Re: Kernel 2.2.13 breaks JNI on ix86, /proc/01234 weirdness

This came up a few weeks ago; one of the Blackdown team members indicated it'll be fixed in the next release. No indication of a target date, though. For that matter, no indication of whether this meant JDK release or kernel release :-O. Nathan On 30 Oct, Greg Wolodkin wrote: > Hi all - > After

Kernel 2.2.13 breaks JNI on ix86, /proc/01234 weirdness

Hi all - After upgrading my Linux kernel from 2.2.12 to 2.2.13, Java JNI examples fail to load the virtual machine *if* the process number is below 1. I'm not sure whether or not this is a bug in the 2.2.13 kernel, or a bug in the Blackdown JDK (1.1.7 v1a,v3), but the error I see when startin

pre-releases before final?

Hi, great to hear you're closing in on the target. one question though, just to get a feeling for what's really happening. is the release you're planning for the second half of november supposed to be the first final, JCK compliant release of jdk1.2.2 or is it planned as a pre-release (not all JC

Re: FYI: we're an adminless list?

That's just a typo in the list maintainer address. Used to point back to me. Will fix it shortly. Cheers, Karl Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > every recent mail from the list says: > > >To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [

Re: java 1.1.7/Linux Thread switching

Chris Abbey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This is "known behaviour". The thread spec is very vague in regard to how > it is supposed to work. There have been numerous discusions on the list [...] > but actually a statement of the technology's threading quality (or lack > thereof as the case may