An (indirect) opportunity for Blackdown funding

1999-03-25 Thread Gary Lawrence Murphy
As the Java-Linux porting team, you seemed the best first-place to ask: Would you be interested in writing a major book on Linux and Java? Can you recommend anyone who might be interested? I'm looking for someone who can devote several months to create a comprehensive reference book to survey

Re: AWT Crash - Need Help!

1999-03-25 Thread Carlos Alberto Roman Zamitiz
I copied your program in my linux box pentium 75 MHz Red Hat 4.2 and VM 1.1.5 and worked very well. I supposed your computer has few memory because I wrote this code in a work station HP and it crashed and generated a core file. In other WS HP with more memory and the frame worked well. greeting

JDK1.2 and CORBA

1999-03-25 Thread Michael Nielsen
Troy Wu wrote: > > I'm not having a problem, really. The situation is that the output of > idltojava compiler of CDK-A doesn't compile with CORBA classes of > CDK-B (Corba Development Kit, that is =). Only runtime object > instances are interoperable; not their source. > > *.java files generat

Re: Red Hat: no GUI due to Debian lib refs

1999-03-25 Thread David A. Guthrie
Please the read the faq. This is all covered in that. You do have libc6.0, its glibc2.0.7 on redhat. Jason Proctor wrote: > I'm running JDK 1.2 pre 1 on Red Hat 5.2, and although I haven't had any > problems whatsoever with the base JDK (great job guys!) I've so far been > locked out of any GUI

FTP-Lib for Java

1999-03-25 Thread Willi Richert
In case you´re interested in FTP under Java, this may of be of interest for you. I know, there are many ftp-clients for java. This is yet another one of which I think the design is cool. If you have suggestions for improvement, mail me. I tested it with proftpd. http://www.richert.de/free/FTP.htm

Red Hat: no GUI due to Debian lib refs

1999-03-25 Thread Jason Proctor
I'm running JDK 1.2 pre 1 on Red Hat 5.2, and although I haven't had any problems whatsoever with the base JDK (great job guys!) I've so far been locked out of any GUI type stuff by the dependence on what I assume to be Debian-specific library references - libstdc++libc6.0-1.so.2 for example. I co

Re: JDK 1.1.8 ??

1999-03-25 Thread Michael Sinz
On Thu, 25 Mar 1999 12:43:07 -0600, Kelly Campbell wrote: >I sent in the license agreement for JDK 1.1 source back in January, but >they gave me 1.2 source. Is there some way to get 1.1 source and the >current linux diffs for it? I'd be more than happy to help work on it if I >can get the sources

Re: JDK 1.1.8 ??

1999-03-25 Thread Kelly Campbell
On Thu, Mar 25, 1999 at 11:36:23AM +0100, Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein wrote: > Uh... what do you mean by "is out"? I've just checked Javasoft and the > current releases for Win32 and Solaris still seem to be 1.2.0 and 1.1.7. http://developer.javasoft.com/ in the early access section. > I second t

Library dependencies for jdk1.2?

1999-03-25 Thread Lindsay Patten
I've been trying to get jdk1.2 or jre1.2 to work on my machine without much success. My system was libc5 based so I fetched glibc-2.0.6 from the gnu mit site (2.0.6 was the latest 2.0.X release there) and installed it. I then installed the glib version of XFree86 3.3.3.1 to get the libXp library

Re: JDK1.2 and CORBA

1999-03-25 Thread Francisco Figueirido
I must say that I found all the messages in response to my question quite interesting. Thanks a lot! After I sent my original mail I tried several things and none has yet quite worked (but I haven't finished my last set of experiments :-). One thing, though: so much for standards! In the book `Cli

Re: [RE: JDBC for Oracle?????]

1999-03-25 Thread Mistae
Hello, I am working in a project where I need to access our intranet database (M$ SQL Server) which has no IP addres, from the internet. I installed rmijdbc server and it allow me to reach the odbc datasources form applets running on netscape navigator but not in Internet explorer. For some reas

Re: JDK 1.1.8 ??

1999-03-25 Thread Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein
> I was just wondering if the jdk team is planning to release a 1.1.8 > version of the JDK now that the reference release is out, or is the port > effort mainly going towards 1.2 now? Uh... what do you mean by "is out"? I've just checked Javasoft and the current releases for Win32 and Solaris st

Re: libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2... and the Linux mess (IMHO)

1999-03-25 Thread Osvaldo Pinali Doederlein
Nathan Meyers wrote: > The choice is to wait for a real release. The porting team has dealt > with a lot of distractions just getting to this point and having reached > it -- a beta release that works quite well -- is no small > accomplishment. But it is a beta, whose purpose in life is to shake

Re: KDE PLAF

1999-03-25 Thread Patrick Ohnewein
Would even be interested, do you have some web page, or do you plan to include it in the jgt project? P@ Andreas Rueckert wrote: > > Hi! > > Somewhat OT(?): > Since I don't like the other PLAFs, I've started to create a KDE PLAF. Far from > completion, but some stuff already works (on JDK 1.1.

RE: JDBC for Oracle?????

1999-03-25 Thread Marcel Ruff
Hello, >1. If I want to use JAVA to access Oracle, can I have to install >JDBC for  ORACLE? Using the JDBC driver from http://www.oracle.com/st/products/jdbc/html/jdbc_collateral.html didn't work well in my case, i could only feed up to 1900 bytes of BLOB (as LONG RAW) data. Bigger sizes only fil