SuSE 6.1 and JDK1.2 prerelease

1999-05-03 Thread Ralph Gauges
Hi, I just tried to install jdk1.2. I am just starting to learn java, so I basically tested some of the small demo applications and they worked. Then I tried to run some IDEs for Java like Freebuilder and Simplicity, but I only get hangups and segmentation faults. Depending on which libstdc++ lib

Re: Java/C benchmark

1999-05-03 Thread SHUDO Kazuyuki
[EMAIL PROTECTED]("J.P.Lewis") wrote: > I primarily wanted to point out the curious fact that the > jit supplied by sun for Windows is much faster than the > jit supplied by sun for Linux, and to ask what this meant. A possible reason is that they are differing implementations. The JIT with JDK

HotSpot

1999-05-03 Thread Steve Byrne
Matt Lord writes: > Do you plan on porting HotSpot if and when Sun releases the source code? If Sun will license us the code, we'll port it. Steve -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe

Seeking source for Linux JDK 1.2 port

1999-05-03 Thread Steve Byrne
Eric House writes: > Hi: > > The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary > to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where? Where does it say that? That's certainly not the case currently. We plan to make the diffs available with the NEXT release

Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc (fwd)

1999-05-03 Thread Chris Abbey
This isn't a fix, but it'll get you around the problem for now... I kid you not, it works with some of the code I run here where people did the same switch logic around rmi. -=Chris java -Djava.version=1.1.7 your.class.here o o \___/ At 12:05 PM 5/3/99 +0100, Peter T Mount wrote: > >[ I'm cc'

Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-03 Thread James Seigel
oh yeah are you using ny image libs? Spencer Marks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 3/5/99 8:22 pm: Make sure you are not using .awt packages because if so you might run into the problem that they require a valid DISPLAY environment variable. (I just encountered a similar situation...) Spencer [EM

JDK 1.2 - Exception - can't load javax.swing.plaf.metal.MetalLookAndFeel

1999-05-03 Thread Al
I set my DefaultColorDepth in my XF86Config file to 16. It did not have a valuefoe it. I did this because the system was complaining that it could not load the colormap. Setting the DefaultColorDepth solved this problem. But it caused my application to die during start up with the following exce

JDK 1.1.7v1 and glibc 2.1.1

1999-05-03 Thread Matt Welsh
Red Hat 6.0 comes with glibc 2.1.1. When attempting to run 'java' from the Blackdown jdk 1.1.7v1 release, we get the error message: /tmp/m/jdk1.1.7v1/bin/../bin/i686/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries: /tmp/m/jdk1.1.7v1/bin/../lib/i686/green_threads/libjava.so: undefined sym

Re: Java/C benchmark

1999-05-03 Thread Chris Abbey
>> but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair... > >hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact, >not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence. I didn't think it was a complaint at all... just can't see the logical basis for

Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-03 Thread Spencer Marks
Make sure you are not using .awt packages because if so you might run into the problem that they require a valid DISPLAY environment variable. (I just encountered a similar situation...) Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Kozubik) writes: > Hi. > > We have a custom server that we wrote in java

Re: javax.swing.preview not found

1999-05-03 Thread Jeff Galyan
Bernardo Paz Betancourt wrote: > > > Ok, thankyou, I understand, my problem is that I dont have the javax package > How could I find it, I´m using Linux 5.2 whith JDK 1.1.7 and there is > not any "javax" in the crs.zip (?) directory. > Ah - under 1.1.x, Swing is a separate download. Get Swing

Re: Installing TYA, been there? done that?

