Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Nathan Meyers
Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > > Nathan Meyers writes: > > Nathan> Paolo Ciccone wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > >> > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the > >> > font.properties file. I'll

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Jeff Galyan
Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the > font.properties file. I'll do the same for the next Blackdown release > as people think that it is a bug, but it isn't. > Exactly, it just means that a font package isn't installed on the host sys

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Alan Westhagen
Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > > Nathan Meyers writes: > > Nathan> Paolo Ciccone wrote: > >> > >> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > >> > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the > >> > font.properties file. I'll

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Wed, Dec 22, 1999 at 01:57:01AM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > Paolo> Does anybody know if installing the URW fonts fixes the > Paolo> problem ? > > Yes, but you have to restore the original '.1' entries in > font.properties too. I believe this is the best solution. Any reason for

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> Nathan Meyers writes: Nathan> Paolo Ciccone wrote: >> >> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: >> > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the >> > font.properties file. I'll do the same for the next Blackdown releas

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Nathan Meyers
Paolo Ciccone wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the > > font.properties file. I'll do the same for the next Blackdown release > > as people think that it is a bug, but it isn't. > > > >

jni + rmi = NoClassDefFoundError + consternation

1999-12-21 Thread Jean-Pierre Fournier
I eventually found a "solution" to this problem. I never could get it to work under linux jdk1.1.7, however, when I upgraded java to 1.1.8 ( and to glibc2.1.2 ) the NoClassDefFoundError problem went away. Thanks to all who had suggestions. regards jp Jean-Pierre Fournier wrote: > > Hi, > >

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> Paolo Ciccone writes: Paolo> On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: >> No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in >> the font.properties file. I'll do the same for the next >> Blackdown release as people think that it is a bug

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 11:22:03PM +0100, Juergen Kreileder wrote: > No big surprise, they've commented out the relevant entries in the > font.properties file. I'll do the same for the next Blackdown release > as people think that it is a bug, but it isn't. > > Try to display dingbats characters

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Juergen Kreileder
> Alan Westhagen writes: Alan> I spent about a day trying to solve font problems with Alan> Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3. I improved the overall font Alan> situation with my RH6.0 system, but could not get rid of the Alan> many warning messages about zapf fonts. This problem

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Thomas Bonk
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 08:51:03AM -0800, Paolo Ciccone wrote: > The Sun/Inprise JKD has been tested with glibc 2.1.1. Does anybody know whether it is possible to install the glibc 2.1.2 as a secondary libc (having glibc 2.0.7 as primary libc)? I´d like to do this in order to use JBuilder togethe

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Alan Westhagen
John Hartman wrote: > > I wasn't able to run the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 (or at least the JRE) with > glibc 2.1.1, but installing glibc 2.1.2 did the trick. Still having > annoying font problems, though... > > John > > André Dahlqvist wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > I noted in Blackdowns README file that

Re: problems with JNI

1999-12-21 Thread Anthony G. Starovojtov
Pierre HÊroux wrote: > I use RedHat 6.1 and JDK1.2.2 RC1 > I have 2 kind of problemes with the JNI. > > First I get an exception with the following code. > Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Hello > at Native.main(Native.java:14) I had the same error on my RedHat

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Tue, Dec 21, 1999 at 12:31:17AM +0100, André Dahlqvist wrote: > I noted in Blackdowns README file that glibc 2.1.2 is required, and read > in Sun's README file that glic 2.1 is required for their version. Does > anyone know if they mean that any 2.1.x version works? The Sun/Inprise JKD has bee

Re: can't be instantiated.

1999-12-21 Thread Matthias Pfisterer
Hi, if you mean something like "system event queue can't be instantiated", it's due to security restrictions, but doesn't hurt most Swing applications. Matthias > Siriphen Wikaisuksakul wrote: > > Hello, > > When I run swing/applet program on browser, it show "can't be > instantiated". > But

Re: SRC for COLIN PLUMBS package

1999-12-21 Thread Matthias Pfisterer
Hi, well, Java isn't open source (see the recent story around blackdown). But the Sun Community Source License (SCSL) at least allows you to look at the code, including the native one. You can download it from Sun's web pages (25 MB); follow the links on Community Program or something like that. B

problems with JNI

1999-12-21 Thread Pierre Héroux
I use RedHat 6.1 and JDK1.2.2 RC1 I have 2 kind of problemes with the JNI. First I get an exception with the following code. Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: Hello at Native.main(Native.java:14) // Here is Native.java public class Native { static { Syste

Re: glibc requirements

1999-12-21 Thread John Hartman
I wasn't able to run the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 (or at least the JRE) with glibc 2.1.1, but installing glibc 2.1.2 did the trick. Still having annoying font problems, though... John André Dahlqvist wrote: > > Hi > > I noted in Blackdowns README file that glibc 2.1.2 is required, and read > in S

Re: segmentation violation when invoking JVM

1999-12-21 Thread Jean-Pierre Fournier
> > jclass cls = env->FindClass("Main"); > jmethodID mid = env->GetStaticMethodID(cls, "main", "()V"); > I'm no expert, but your problem appears to be right above. You are trying to locate a main method that takes no args, but your main method in your java program takes an arr

SRC for COLIN PLUMBS package

1999-12-21 Thread Suresh
[jdk1.2 pre v2 LINUX] Hi, We are into indepth analysis of cryptix.org and java.security. following the code we landed at BigInteger.java where there is a reference to the native code [ plumbGeneratePrime ] which was found in ./jre/lib/i386/libmath.so. This is Colin Plumbs big +ve integer package

can't be instantiated.

1999-12-21 Thread Siriphen Wikaisuksakul
Hello,   When I run swing/applet program on browser, it show "can't be instantiated". But when I run on appletviewer, it works fine. Why is the cause? How can I run this app on browser as well?   Regards, Penn.

segmentation violation when invoking JVM

1999-12-21 Thread benito . meeuwis
Hi, I'm using the code below to invoke the JVM. The code compiles and links Ok. When I try to run the code, the CallStaticVoidMethod(cls,mid) returns an error (segmentation violation). I'm using JDK1.1.7 version 3 and Linux 6.1 (SUSE). Does anybody know what causes this error ??? Thanks !! E-Ma

Re: Blackdown JDK vs Sun/Inprise

1999-12-21 Thread Paolo Ciccone
On Mon, Dec 20, 1999 at 05:55:52PM -0800, noisebrain wrote: > > Aren't we forgetting something in this discussion? > > Average PC has 64M, you want to write an application that runs > on this PC, your dev environment (JBuilder or whatever) > has, in addition to the application, a compiler, the I