Re: font.properties

1999-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Papirakis
MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > I'm thinking of cobbling together an automatic > configuration script that > will replace the fonts in font.properties with the > most similar fonts > listed in the output of xlsfonts. Do you think this > is worth doing, if > anyone

Re: font.properties

1999-12-02 Thread Jeff Bean
Hi John, folks, I finally solved the Java-fonts-not-found-via-remote-XServer problem using a combination of xlsfonts and sed to get a tailor-made font.properties for my Xserver setup. I figure the jdk will change again and the font.properties will change again as well, so this will either pretty

Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 02:09:30PM -0500, Joseph Shraibman wrote: > Paolo Ciccone wrote: > > > The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it > wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I could not compile my > program (that used the quicktime js

Re: RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > No, the GamekeeperRemoteServer is a runnable class (ie it contains the main > method). It just sits there doing nothing in particular. Ie it creates an > instance of itself, and waits until the client connects. It only dies like > this after about 10 minutes of no use. A

Re: RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread jbaker
> > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:249) > > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteCall.java:224) > > System Error:at sun.rmi.server.UnicastRef.invoke(UnicastRef.java:126) > > System Erro

jdk-1.2.2-RC2-linux-i386-glibc-2.1.2.sh

1999-12-02 Thread Emmanuel Papirakis
Hello, I am not sure if this is the right mailing list to ask this question. But, I've downloaded this file 3 times si far (and the server apperes to be very buisy). For some reason, it won't execute. This is the output message: bash: ./jdk-1.2.2-RC2-linux-i386-glibc-2.1.2.sh:

Re: Upgrading glibc to 2.1.2 (help!)

1999-12-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
"John N. Alegre" wrote: > > Hmmm Im on a RedHat 6.0 system and I just did a > > rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.at.somesite.somewhere/the/path/to/glibc-2.1.2-11.i386.rpm > > and it worked fine the first time. No conflicts, No Deps. > > Now I do recall a lot of problems when I tried to do that back in 5.0

Re: RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread Nathan Meyers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Has anyone ever come across this exception: > > System Error:java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:249) > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.St

Re: Upgrading glibc to 2.1.2 (help!)

1999-12-02 Thread John N. Alegre
Hmmm Im on a RedHat 6.0 system and I just did a rpm -Uvh ftp://ftp.at.somesite.somewhere/the/path/to/glibc-2.1.2-11.i386.rpm and it worked fine the first time. No conflicts, No Deps. Now I do recall a lot of problems when I tried to do that back in 5.0 with glibc-2.0.something but this one wo

Re: RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread jbaker
Erm, yes I read those docs too. The thing is, my RMI objects arent being killed off, and Im not doing anything fancy. It's so simple it might as well be the HelloWorld example;) The Object on the server side just sits there dishing out a "yes" or "no" to attempted logins. On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at

Re: R:Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 10:11:06AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote: > > When we switched to 10% Java code we actually reduced the memory footprint. Of course this was "...100% java code..." :) -- Paolo -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to

Re: RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread Joseph Shraibman
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Has anyone ever come across this exception: > > System Error:java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:249) > System Error:at >sun.rmi.transport.Strea

Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Joseph Shraibman
Paolo Ciccone wrote: The main problem I had with Jbuiler (enterprise 3 demo for windows) was that it wouldn't let me specify a classpath to use in compiling so I could not compile my program (that used the quicktime jsdk from apple). Also the auto-indent didn't seem to work. -

Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Thu, Dec 02, 1999 at 08:56:07AM -0600, Greg Tomalesky wrote: > Hi Paolo: > > That Solaris edition must be way newer than the demo CD I have: Yes it is, we actually officially announced it few days ago. PrimeTime, the code name for the Solaris edition, is a new codebase for JBuilder. The f

Re: R:Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Paolo Ciccone
> 1) It's a seriously heavy program; it needs around 128 - 256 MB ram for the > IDE to run smoothly. > 2) It's still quite unstable (version 2 was hopeless), unless you keep > strictly to the non-Visual parts of the IDE. When we switched to 10% Java code we actually reduced the memory footprin

RMi deaths

1999-12-02 Thread jbaker
Has anyone ever come across this exception: System Error:java.rmi.NoSuchObjectException: no such object in table System Error:at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.exceptionReceivedFromServer(StreamRemoteCall.java:249) System Error:at sun.rmi.transport.StreamRemoteCall.executeCall(StreamRemoteC

Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Greg Tomalesky
Hi Paolo: That Solaris edition must be way newer than the demo CD I have: jBuilder Enterprise Version 3.00 Build 003.000.273.000.English 09d/05m/1999 03:00:12 I was able to set the tab labels via the "constraint" parameter of an embedded jPanel. I still can't see wh

Re: IDE's

1999-12-02 Thread Oliver Fels
> The company I work for has asked me to evaluate IDE's for Java, > and I would like to include those that run under Linux. For the [snip] > The no-brainers that made the list right away are Visual Age, > JBuilder, and NetBeans, because they all run (or will soon) on > Linux. Can anybody give op