Anand Palaniswamy writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph H. Buehler) writes:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
> >
> > > Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> > > memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> > > heap
Jens M Andreasen writes:
> Alan Cox has put out a new kernel to solve the multicast issue
>
> ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/alan/2.0.37pre/2.0.37-pre-patch-8.bz2
It solves one problem, but seems to uncover some others. I'm going to do a
closer analysis of what's going on, but now tha
Alan Cox has put out a new kernel to solve the multicast issue
ftp://ftp.uk.linux.org/pub/linux/alan/2.0.37pre/2.0.37-pre-patch-8.bz2
(
)
--c[]--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---C---
Anand Palaniswamy wrote:
>
> Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > > The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
> >
> > But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one
> > particular case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just
> > bec
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Joseph H. Buehler) writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
>
> > Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> > memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> > heap "shrinking").
>
> Are you sure about that? I
> Daniel Dulitz writes:
Daniel> Kevin White writes:
>> I am having a tough time piecing together the (lack of)
>> documentation on using native code to actually allocate (and
>> call the constructor of) a new object. Can someone please
>> point me to an example? I have a
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Anand Palaniswamy) writes:
> Another bad side effect of this limitation is that the famous "return
> memory to OS" bug can not be implemented on Linux (ie, there is no
> heap "shrinking").
Are you sure about that? I use GNU emacs a lot and just tried an
experiment on a machin
Peter Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
>
> But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one
> particular case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just
> because the *maximum* heap size is higher?
Kevin White writes:
> I am having a tough time piecing together the (lack of) documentation on
> using native code to actually allocate (and call the constructor of) a
> new object. Can someone please point me to an example? I have a java
> class that needs to be constructed by some native code.
Kevin White writes:
> I am working on a java wrapper for a linux library that uses files to
> open(), read(), and issue ioctl() calls to a device. I assume I can
> open() and read() the device file as I would any standard file in java.
Yes. Be careful not to use Buffered{Input,Output}Stream wi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
> The reason for this is that the default -Xmx value is 64MB.
But that's the *maximum* heap size; why does JDK 2.0 consume, in one particular
case, 50 megs of RAM when JDK 1.1 consumed 15 megs, just because the *maximum*
heap size is higher? Does th
Dear sir,
I use linux OS.
I want to include a "C" function for writing into sound card in a
real-time application using the "JNI".
I wrote the "C" function and created the corresponding header files. When
I try to compile the "C" file, it gives an error message saying that the
header file "jn
I am having a tough time piecing together the (lack of) documentation on
using native code to actually allocate (and call the constructor of) a
new object. Can someone please point me to an example? I have a java
class that needs to be constructed by some native code. It will take 4
parameters
Louis-David Mitterrand <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Has anyone else noticed the fonts (or lack thereof) in Linux-jdk1.2?
> Everything seems to be in "lucida" or is it just me?
In my environment, java or appletviewer warns lack of font
and sometimes go crash.
% java test
Font specified in font
14 matches
Mail list logo
