwjit. The port isn't finished yet and so it
>>> doesn't make much sense to show benchmark results now.
>
>
>Albrecht> Does that mean tha the sunwjit
16 matches
Mail list logo
