On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Man Chi Ly wrote:
> one issue I'm having with jikes is that (I quote from the FAQ):
Well, the java-linux list is not really the right place to
talk about issues you have with jikes. I think it is ok
to post something like "Jikes is neat, you should try it"
since it is a java
I am not able to run Java Console from Netscape 4.7 on Linux Mandrake 7.2,
after installing Sun JDK 1.3.
Sun gives the following instructions to install JRE plugin, included in JDK
1.3, for Netscape :
--
one issue I'm having with jikes is that (I quote from the FAQ):
Jikes allows the use of JAR files, which have the standard "zip" format,
provided that any contained class files are stored either using no
compression or the default "DeflatedN" compression (also known as "method
8" in zip-speak).
-Original Message-
From: Joi Ellis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Wednesday, December 20, 2000 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT
>On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> I second that request..
> I guess I didn't explain the problem very well (and glancing at the
> gcj web site didn't show me the answer). For one thing, I'm assuming
> that gcj will do inlining.
I think right now it doesn't do much of that. Though I've known folk
who look at providing member access without a function c
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I second that request...
>
> Andreas Micklei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/19/2000 07:35:10 AM
>
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> cc:
> Subject: Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT
>
>
> To the List Administrators:
>
> I guess that only people that are subscribed to
> = From: Cliff Draper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> = Sent: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 10:35 AM
> > = From: David Brownell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > = Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2000 19:52:46 -0800
> > My own experience with GCJ is positive. For many things it's
> > faster than Hotspot, and the startup time
Shivakant is developing a STRIKING RESEMBLANCE to Zippy the Pinhead!
Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT wrote:
> HI JESUS !Have'nt seen you around for quite sometime.Are you talking about
> giving SWING THE BOOT.Let me tell you this i will kill for SWING.
>
> YOURS SINCERELY
> SHIVAKANTH
>
-
I second that request...
Peacee
Tom
Andreas Micklei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/19/2000 07:35:10 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT
To the List Administrators:
I guess that only people that are subscribed to this list can post here
(which
is good spam preventi
On Tue, 19 Dec 2000, Lachlan O'Dea wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2000 at 06:07:39PM -0600, Joi Ellis wrote:
> > On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I started to use jikes and like it very much. So I started to wonder,
> > > what are the disadvantages to use jikes instea
Nathan Meyers wrote:
> "Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote:
>
>
>> I believe the above is NOT possible, because of the requirement for X,
>> but just to be sure...
>>
>> I don't have a problem running a Java Swing-less and AWT-less program at
>> boot time, ... but is there a way to have a Java Swing
To the List Administrators:
I guess that only people that are subscribed to this list can post here (which
is good spam prevention practise anyway). If so can we please have
Mr.Y.SHIVAKANT have removed from the list? Thanks in advance.
Btw.: Adding an X-Abuse header or something like that would
Juergen Kreileder wrote:
> > "Nathan" == Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Nathan> I used to believe that until I tried, some months back, a
> Nathan> side-by-side comparison of some benchmark code compiled by
> Nathan> the old Blackdown JDK1.2.2 javac and a Sun-suppli
"Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote:
> I believe the above is NOT possible, because of the requirement for X,
> but just to be sure...
>
> I don't have a problem running a Java Swing-less and AWT-less program at
> boot time, ... but is there a way to have a Java Swing program,
> therefore requiring X, to
-Original Message-
From: Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 6:47 PM
Subject: Re: JDK1.3 only classic works
>Given that Sun and Blackdown's code branched off at some point in the
>past, how do we know if a Sun
-Original Message-
From: Levente Farkas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Mo DeJong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Java-Linux
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 4:42 PM
Subject: Re: What are the disadvantages of u
-Original Message-
From: Robert B. Easter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 1:09 PM
Subject: fonts for java programs
>I'm getting this everytime I start just about any java program:
>
>reaster@comptechnews:/usr/local/jdk/bin$
-Original Message-
From: Juergen Kreileder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Robert B. Easter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 11:55 AM
Subject: Re: sdk 1.3.0 fcs netscape plugin problem
>> "Robert" == Robert B Easter <[EMAIL PROTE
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Shraibman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Graham Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 7:25 AM
Subject: Re: JDK1.3 only classic works
>It apperears Sun has finally fixed the HotSpot crash problem. S
-Original Message-
From: Jesus M. Salvo Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Java-Linux <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Tuesday, December 19, 2000 7:16 PM
Subject: Running a Java Swing program at boot
>
>I believe the above is NOT possible, because of the requirement for X,
>but just to be sure...
>
>
I think this is just passing the buck. Javac should do its 'optimizations' (
whatever they may be ) irrespective of the fact that a JIT might be there (
or any other accellerator/translator ). Nor is there any guarantee that a
JIT will optimize anything in its translations.
Mo DeJong wrote:
> "Nathan" == Nathan Meyers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Nathan> Mo DeJong wrote:
>> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>>
>> > In at least a few instances that I know of, jikes produces
>> > slower code. But I don't think javac is a really great
>> > optimi
And whatever the answer is, is it generally true for all Unix-like
operating systems?
"Jesus M. Salvo Jr." wrote:
>
> I believe the above is NOT possible, because of the requirement for X,
> but just to be sure...
>
> I don't have a problem running a Java Swing-less and AWT-less program at
> b
I believe the above is NOT possible, because of the requirement for X,
but just to be sure...
I don't have a problem running a Java Swing-less and AWT-less program at
boot time, ... but is there a way to have a Java Swing program,
therefore requiring X, to startup at boot time? ... and when the
Given that Sun and Blackdown's code branched off at some point in the
past, how do we know if a Sun-Linux JVM bug is also a Blackdown bug? ...
or vice-versa?
Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> It apperears Sun has finally fixed the HotSpot crash problem. See
> http://developer.java.sun.com/developer/
Mo DeJong wrote:
>
> On Mon, 18 Dec 2000, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> > In at least a few instances that I know of, jikes produces slower code.
> > But I don't think javac is a really great optimizing compiler either.
>
> That does not matter. Java code should be optimized by
> the JIT not the
Have you done any tests on SMP using SE v1.3.0-FCS based on Sun's 1.3.0_01
code?
//OLAS
Nathan Meyers wrote:
>
> I used to believe that until I tried, some months back, a side-by-side
> comparison of some benchmark code compiled by the old Blackdown JDK1.2.2
> javac and a Sun-supplied javac on
27 matches
Mail list logo
