JDK 1.2 on Redhat 6.0 ?

1999-05-04 Thread chetan
Hi all Any experiences with JDK 1.2 on Redhat 6.0 ? I have just upgraded from RH 5.1 to RH 6.0 and find myself without any java. Do I need to recompile/relink source (if it is available) ? Regards, Chetan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, emai

Dumb Question

1999-05-04 Thread Alex Pozgaj
Luther Baker writes: > I am using Red Hat and recently downloaded your jdk1.2. Unfortunately, I > am not as UNIX savvy as I need to be and the .bz2 extension is throwing > me. gunzip and gzip resond with errors that they don't understand the > file format. The .bz2 files can be handeled with

Dumb Question

1999-05-04 Thread Luther Baker
I am using Red Hat and recently downloaded your jdk1.2. Unfortunately, I am not as UNIX savvy as I need to be and the .bz2 extension is throwing me. gunzip and gzip resond with errors that they don't understand the file format. Is there a man page or an http address to download this expander... o

Re: glibc 2.1 binary

1999-05-04 Thread Steve Byrne
Scott Murray writes: > On Tue, 27 Apr 1999, Tom McMichael wrote: > > [snip!] > > > Good point Paul ... checked out jitter bug and according to the "DONE" > > section the two choices for glibc 2.1 are: > > 1) jdk 1.2 > > 2) pre-pre-release of jdk117_v2 available at ... > > > > http://

Re: ... java.io.*

1999-05-04 Thread Jeff Galyan
Use a StreamTokenizer to break the input stream into tokens, using whitespace as the quote character. Daniel Ignat wrote: > > > now .. how can I read from file > first line is: > > May 4 15:51:04 dexter pppd[304]: local IP address *.*.*.* > > - in my scenario I need to read first line and:

Re: Does JDK 1.2 work with RH 6.0

1999-05-04 Thread Christopher Seawood
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Al wrote: > I am going to upgrade to Red Hat 6.0 and I was wondering if JDK 1.2 > work with Red Hat 6.0? The current glibc 2.0 release of JDK 1.2 works if you use green threads and the option -Djava.compiler=NONE. > Does any JDK work with RH 6.0? There are glibc 2.1.x bu

Re: Does JDK 1.2 work with RH 6.0

1999-05-04 Thread zun
On Wed, 5 May 1999, Al wrote: > I am going to upgrade to Red Hat 6.0 and I was wondering if JDK 1.2 > work with Red Hat 6.0? The answer from previous mailings is "not yet". The next prerelease/release should fix the problem. > Does any JDK work with RH 6.0? A new release of JDK 1.1.7 is alr

Re: newb: running Java service?

1999-05-04 Thread zun
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Tom Roche wrote: > I'm working on a Java-based website, running on Apache on a Linux > box. It has a backend that connects users (applets) to the > database. For testing, I've been logging in and running a script that > runs my backend classes. Now I want the backend to run as

Does JDK 1.2 work with RH 6.0

1999-05-04 Thread Al
I am going to upgrade to Red Hat 6.0 and I was wondering if JDK 1.2 work with Red Hat 6.0? Does any JDK work with RH 6.0? Thanks Al -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Co

Re: newb: running Java service?

1999-05-04 Thread Ted Neward
Tom-- If your users are running as applets, why not run your server as a servlet? Does it need to hold state information across the entire userset, or is each user interaction stateless? What I'm suggesting is something like this: create a number of different servlets to perform each task ("AddF

Re: newb: running Java service?

1999-05-04 Thread Nathan Meyers
If your services are happening in connection with web interaction, which it sounds like they are, you probably need servlets. Check out Apache JServ (at the Apache site) -- you can launch your back-end classes right from Apache. Nathan Tom Roche wrote: > > First: I hope this, being more of a L

Re: newb: running Java service?

1999-05-04 Thread Dustin Lang
Hi, I'm not certain about any of this, but here are my guesses: > Is "service" the proper term to use here? ("daemon"?) Daemon would probably be more appropriate. > What is "the best way" to do this? If I'm not mistaken, many (most?) internet-type daemons, ftpd for example, will fork() a pro

newb: running Java service?

1999-05-04 Thread Tom Roche
First: I hope this, being more of a Linux question rather than a Java question, isn't off-topic: if so, please excuse. Second: feel free to correct any and all errors in conception or usage you see--I know all too little about Linux, Unix, and system administration. (But I hope to devote more tim

Re: Looking for compiler

1999-05-04 Thread Chris Abbey
there are two serious* compilers for java on linux that I know of... javac that comes with the jdk and jikes from alphaworks.ibm.com. VB isn't a compiler; it's an overglorified scripting langauge bundled with a propriatary IDE. I think what you wanted was a reference to an IDE for Linux... there a

timezone weirdness

1999-05-04 Thread Godmar Back
Hi, I'm using the glibc version of jdk1.1.7v1a on a RH 5.2 system with glibc 2.0.7. When trying to run some programs, I'm getting this message: java.lang.Error: dtz null at java.util.TimeZone.getDefault(TimeZone.java:94) at at at ObjectSerialization.main(ObjectS

