JDK1.2 on Slackware3.5 problems.

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi all, I have Slackware3.5(2.0.34 Linux kernel,libc.so.5.4.44) loaded on 586(IBM) machine.I have loaded JDK1.2 (jdk1.2pre-v1.tar.bz2) on this Linux machine. When I execute any JAVA commands (java,javac etc) it is giving following error : for 'java' : --

Problem in running RMI server : JDK1.2v2 / RH6.0 / glibc2.1

1999-06-24 Thread Pratip Kar
Hi, I am running a simple RMI test application. But after doing the "Naming.rebind()" the server simply comes out. There is no exception or anything. But instead of waiting for the Client connection, it exits normally after binding to rmiregistry. My system has RH6.0 with glibc2.1. I am not

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> To: bryan vold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 25 Jun 1999 01:58:33 +0200 > > bryan> What is uncertain is whether or not Sun > bryan> will incorporate some of the constructions that are a part

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > I don't know for sure since, as I said, I haven't done a lot of > multi-threaded programming. I've run a few third-party Java apps, but > have no idea on the whole how thread-intensive any of them are. > > These two classes are a couple of stupid little things I wrote to se

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > OK... so one other question you haven't answered. Are you sure you've > got two threads staying busy? Most of Java's threads spend most of their > time sitting around and waiting. If you've really got two threads > spinning and you're not seeing 100% load, something's str

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> bryan vold writes: bryan> At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little bryan> about some of the delays. What I got as one of the main bryan> problems was a very difficult problem of Linux native bryan> threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said that

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > > Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > > > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK > > > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it > > > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads, > > > it only

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Nathan Meyers wrote: > > > I'm curious about this as well. I've been playing around with the JDK > > 1.2-pre2 on my spanking new Dual-PII machine recently to see how well it > > handles SMP and I've noticed that with either native or green threads, > > it only seems to use a single CPU for runni

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
"Hopple, Michael R (CRD)" wrote: > > Rachel - > > I also am running an SMP kernel with a RedHat 5.2 installation. I have found the >same observations > that you did regarding native and green threads. Unfortunately, green thread with >no JIT is really a > pain. Well, as it's all I had under

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Michael Sinz wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: > > >Cees de Groot wrote: > >> > >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > >> a dual PII box. Green

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
bryan vold wrote: > At the Java-Linux BOF at JavaOne, Steve talked a little about some of the > delays. What I got as one of the main problems was a very difficult > problem of Linux native threads and signal-handling in the JVM. Steve said > that they are not only just porting, but also trying

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Derek Glidden wrote: > > > Dan Iuster wrote: > > > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > > the uniprocessor version on m

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, Jun 24, 1999 at 12:47:17PM -0700, Nathan Meyers wrote: > > Dan Iuster wrote: > > > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues wit

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> Dan Iuster wrote: > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ? I'm curious

RE: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Rachel - I also am running an SMP kernel with a RedHat 5.2 installation. I have found the same observations that you did regarding native and green threads. Unfortunately, green thread with no JIT is really a pain. My observation about native threads and JIT on a multiprocessor system is th

Re: JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
> Dan Iuster wrote: > > I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM > compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor. > > Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using > the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ? > > Any fee

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
On Thu, 24 Jun 1999 19:52:20 +0100, Rachel Greenham wrote: >Cees de Groot wrote: >> >> Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 >> (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on >> a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native t

RE: ServletEngine for linux

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I use the free version of JRun. http://www.livesoftware.com Rob > -Original Message- > From: Jason Proctor [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 1:11 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ServletEngine for linux > > >I'm not a real linux-user, but i am a

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Cees de Groot wrote: > > Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 > (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on > a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native threads seem > to be less stable than the same on a single process

JVM on multiprocessor Linux systems

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
I would like to know if there is a different version of the JVM compiled for multiprocessor Linux systems than for uniprocessor.   Has anybody experienced any problems or performance issues with using the uniprocessor version on multiprocessor systems ?   Any feedback would be greatly appre

Re: JDK 1.2.2 Performance

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >Things will improve -- they've already started to improve -- but not as >fast as you'd like. The reality of the Linux revolution is that manning >the barricades gives you the responsibility to help make things better >and forfeits you the right to bitch and moan about the

Re: Java 1.2 pre2 and SMP?

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Just to add a data point: I've experienced the same. Also using SuSE 6.1 (SMP 2.2.10 kernel, I don't know which libc but I think not glibc2.1) on a dual PII box. Green threads don't work at all, native threads seem to be less stable than the same on a single processor box (which is a mobile Pentiu

Re: Re:Re: ServletEngine for linux : THX

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Thanks for your help. Mark -Original Message- From: Steve Nguyen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Wednesday, June 23, 1999 8:59 PM Subject: Re:Re: ServletEngine for linux >Try mySQL. It also has JDBC type-4 suppo

sunWJit

1999-06-24 Thread Anonymous
Hi, has anybody tried sunwjit with blackdown 1.1.7 ? I tried it and it seems that blackdown with this JIT is slower then without it. Has anybody any ideas whats going on ? Thanks Holger -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PRO

Unsubscribe

1999-06-24 Thread Seungkeol Choe
Unsubscribe this mailing list