Re: Sun Java 2 for Linux

1999-10-22 Thread Nelson Minar
>Well, according the article at InfoWorld, Sun are working with Blackdown >to do the port so I guess they'll continue to be closely involved with >Java on Linux. So in other words, this is business as usual? The press release made it sound like Sun was doing something new. Then again, they were r

Re: 1.2.2 Sun sources vs. pre-v2 diffs :(

1999-10-22 Thread Greg Wolodkin
Nathan Meyers writes: > On 22 Oct, Greg Wolodkin wrote: > > p.s. what's the motivation behind pushing the Motif dependencies > > into libawt.so in the 1.2 builds? This seems to make it > > impossible to have a Motif application which uses the JNI > > to do Java stuff (with AWT,

Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVMs (formatted for 70 columns)

1999-10-22 Thread Chris Abbey
>>To add another reason why nobody should draw conclusions quite yet: >>Kaffe's benchmarks were obtained with a version of its class libraries >>that was compiled with jikes, which is often considered to create >>the slowest bytecode among the different javac compilers. > >Is it? Can you point me

Re: 1.2.2 Sun sources vs. pre-v2 diffs :(

1999-10-22 Thread Moses DeJong
I think this is so that people who use AWT components in a JNI started Java program do not need to have Motif installed on the box. With Motif statically linked into libawt.so, this is not a problem (it was a problem with 1.1.7). I hope that helps Mo DeJong > p.s. what's the motivation behind pu

Re: 1.2.2 Sun sources vs. pre-v2 diffs :(

1999-10-22 Thread Nathan Meyers
On 22 Oct, Greg Wolodkin wrote: > p.s. what's the motivation behind pushing the Motif dependencies > into libawt.so in the 1.2 builds? This seems to make it > impossible to have a Motif application which uses the JNI > to do Java stuff (with AWT, anyway). Probably I'm missing >

1.2.2 Sun sources vs. pre-v2 diffs :(

1999-10-22 Thread Greg Wolodkin
Hi all - After registering with Sun, all I find there are the 1.2.2 JDK sources, and a patch from 1.2 -> 1.2.2 that I cannot reverse cleanly. The diffs available from Blackdown don't apply cleanly (obviously) to the 1.2.2 Sun tree after doing the patch-o-matic renaming etc. Can anyone provide a

Re: Release

1999-10-22 Thread Riyad Kalla
I agree. I am really interested to know what's going on with the Native Threads problem being tackled... George Sexton wrote: > I have to add my voice to the request for an update. It's been 1 month since > the last update on www.blackdown.org. > > I think this was said in the list before, but

RE: dbx

1999-10-22 Thread Burkhart,Kelly
Does gdb work rather than dbx? I have never seen dbx on Linux. Where did you find it? > -Original Message- > From: Raj Patel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Friday, October 22, 1999 1:15 PM > To: java-linux Mailing List > Subject: dbx > > > Hi everybody, >

Problems with java3d and MesaGL

1999-10-22 Thread tpeter
I'm having problems running java3d on redhat linux 6.0. I've downloaded and installed the jdk1.2.2 from blackdown and the demo applets seem to be running as they were intended. I've also downloaded and installed the java3d1_1_1pre-v1-linux-sdk and installed it as directed, and the Mesa-3.1beta

dbx

1999-10-22 Thread Raj Patel
Hi everybody, I am trying to debugg my native methods that are attached by JNI. I am trying to use dbx on my linux box but when i set my environment variable to dbx(setenv DEBUG_PROG dbx) and tried to run java it complained that exec: dbx: not found Does anybody have

Re: Benchmark results for Linux JVMs (formatted for 70 columns)

1999-10-22 Thread Todd Papaioannou
>To add another reason why nobody should draw conclusions quite yet: >Kaffe's benchmarks were obtained with a version of its class libraries >that was compiled with jikes, which is often considered to create >the slowest bytecode among the different javac compilers. Is it? Can you point me towa

Re: BlackDown Files for Redhat Linux 6.1

1999-10-22 Thread Gordon Chamberlin
Just download jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz from ftp://metalab.unc.edu/pub/linux/devel/lang/java/blackdown.org/JDK-1.1.7/i386/glibc/v3/ then "cd /usr/local/" "tar xzf jdk_1.1.7-v3-glibc-x86.tar.gz" and put /usr/local/jdk117_v3/bin in your PATH. -Gordon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Hi, >

Re: IBM's JDK 1.1.8 on Slack 4.0

1999-10-22 Thread Peter Pilgrim
Would it worked with SuSE 6.1 which is the version I have [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > David Shepherd wrote: > > > > Anyone know if IBM's new JDK1.1.8 will run on "out-of-the-box" Slackware 4.0? > > > > TIA > > Dave > > > > I have tried Suse 6.2 and it worked out of the box, although docs stat

RE: Release

1999-10-22 Thread George Sexton
I have to add my voice to the request for an update. It's been 1 month since the last update on www.blackdown.org. I think this was said in the list before, but I will say it again. It would be nice to have an updated status page on a weekly basis even if the status is "problems remain". George

Re: Urgently Looking for RMIRegistry Implementation

1999-10-22 Thread Matt Welsh
You could borrow the implementation from NinjaRMI, a free "RMI like" package from: http://www.cs.berkeley.edu/~mdw/proj/ninja I think it should be easy to adapt the NinjaRMI Registry implementation to work with Sun RMI. Cheers, Matt Welsh -

BlackDown Files for Redhat Linux 6.1

1999-10-22 Thread Lee_Xing
Hi, Could you please tell me what files we should download from Blackdown for Redhat Linux 6.1? Thanks. L. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]

SIGSEGV in jdb_g

1999-10-22 Thread Oleg Bogucharov - sw.com.sg
Hi, I am trying to run jdb_g without any parameters. And first that I see after launch is SIGSEGV. I use JDK 1.2 pre-release 2 on Red Hat 6.0 kernel 2.2.5-15. jdb do not shows SIGSEGV but hangs later in debugging. Do anybody have such errors experience? Any help would be greatly appreciated

Re: Urgently Looking for RMIRegistry Implementation

1999-10-22 Thread Peter Pilgrim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > rather than reimpl java.rmi.registry.Registry (hint ;) just test if the > port is still bound. A quick shell script in a cron job to run netstat -an > and cut down to the local port number, looking for listen. Or a java pgm > that open's a socket to 1099. Or a java pg

Re: Urgently Looking for RMIRegistry Implementation

1999-10-22 Thread Chris Abbey
rather than reimpl java.rmi.registry.Registry (hint ;) just test if the port is still bound. A quick shell script in a cron job to run netstat -an and cut down to the local port number, looking for listen. Or a java pgm that open's a socket to 1099. Or a java pgm that just does a lookup. Any would

Debugging-C++ code attached by JNI

1999-10-22 Thread Raj Patel
Hi, I am running into the situation where i need to debugg my c++ code that is attached by jni. Does anybody can help how can i debugg my c++ code?? Main application is in java-swing. -raj -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [E

Painting dynamically

1999-10-22 Thread ALPESH KOTHARI
Hello Everybody, I have a small problem with paint method. Consider a following situation. class comp extends JComponent { Graphics g; public comp() { //some code } public void paint(Graphics g) { g.drawRect(10,10,200,200);

Urgently Looking for RMIRegistry Implementation

1999-10-22 Thread Peter Pilgrim
Hi knowledgable Java-linux users. I am looking for an implementation source of code of rmiregistry. I really want to add a thread that touches a PID file every 5 seconds so that I know the rmiregistry is ALIVE. I don't need a custom registry if you know what I mean. Just a constant tick tick tic