Re: Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

1999-05-04 Thread Christopher Seawood
On Tue, 4 May 1999, Tom McMichael wrote: > Is there a reason why you haven't tried jdk117_v2 with glibc 2.1.1. > I'm using it on my RH 6.0 install and it works great (using with > swing and JDBC). Because I've been sitting on this tarball a week waiting for a response from sbb. Looking at the m

Re: Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

1999-05-04 Thread Tom McMichael
Sandro Hawke wrote: > > An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is > > available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If one > > could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be > > mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :) > > W

Re: Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

1999-05-04 Thread Sandro Hawke
> An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is > available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If one > could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be > mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :) Well, I can mirror it at least:

Car companies adopt Java for multimedia platform

1999-05-04 Thread Alexander V. Konstantinou
Mailed in todays "NewsScan Daily" (now all we have to hope for is that they make the right choice and choose Linux as the embedded OS :-) [ ... content removed ...] CAR COMPANIES ADOPT JAVA FOR MULTIMEDIA PLATFORM The Automotive Multimedia Interface Consortium (AMIC) has agreed to use Sun Micro

RE: Looking for compiler

1999-05-04 Thread Peter Schuller
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > I am new to Java and am looking for a user-friendly compiler for Java on > Linux. It would be nice if the compiler has the features of Visual Basic. > Does anyone know of such compiler? What you're looking for is not a compiler, but an IDE (I

Re: pre-jdk117_v2 works fine (was: Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?)

1999-05-04 Thread Michael Sinz
On Tue, 4 May 1999 18:44:51 +0200, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: >On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 01:19:43PM +, dog wrote: >> Michael.Sinz wrt: >> > The Blackdown porting group has been thinking about changing the way the >> > Linux Java Wrapper works so that it automatically detects if it should >>

... java.io.*

1999-05-04 Thread Daniel Ignat
hi import java.io.*; public class f_open { public static void main (String args[]) { File f = new File ("message.test",); if(f.exists()) System.out.println(f + " exist"); else System.out.println(f + " oppps ... not exist")

pre-jdk117_v2 works fine (was: Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?)

1999-05-04 Thread Louis-David Mitterrand
On Tue, May 04, 1999 at 01:19:43PM +, dog wrote: > Michael.Sinz wrt: > > The Blackdown porting group has been thinking about changing the way the > > Linux Java Wrapper works so that it automatically detects if it should > > try to run the "X11" version of Java or not. (Meaning the version th

Sorry! (was: Socket bug?)

1999-05-04 Thread Andreas Rueckert
Hi! On Tue, 04 May 1999 Michael Sinz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >This is not a bug in the JDK - you may wish to look at the getHostAddress() >method which will return a string of just the address. Michael is right. There was an additional getHostAddress() call, so the equals() had to fail

Looking for compiler

1999-05-04 Thread Ong Boon Wee
Hi I am new to Java and am looking for a user-friendly compiler for Java on Linux. It would be nice if the compiler has the features of Visual Basic. Does anyone know of such compiler? Ong Boon Wee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE,

Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-04 Thread Michael Sinz
The Blackdown porting group has been thinking about changing the way the Linux Java Wrapper works so that it automatically detects if it should try to run the "X11" version of Java or not. (Meaning the version that has the AWT peers in it) The concept is that if DISPLAY is not set it will automa

Re: HotSpot

1999-05-04 Thread Nathan Meyers
Steve Byrne wrote: > > Matt Lord writes: > > Do you plan on porting HotSpot if and when Sun releases the source code? > > If Sun will license us the code, we'll port it. For what it's worth, Java Lobby reported a few days ago that Sun is planning -- says Alan Baratz -- to release HotSpot sourc

Re: why do we need X11 to run purely command line java stuff?

1999-05-04 Thread dog
Michael.Sinz wrt: > The Blackdown porting group has been thinking about changing the way the > Linux Java Wrapper works so that it automatically detects if it should > try to run the "X11" version of Java or not. (Meaning the version that > has the AWT peers in it) > > The concept is that if DIS

Re: Socket bug?

1999-05-04 Thread Michael Sinz
On Tue, 4 May 1999 15:35:47 +0200, Andreas Rueckert wrote: >Hi! > >Platform: RedHat 5.1, Kernel 2.2.3, JDK 1.1.7a > >I connect with a FTP client to localhost and check for a data connection >spoofing attack then. I create a IP from a string "127.0.0.1", but it's not >equal to the sockets remote I

Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

1999-05-04 Thread Christopher Seawood
An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If someone could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :) Details. It was built on a Red Hat

Socket bug?

1999-05-04 Thread Andreas Rueckert
Hi! Platform: RedHat 5.1, Kernel 2.2.3, JDK 1.1.7a I connect with a FTP client to localhost and check for a data connection spoofing attack then. I create a IP from a string "127.0.0.1", but it's not equal to the sockets remote IP: Remote-IP: 127.0.0.1 Test-IP: localhost/127.0.0.1 remoteIp <>

Re: JDK 111.7v1a_native/incomplete libawt linkage?

1999-05-04 Thread bernd kreimeier
> Moses> LD_PRELOAD=libXt.so libXm.so libXext.so Juergen: > We clarified some motif issue: The next 1.2 release will have the necessary > parts of motif statically linked into libawt. With this change Invocation > and AWT should work. Well, any chance to get this working with 1.1.7v1a+native