> John Rousseau writes:
John> On Tuesday Mar 28, 2000, Norman Shapiro wrote:
>> The Java jni specifications require a JNIEnv* for almost all
>> functions they provide. Furthermore it seems that if multiple
>> Java threads can access the same function, each function call must
Hi-
I just downloaded and installed jdk1.2.2 on RH6.1. When trying to run
some sample code, I get the following message:
Exception in thread "main" java.lang.NoClassDefFoundError:
p1/Protection
Here is what I have:
jdk1.2.2 is installed in /usr/local. My path variable has
/usr/local/jdk1.2
IMHO, you have two options: either pass JNIEnv* to each level, or pass your
C++ objects back to the top level, and use JNIEnv* on them there. The
second option would avoid you having to make all your classes "JNI-aware".
To avoid that with the first option, hide JNIEnv* in a struct or a class or
a
On Tuesday Mar 28, 2000, Norman Shapiro wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Rousseau) writes:
> >You could save the pointer in thread local storage, but I guarantee
> >that it won't be portable.
> >
> >Take a look at pthread_key_create, pthread_setspecific, et al.
> >
>
> Thanks much, that's exac
On Tuesday Mar 28, 2000, Norman Shapiro wrote:
> The Java jni specifications require a JNIEnv* for almost all
> functions they provide. Furthermore it seems that if multiple
> Java threads can access the same function, each function call must
> use the JNIEnv* from the current thread.
>
> Give
The Java jni specifications require a JNIEnv* for almost all functions they
provide. Furthermore it seems that if multiple Java threads can access the same
function, each function call must use the JNIEnv* from the current thread.
Given that function I am writing is maybe 20 deep in a call hiera
Thank you Cyntia,
I have read this docs and found that it is easier to convert
leading zeroes to spaces by myself.
Regards,
Jacob Nikom
Cynthia Jeness wrote:
>
> Jacob,
>
> I also think that this should be part of standard Java; however, here is
> a paragraph from the Javadoc supplied with J
Adam Ambrose wrote:
>
> Rachel Greenham wrote:
>
> > Yes. That's the one I downloaded from netscape.com anyway, to my
> > recollection, that didn't work with the libc5 Acrobat plugin either, but
> > does with the newer presumably glibc one that's come out more recently.
> >
> > Is there an easy
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> >> Do you use a glibc-2.x version of netscape?
>
> Rachel> Is there an easy way I can verify this? (I know there's a
> Rachel> command to run on an executable to see what library
> Rachel> dependencies it has, but I can't remember what it is.)
>
> ldd
