>Maybe we could add a "Asking when 1.2 will be done will result in
>unsubscription from this list and subscription to as many AOL spam lists
>as possible. Don't ask!!"
I'm starting to get the feeling that many in this group are approaching
"when will 1.2 be out" messages with a very dishearteni
>> `` System.runFinalizersOnExit(true) ''
>>
>> Does this work/implemented on Blackdown JDK 1.1.7-1a or not?
There was some discusion of this in the past... check the archives if you
weren't around or don't keep the old list messages. some of that discusion
may interest you. IIRC it works in the
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Jason Meisel wrote:
> HI i am working on a senior project using RMI and Servlets on a linux os
> running on a i86 machine... i have installed the jdk, jre, and rt, and have
> adjusted the PATH to reflect where to look...
> my problem is...
> when i type : javac Hello.java
> Jason Meisel writes:
Jason> HI i am working on a senior project using RMI and Servlets
Jason> on a linux os running on a i86 machine... i have installed
Jason> the jdk, jre, and rt, and have adjusted the PATH to reflect
Jason> where to look... my problem is... when i type
HI i am working on a senior project using RMI and Servlets on a linux os
running on a i86 machine... i have installed the jdk, jre, and rt, and have
adjusted the PATH to reflect where to look...
my problem is...
when i type : javac Hello.java
it says cannot find library path... have you any id
I know I'm going to get kicked in the teeth for this question but
I'm going to ask anyway. (BTW I have searched the mailing list
archive and can't find an answer to this question). I have signed
the Java source Non-commerical license and have downloaded the source
to jdk1.2. The question is it
Dear list,
Is there a version of the jdk that runs with glibc 2.1? If so where can I
find it?
Thanks,
Ken
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thomas Down wrote:
>
> I haven't seen this mentioned on the list yet so...
>
> There are some details about how the Java 2 port is getting on with
> passing the JCK online at:
>
> http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/jck-status.html
>
> This is just the information we want to see---many thank
On Tue, 23 Feb 1999, Albrecht Kleine wrote:
> Hi,
The new license may be "less restricted" but it
is clearly not "more free".
> I've heard that it is possible to get
> JDK sources in a much relaxed way than earlier.
>
> I know, this is no lawyer's list, but perhaps some
> of you can write ab
>
> Hey there everyone.
>
> I'm having a problem with AWT under jdk117a for linux. If I click on
> checkboxes, buttons, etc. quite quickly, the widget often enters some
> intermediate state... the widget depressed while the mouse is over it, and
> raised when the mouse is not. Sometimes the
Any recommendations on MkLinux vs. LinuxPPC for running Java software?
This will be installed on a Powerbook 3400c.
Thanks,
Carl
**
Carl H. Sayres
Software Engineer
Data Representations, Inc.
P.O. Box 519
Summit, NJ 07902-0519
(908)918-0396 x5 voice
(908)918-0397fax
[EMAIL
Hey there everyone.
I'm having a problem with AWT under jdk117a for linux. If I click on
checkboxes, buttons, etc. quite quickly, the widget often enters some
intermediate state... the widget depressed while the mouse is over it, and
raised when the mouse is not. Sometimes the reverse happen
I haven't seen this mentioned on the list yet so...
There are some details about how the Java 2 port is getting on with
passing the JCK online at:
http://www.blackdown.org/java-linux/jck-status.html
This is just the information we want to see---many thanks to everyone in
the porting team. On
Hi,
I am trying to port a third party package for the Linux JDK and face
deallocation problems (~pointer is corrupted or freed more than once).
I have installed the latest package of the jdk 1.1.7 v1a with native
thread support.
The problem occurs systematically when a native method allocate s
Not that I've studied the terms in detail (I have managed to avoid the
need for Sun source so far), but Sun's terms are still structured to
generate income. They're definitely not GPL! The big difference is that
you pay Sun when you deploy rather than when you develop -- it's easy to
get the sourc
Hi,
I've heard that it is possible to get
JDK sources in a much relaxed way than earlier.
I know, this is no lawyer's list, but perhaps some
of you can write about license compatibility to GPL?
For example I've written the TYA JIT under clean room
conditions, but looking on JDK sources would
p
Hi,
just released the JIT compiler TYA1.2-version4 on
ftp://gonzalez.cyberus.ca/pub/Linux/java/tya12v4.tgz
(size is 125031 byte)
Some release notes: most important are
Kazuyuki Shudo's fix for better interfacing with 2.2. kernels.
Thanks! And we have some minor speedup in CM3 benchmark, but n
> However, even so, shouldn't class files as opposed to source
> files normally be readable by anyone? That was not the case here.
> My class files seem to be readable only by owner and group, not everyone.
Your umask is probably set to 027. Check it by typing 'umask.' If it
is set, you can ma
> I do not, however, use my system under "root" *except* when absolutely
> required (as in, when doing admin work). This is a good habit to be
> in since it tends to reduce your chances of really getting messed up
> or having some unwanted access into your system. It also helps
> identify things
> Now for the wierd part. It all works just fine when I am logged in as
> root. But when logged in as myself, java reports that it can't find my
> class. What could cause this? I have loaded up my javawrapper script
> with a bunch of echo statements and am convinced that it produces the
> same
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> `` System.runFinalizersOnExit(true) ''
>
> Does this work/implemented on Blackdown JDK 1.1.7-1a or not?
>
> I find it does __not__ work for me ?
Same here.
> Anyone know the reason why?
I'd like to know that too. The JDK docs say that it's uns
Well I hope you they invent the API
`System.onJVMExit( ExitNotifiable myIWannaBeNotifiedAtExitObject )'
Otherwise how can we be sure that resources are released
when the JVM exits. That temporary file creating utility
object class will be soon redundant then, won't it?
( I guess this also touc
I don't know if it works in the blackdown port.
I only know that the problem with running finalizers is that they get
called sequencely and that leads to problems, because in a complex
reference structure they shouldn't get called sequencely but depending
on the structure, but that's very difficu
No, this isn't a 1.2 question. :-) I'm already using JDK 1.1.7 on Linux
with JSP, but would be interested to know how well the JVM works under
the processor used with the Cobalt Qube (MIPS I think). Anyone have any
experience/knowledge with this?
Also/alternatively, how well it runs on a Netwinde
`` System.runFinalizersOnExit(true) ''
Does this work/implemented on Blackdown JDK 1.1.7-1a or not?
I find it does __not__ work for me ?
Meaning no finalizers are called when the JVM terminates.
However I tested the same code on Solaris/Sun JDK and it works!
Anyone know the reason why?
( An
Karl Asha wrote:
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
begin: vcard
fn: shobhan Kumar
n: Kumar;shobhan
org:
26 matches
Mail list logo