1999-05-03 Thread Chris Abbey
>./configure tells me it can't find my version. it's in your path right? I had the same thing first try because the configure script does `which java` and I hadn't used it yet in that shell (I don't put it in path unless I'm going to use it) so running my setup script fixed that up real quick. -=

RE: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-03 Thread Craig Courtney
If your using jdk117 just look in the readme. It has directions on how to run the jre without X. And if your using the 1.2 pre-release if I remember correctly it states in the readme that it doesn't support running with out X yet, but will in the final release. Craig Courtney [EMAIL PROTECTED]

why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-03 Thread John Kozubik
Hi. We have a custom server that we wrote in java and runs on linux. This custom server does nothing but open and close sockets and transfer a few bits of data here and there - needless to say it just runs off of the command line and that is all there is to it. So, in the interest of building t

Re: Java/C benchmark

1999-05-03 Thread Scott Murray
On Mon, 3 May 1999, J.P.Lewis wrote: > > but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair... > > hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact, > not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence. > I've timed tya across releases, and i

Caldera OpenLinux 2.2 and Jdk 1.1.7

1999-05-03 Thread Peter Antypas
Is the JDK 1.1.7 port compatible with Caldera's OpenLinux 2.2 (2.2 kernel?) I am interested in getting this distribution, primarily for the KDE desktop, but I need to know if the JDK will work first. Thanks in advance, Peter Antypas

Re: Seeking source for Linux JDK 1.2 port

1999-05-03 Thread Paul McLichlan
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Eric House wrote: > The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary > to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where? I only know what I've seen from other replies on this list, but it seems that the patches to JDK 1.2 won't be made av

RE: RedHat 6.0 and Blackdown Java 1.1.7v1a

1999-05-03 Thread ruff
> /../bin/i586/green_threads/java: error in loading shared libraries: ./../lib/i586/green_threads/libjava.so: undefined symbol: _dl_symbol_value I'm using SUSE, checking the directory /lib : nm -A *.so* | grep _dl_symbol_value gives me following result: libc-2.0.7.so:00088d50 T

Re: Java/C benchmark

1999-05-03 Thread J.P.Lewis
> but I'm afraid I have to say your followup comparisons are unfair... hold on - this post was intended to be just a statement of fact, not a complaint. I use blackdown and am very grateful for its existence. I've timed tya across releases, and it's gotten steadily faster over the last 6 month

HotSpot

1999-05-03 Thread Matt Lord
Do you plan on porting HotSpot if and when Sun releases the source code? Thanks, Matt Lord -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Seeking source for Linux JDK 1.2 port

1999-05-03 Thread Eric House
Hi: The blackdown.org web site used to suggest that the patches necessary to build the JDK on Linux were available. Are they still? Where? Thanks, --Eric House Sun Microsystems' Java Software Division -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, ema

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Moses DeJong
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bernd Kreimeier wrote: I just ran your example on my debian 2.1 system and I got the AWT crash you described. I have attached the output of bug.sh to this email in case you want to see it. later mo > > I put all the bits into one source, at >http://www.netaccess.ie/~bk/

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Moses DeJong
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Bernd Kreimeier wrote: > Moses DeJong writes: > > (if you are using Lesstif) > > LD_PRELOAD=libXt.so libXm.so libXext.so > > LD_BIND_NOW=1 Funny thing is that this works on my RedHat 5.2 with 2.1.125 at home but when I run it on a Debian 2.1 system at work I get a segfault

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
I put all the bits into one source, at http://www.netaccess.ie/~bk/bug.tgz I stripped it of all linkage and libdl.so use, so it is just Invocation and Frame.show(). If you'd give it a try? Or somebody with Debian 2.1 stable and JDK 1.1.7v1a+native installed? If this works on your box, then

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
Moses DeJong writes: > (if you are using Lesstif) > LD_PRELOAD=libXt.so libXm.so libXext.so > LD_BIND_NOW=1 I already do LD_PRELOAD with libjava.so (as I use libdl.so). Hmm, could have tried that myself. Using the line you state, with or without pre-loading libjava.so, I get the segfault belo

Re: Problems installing Netbeans

1999-05-03 Thread zun
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Nobby Knox wrote: > My problem is that I cannot get the Netbeans application installed. > Netbeans is a very good Java IDE (in my opinion) and is written entirely > in Java. Also, this is not the only application that will not run on my > Redhat 5.2 system (JDK 1.2). With all

Re: java plug-in

1999-05-03 Thread Alain Renaud
I don't see the need for a direct www connection. We've got a GUI application running under JDK 1.2. The applet version runs well on an intranet with Netscape 4 or higher with the Java 1.2 plug-in for Windows (our applet makes IE 4/5 crash though). It's only that the HTML page with that EMBED tag

