sure I'm having a brain fart but the code snippet below always generates an
IOException(read error). The file and and permissions are ok. It reads the
first line writes the new file then generates the exception. I'd appreciate
any help.
Joel McCarty
Last !
Where is JDK 1.2
Just I joke I wanted the honor of posting the last of the WHERE JDK
1.2 messages : )
No rush I'll be on vaction this weekend : )
Mike
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
My apologies to the list for my apparently misguided remarks re. buying new
hardware.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Does anybody know of a good way of making jdk1.1.7 (and even 1.2 when it
is out) with AcceleratedX 4.1 (full installation - all development libs
present)?
I tried to install it in a machine that has it, and it simply didn't
work (the _Xglobal lock or sth, I don't remember right now). When I
unins
approve
I took a closer look at the agreement. My interpretation is that, it only places
restriction on the blackdown porting team which cannot make any money off the
Java 3D port. It places no such restriction on the developer who should be free
to deploy their application for commercial purpo
Augusto Sellhorn writes:
> interfaces (APIs): Java 3D (TM) API, Java Media Framework API, Java
> Advanced Imaging API and Java Sound API
> platform-independent, network-centric applications for educational,
> business and technical users with the
> easy-to-use Java Media APIs.
Personally, I
At 12:10 AM 3/4/99 -0800, Kevin Ryan wrote:
>The 1.1.7v1a JDK runs great on my AMD DX4-100 w/32Mb RAM.
>
>Since one can get something roughly 20x as fast as my machine for $500
>these days, I'm not sure I understand why agonizing over the JDK's
>performance on a 486/33 is worthwhile.
>
Maybe beca
Hello,
I found out that using the Invocation API changes the behaviour of
printf/scanf (output of floating point numbers)
See the small test program appended. Can someone explain why this happens?
I remember that one had to set an environment variable (LOCALE or something
similar) on Solaris to
At 11:01 PM 3/3/99 -0500, Daniel Dulitz wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
>> board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
>> times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a des
> "FBB" == Frank B Brokken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
FBB> Dear Java-list members, I'm looking for parser and scanner
FBB> generators that produce Java sourcefiles, comparable to bison
FBB> and flex. I once had a reference for a parser generator
FBB> producing java sources, b
Reported by LinuxToday:
Alan Cox says:
I've put Linux 2.0.37pre8 out on ftp://ftp.linux.org.uk:/pub/linux/alan .
This for most people will be an uninteresting release.
It contains a first cut pentium III serial number disabler and also a fix for
a bug in the IP_MULTICAST_IF getsockopt. Th
Frank B. Brokken wrote:
>
> Dear Java-list members,
>
> I'm looking for parser and scanner generators that produce Java
> sourcefiles, comparable to bison and flex. I once had a reference for a parser
> generator producing java sources, but I lost the reference. I *do* have
> references voor
It's in this URL
http://www.news.com/News/Item/0,4,33261,00.html
To be exact ...
+===
LINUXWORLD, SAN JOSE, Calif., March 2 /PRNewswire/ -- Sun Microsystems,
Inc. (Nasdaq: SUNW -
news) today announced that it has licensed its l
I didn't find this statement at the URL you provided.
-dave
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Ron Yorston wrote:
> >From the Sun announcement:
>
> >This agreement enables the Linux community to develop and distribute
> >media-enhanced applications for the Java 2 platform for non-commercial use.
>
> Why the
>From the Sun announcement:
>This agreement enables the Linux community to develop and distribute
>media-enhanced applications for the Java 2 platform for non-commercial use.
Why the limitation to non-commercial use? Maybe I don't understand the
terms, but the licence on the Sun site for other
Check out: http://www.ANTLR.org/
Ken
On Thu, 4 Mar 1999, Frank B. Brokken wrote:
> Dear Java-list members,
>
> I'm looking for parser and scanner generators that produce Java
> sourcefiles, comparable to bison and flex. I once had a reference for a parser
> generator producing java so
Dear Java-list members,
I'm looking for parser and scanner generators that produce Java
sourcefiles, comparable to bison and flex. I once had a reference for a parser
generator producing java sources, but I lost the reference. I *do* have
references voor lexical scanner generators, e.g.,
The 1.1.7v1a JDK runs great on my AMD DX4-100 w/32Mb RAM.
Since one can get something roughly 20x as fast as my machine for $500
these days, I'm not sure I understand why agonizing over the JDK's
performance on a 486/33 is worthwhile.
Linux itself, of course, will run great even on a 386/25 with
On Wed, 3 Mar 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Running Blackdown 1.1.7 with linux 2.0.36 on an Elan SC400 development
> board (486, 33 MHz, no floating point unit) results in extremely long load
> times (up to an hour or more) for applets that load quickly on a desktop
> linux system. After loadi
Hi,
There is no need to set the CLASSPATH if u are using the BlackDown's jdk
and u installed it normally. All u need to do is to set the PATH to where
the java* binaries are present. u might need a CLASSPATH if u plan to use
swing or some 3rd party uitlity classes. I think that the LD_LIBRARY_PAT
20 matches
Mail list logo
