On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> Scott Murray wrote:
> >
> > Nowadays the buffers are purely used for buffering access to the block
> > devices (e.g. disks). Pretty much everything else is now cached in the
> > page cache.
>
> That still doesn't answer my question. If everything i
On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Vladimir G Ivanovic wrote:
> The short answer is no. There is no concept of memory and no concept of
> a VM in Java. So you can't go rummaging around memory looking for
> things, and (basically) you can't ask the VM to do anything except
> execute bytecodes.
>
> The longer a
Scott Murray wrote:
>
> On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
>
> > On a related note, what is the difference between "buffered" and
> > "cached" memory? I've noticed that with 2.4.0 there is barely any
> > buffered.
>
> Nowadays the buffers are purely used for buffering access to the b
"p" == pickard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
p> Is there a way to ask the VM if there is an instance of an Object
p> already in the VM and get a copy of that instance?
The short answer is no. There is no concept of memory and no concept of
a VM in Java. So you can't go rummaging around memory
On Wed, 10 Jan 2001, Joseph Shraibman wrote:
> On a related note, what is the difference between "buffered" and
> "cached" memory? I've noticed that with 2.4.0 there is barely any
> buffered.
Nowadays the buffers are purely used for buffering access to the block
devices (e.g. disks). Pretty mu
Hi,
Is there a way to ask the VM if there is an instance
of an Object already in the VM and get a copy of that
instance?
Thanks.
-p.
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Troub
On the contrary - I've been finding things a little quicker.
All the things I've thrown at it build and run without a problem and it definitely
seems more efficient in the VM area, I seem to have more spare ram (ie. the free
memory after subtracting buffers/cache) but I'm not sure if its just a