Re: Problems installing Netbeans

1999-05-03 Thread Ted X. Toth
Check out jitterbug, the bug database, on the blackdown site and search on libstdc++-libc6.0-1.so.2 I think you'll find a bug report with a work around for your problem (bug id 452 maybe??) Ted Nobby Knox wrote: > Hello everyone. > > This is my first post to this email list. I am also new to Ja

Re: Compilation error

1999-05-03 Thread Oliver Fels
> I have installed JDk 1.2.1, but get an error sometimes when i run certain >applications on Textpad. > > Symantec Java! JustInTime Compiler Version 210.063 for JDK 1.1.3 > Copyright (C) 1996-97 Symantec Corporation > Can't find class symantec/tools/javac/Main > Process completed with exit code

Re: package importing conventions

1999-05-03 Thread Will Koffel
At 4:54 AM -0700 5/3/99, Troy Wu wrote: >I agree that one, large namespace is impractical (see C++ =), but >there are times when it's simply more convenient. Especially since C++ allows you to overload = and it is smart enough to not die at compile time. It just checks what types you have on eac

Re: RedHat 6.0 and Blackdown Java 1.1.7v1a

1999-05-03 Thread Michael Sinz
Tom Bradford wrote: >Hi, > >I have, for the past few days, been trying to get the most recent >release of your 1.1.7v1a port to work on RedHat 6.0. It worked find on 5.2, >but they've upgraded their shared libraries and now, for some reason, the >Java interpreter displays: [...] >Any help wou

Compilation error

1999-05-03 Thread Fred Ginger
I have installed JDk 1.2.1, but get an error sometimes when i run certain applications on Textpad. Symantec Java! JustInTime Compiler Version 210.063 for JDK 1.1.3 Copyright (C) 1996-97 Symantec Corporation Can't find class symantec/tools/javac/Main Process completed with exit code 1 Could any

RedHat 6.0 and Blackdown Java 1.1.7v1a

1999-05-03 Thread Tom Bradford
Hi,   I have, for the past few days, been trying to get the most recent release of your 1.1.7v1a port to work on RedHat 6.0.  It worked find on 5.2, but they've upgraded their shared libraries and now, for some reason, the Java interpreter displays:   ./../bin/i586/green_threads/java: error i

Re: Patches

1999-05-03 Thread Michael Sinz
On Mon, 3 May 1999 15:19:36 +0100, Gerrit Cap wrote: >Hello, > > >Is it possible to get the 'diffs' between the original JDK source tree of >SUN and the source tree used to generate the blackdown port ? For the released JDK we have also released the diffs. We have not done so for the pre-release

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Moses DeJong
I ran into this same problem working on TclBlend (Java access in Tcl). To fix things you will need to set some env vars so that the required libs are preloaded (loaded before your JNI process is started). (if you are using Lesstif) LD_PRELOAD=libXt.so libXm.so libXext.so LD_BIND_NOW=1 (if you ar

Patches

1999-05-03 Thread Gerrit Cap
Hello, Is it possible to get the 'diffs' between the original JDK source tree of SUN and the source tree used to generate the blackdown port ? Regards, Gerrit. Marble Consulting -- Gerrit Cap http://www.ping.be/marble OO Solutions

JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-03 Thread Bernd Kreimeier
hal:/opt/local/java/jdk/lib/i586/native_threads# ldd ./libawt.so libpthread.so.0 => /lib/libpthread.so.0 (0x4004a000) libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40057000) /lib/ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x) nm -D ./libawt.so | grep XtShellStrings U XtShellStrings nm -D libXt.so.6

Re: Possible Java Bug ?

1999-05-03 Thread Michael Emmel
The problem is that you can initialize the local var in the subclass in this situation since you have a handle to them but you cannot initialize the outer class instance viable your self since you cannot get a handle to it. If you hand a instance variable String myString in the Parent2 c

Re: More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

1999-05-03 Thread pridemor
I don't know if this is the problem you are seeing, but I have fixed problems such as you described in our dialog boxes (extends JDialog) by moving a call to setModal from near the bottom of the constructor to the top. It also works fine if you pass true to super() in the constructor. The dialog

Re: Possible Java Bug ?

