Hi,
> I downloaded the user version but since it runs on 1.1 I
> decided to upgrade the lot to 1.2 myself.
I've found that unless there's a good reason to use 1.2 (ie, one of Sun's
1001 APIs that is only in 1.2), there is no really good reason to
"upgrade" from 1.1 to 1.2. It may not be a bad
We're wandering OT here, but I hope this is useful to others dealing
with JNI/C++ integration...
Paul Beardsley wrote:
>
> That looks like the problem - I wasn't including the
> templated source at the end of the .h file.
>
> It raises
> a question for me though - for my template classes,
> I p
That looks like the problem - I wasn't including the
templated source at the end of the .h file.
It raises
a question for me though - for my template classes,
I previously had a MyFile.H file (with no included source
at the end) and a MyFile.C file which included MyFile.H
at the start and the
Paul Beardsley wrote:
>
> Nathan,
>
> Thanks for the reply.
>
> I just tried recompiling using -D_REENTRANT -fpic,
> but the same errors are occurring. When I run
> java, I get
You answered my point of curiosity about where the reference was coming
from... it's one of your templated classes r
Paul Beardsley wrote:
> I used "ldd -r libmylib.so" to look at my shared
> library and that also gave a list
> of undefined symbols, starting with the
> same symbol which Java lists as an unsatisfied link.
And what might that symbol (or some of those symbols) be? That info
would help diagnose the
On Sun, 12 Sep 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi Peter,
> Thanks for your reply. I have another question. I have postgresql,
> postgresql-clients, postgresql-data, postgresql-devel of release 6.3.2-10
> with my redhat linux 5.2. I uninstalled them and installed postgresql,
> postgresql-devel
I just started working on Redhat 6.0 using
jdk 1.2, and I would like to use a Java GUI
linked to a C++ .so library (compiled with g++),
communicating via the JNI.
I successfully linked the Java GUI to the C++ library
when no templates were used, but now I am linking to
C++ classes which are te
> Check your /etc/route.conf file. The multicast route must be set to
> something like this if you want to use multicast on eth0:
> 224.0.0.00.0.0.0240.0.0.0eth0
>
this was the problem. i used "route add -net 224.0.0.0 netmask 240.0.0.0
dev eth0" to add the route to the routing
i've had the same experience with AnyJ. nice product.
rob
> -Original Message-
> From: Riyad Kalla [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, September 11, 1999 7:48 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Quetion on IDEs
>
>
> I've used netbeans, jbuilder,
