Riyad Kalla wrote:
> If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
> And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
> JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
> Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
> between that solution and JDK 1.2prev
>> IMHO, the ideal situation would be for Sun to support Linux as one of its
>> primary platforms. I don't understand why Sun does not. It would help Unix
>and
>> hurt NT (After all, the enemy of my enemy etc.).
>
>Is Linux not as much of a thread to Solaris?
If done properly Linux can be levera
Riyad Kalla wrote:
>
> If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
> And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
> JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
> Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
> between that solution and JDK 1.2pr
I think we should lobby a couple of the major linux distributions
to include blackdown on their CDs. Most developers have a fast
net connection, but downloading and correctly installing java
is quite an effort if all you have is a modem connection.
I heard that Redhat says that they can't for l
If I am just am just doing basic Swing/Java apps on Linux.
And want a farily stable solution, would my best bet to be
JDK 1.1.8 (when it comes out in a bit from Blackdown) and
Swing 1.1.1 from Sun? Or is there THAT much difference
between that solution and JDK 1.2prev2?
I would prefer a faster so
"Spectron International, Inc." wrote:
>
> I need to create an Image object in a servlet. The problem is that the
> createImage() functions seems to need AWT and I can't create an AWT object
> in a servlet because it always tries to connect to the X Server. Is there
> something like a MemoryImage
I need to create an Image object in a servlet. The problem is that the
createImage() functions seems to need AWT and I can't create an AWT object
in a servlet because it always tries to connect to the X Server. Is there
something like a MemoryImage class that I can create to use as an offscreen
ca
I'm consistently getting things like:
SIGSEGV 11* segmentation violation
stackpointer=0xbfffd97c
Full thread dump Classic VM (Linux_JDK_1.2_pre-release-v2, native threads):
"Finalizer" (TID:0x40ce3320, sys_thread_t:0x80ccb88, state:CW, native ID:0xc04)
prio=8
at java.la
A Blackdown team member provided a solution for my post here on 31-July-1999
regarding "Error: can't find libjava.so".
The reply was via personal e-mail, so I'm forwarding the solution back to
this listserv, for all who have asked for a follow up:
>You tried something like 'cd jdk1.2/bin ; java
Greg Walker wrote:
>
> A mere curiosity ...
>
> I have a class that performs many calcs. The values are *slightly*
> (after about 14 significant figures) different depending on the jvm I
> use (either ibm's 1.1.6 or blackdown's 1.1.7). Is there a difference
> between algorithms to solve for trig
>Win32 is the desktop OS. M$ was threatening the success of Java with J++
and
>their Java-clone (COOL IIRC). Java without Win32 is a no-go. Linux is not
that
>important _yet_.
We are migrating from NT to Linux.
And evrything is going right. It's not a fast step. First We had to test the
OS itself
On 1999-08-18 11:52:16 -0500, Greg Walker wrote:
> I have a class that performs many calcs. The values are *slightly*
> (after about 14 significant figures) different depending on the jvm I
> use (either ibm's 1.1.6 or blackdown's 1.1.7). Is there a difference
> between algorithms to solve for tri
A mere curiosity ...
I have a class that performs many calcs. The values are *slightly*
(after about 14 significant figures) different depending on the jvm I
use (either ibm's 1.1.6 or blackdown's 1.1.7). Is there a difference
between algorithms to solve for trig functions or logarithms between
j
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999, Larry Gates wrote:
>
> >Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:48:11 +
> >From: Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> >> So, I think the Linux community needs a better, GUI driven FTP
> >> program in the style of CuteFTP. Java is well suited to develop this.
> >
> >ncftp> get -R
> >w
SHUDO Kazuyuki wrote:
> Michael Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > By splitting the JVM from the class libraries via a portable interface we gain
>a lot !
> > I think if development was split between multiple JVM's and a open robust class
>library
> > we could get competative support f
On 1999-08-18 10:50:26 -0300, Larry Gates wrote:
> >From: Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Personally, I can't stand GUI ftp tools. But if you want them, try a
> >search on freshmeat.org. I'm sure they'll have half a dozen.
>
> their website isn't up yet...
http://core.freshmeat.net/mirrors.php
>Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:48:11 +
>From: Steve Fink <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> So, I think the Linux community needs a better, GUI driven FTP
>> program in the style of CuteFTP. Java is well suited to develop this.
>
>ncftp> get -R
>will do it, if you want all the files in one directory.
yea
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Riyad> - What they need from US to help out
> Riyad> - What the future looks like.
>
> The JDK 1.1.8 is nearly finished (the remaining problem is the native
> threads vm).
> The next JDK 1.2 release will be 1.2.1 because AFAIK there still is no
> JCK t
Michael Emmel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> By splitting the JVM from the class libraries via a portable interface we gain a
>lot !
> I think if development was split between multiple JVM's and a open robust class
>library
> we could get competative support from comercial and Open Source v
On Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:00:20 Gunnar Stahl wrote:
>>
>
>maybe in the desktop area. And they knew that it was very usefull to create the
>thought and feeling of a "java community". But the big heads at solaris
>suddenly noticed that linux is becoming more and more stronger and that they
>have t
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> So we're left with a few questions. Should the existing devolopers of
> Java porting projects aid an IBM JDK? IBM having greater resources to
> throw at this, knowing that their work would go to speed up the
> production of a product owned by a corporation, that inte
On 1999-08-17 11:40:42 -0700, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> I don't see it being in Sun's interest at all to support Linux. They are shooting,
> obviously, for the biggest market. I always found it interesting that they had a full
> complete JDK for Win32 LONG before they had a final version available for
>
It is very fascinating to see what is right now going on in the java market.
Mainly during the last two or three years there was a big hype going on about
java and the "write once run anywhere" promise. Sun claimed it's java to be the
solving of the problems of modern computerlanguages. You wri
Hi!
I am looking for font.properties file supporting Latin-2 character set
or
some examples how to write font.properties file.
Thanx,
Damijan
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trou
24 matches
Mail list logo