1999-05-03 Thread Rick Kiss
Hi Michael, I suppose the other folks that didn't respond were, rightly, concerned that the question is not a Linux-Java issue but I will try to addess it anyway since you brought it back up. Your example, if I remember right from when I took the Java Certification test last year, is a varient o

Re: More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

1999-05-03 Thread Paul Ho
Read README.linux You need greenthread and nojit Paul At 02:02 PM +0300 05/03/99, Jani Mikkonen wrote: >Call me stupid! Last post i made was made in haste. I did check that all >java >binaries runs properly and console "hello world" executes normally, what >i didnt >check was AWT based programs

Re: package importing conventions

1999-05-03 Thread Michael Sinz
On Mon, 3 May 1999 04:54:48 -0700 (PDT), Troy Wu wrote: >That an import uses a wildcard can also be a strength. One of the >merits of Java lies in its maintainability. Without the ability to >import entire package, packages whose structures are being changed >(generated code is notorious for ha

package importing conventions

1999-05-03 Thread Troy Wu
On Mon, 3 May 1999, Michael Sinz wrote: >class layout of java. So yes, it's fine that you declared a >variable as: > >java.util.List foo; Actually, I feel that the real problem is that import lets you use a wildcard. That is, IMHO, the real design flaw in Java. If import requi

Re: ...

1999-05-03 Thread James Seigel
Not much of an oversite at all I would gather...just have to think about how you are coding a bit more..Careful is good when you are coding. Cheers J. At 07:31 AM 5/3/99 -0400, Michael Sinz wrote: >On Sun, 2 May 1999 20:04:19 -0400, Will Koffel wrote: > >>The java.awt.List and java.util.List con

Re: ...

1999-05-03 Thread Michael Sinz
On Sun, 2 May 1999 20:04:19 -0400, Will Koffel wrote: >The java.awt.List and java.util.List conflict you have found is >in my opinion a VERY unfortunate oversight on the part of Sun. >It's one example of some lack of coordination in designing the >class layout of java. So yes, it's fine that y

More problems with Java2 and Redhat6.0

1999-05-03 Thread Jani Mikkonen
Call me stupid! Last post i made was made in haste. I did check that all java binaries runs properly and console "hello world" executes normally, what i didnt check was AWT based programs. Now the problem is in 'em. AWT based programs seems to crash for no reason. First, ofcourse, java reported er

Re: SIGBUS in AllocSetAlloc & jdbc (fwd)

1999-05-03 Thread Peter T Mount
[ I'm cc'ing this to java-linux as this seems to be a problem with the Linux PPC port - peter ] On Sun, 2 May 1999, Tatsuo Ishii wrote: [snip] > This morning I started to look into this. First, JDBC driver coming > with 6.5b did not compile. The reason was my JDK (JDK 1.1.7 v1 on > LinuxPPC) r

help proposal

1999-05-03 Thread Stef Epardaud
hi, i don't know if this is a good address to send this mail, but i hope so. we're developing a lot on java under linux and we have 4 full-time very good programmers that use almost all of the capabilities of the core jdk1.2 (that is jdk1.1 + swing + corba + jdbc + rmi + DnD). we ran into load

Re: Redhat60 and Java2

1999-05-03 Thread Jani Mikkonen
Jani Mikkonen wrote: > > I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to > RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary > file ive tried. > > So, what might cause the problem and how to fix it. At the same moment, i pushed send button,i had an idea

Re: Redhat60 and Java2

1999-05-03 Thread Constantin Teodorescu
Jani Mikkonen wrote: > > I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to > RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary > file ive tried. We have tried here RH 6.0 and all versions of JDK. For the moment , only JDK 1.1.6 is working fine on RH 6.0 Be

Redhat60 and Java2

1999-05-03 Thread Jani Mikkonen
I resently switched from SOT linux which is based on Redhat 5.2 to RedHat60 and now Java2 reports similar message to this on every binary file ive tried. *** panic: GC: getStickySystemClass failed: java/lang/ref/Reference CLASSPATH may be incorrect SIGABRT 6* abort (generated by abo