I hope be expert to use Java like all of you. Can you give me
to me a clue how to install the java in my linux box? I want to make it be
a java server. Please what of java resource should i prepare?
Thank you.
BEGIN:VCARD
VERSION:2.1
N:;[EMAIL PROTECTED]
FN:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
EMAIL;PREF;INT
Sorry, bad subject on prev post.
- Original Message -
From: "asit" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Blackdown" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2002 1:31 PM
Subject: Re: Why do threads take so long to wake up underlinux
> Hello all,
>
> I need to build the Jdk 1.1.8 on a x86 lin
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 01:18:17PM -0800, Veda Narayanan wrote:
> All,
> I agree with jim. We need to share information about this as this have
> direct impact on java/linux combination as a Enterprise platform. This
> should be addressed in a broad spectrum than just changing a parameter in
Hello all,
I need to build the Jdk 1.1.8 on a x86 linux box. Where can i get the diff's
?. I am looking for them at blackdown, and i am unable to locate them. Any
pointers will be appreciated.
Thanks in advance for your help.
Regards
- asit
All,
I agree with jim. We need to
share information about this as this have direct impact on java/linux
combination as a Enterprise platform. This should be addressed in a broad
spectrum than just changing a parameter in kernel, though I'm interested in the
kernel tweak.
Lets pos
Why not have this discussion on this list? It seems to directly impact Java. The relationship between the Linux scheduler and Java is pretty important. IBM has produced some scheduler kernel mods to improve JVM performance. These are a bit more complicated than just cranking some params, bu
On Tue, Feb 19, 2002 at 09:56:14AM -0800, Jim Hazen wrote:
> That's a good point. However on my Dual 450 there seems to be no
> performance loss with these new settings. In fact things seem a bit
> more responsive. I'm not sure exactly why, but my guess would be
> extensive use of 'wait and not
That's a good point. However on my Dual 450 there seems to be no performance loss with these new settings. In fact things seem a bit more responsive. I'm not sure exactly why, but my guess would be extensive use of 'wait and notify' in various programs. Before there was a 10ms penalty if on
The downside for sure it that you now interrupt the cpu 1000 times per
second. The overhead in processing the interrupt. ( context save,
registers saved ). The services performed at a clock ( jiffy ) tick (
timeout services, scheduling services ), are now done more frequently.
but with 1 gighz mac
How
does this affect the rest of the performance of the machine, are there any
downsides?
-Original Message-From: Jim Hazen
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: February 18, 2002 8:46
PMTo: BlackdownSubject: Re: Why do threads take so long
to wake up underlinuxOk, I've rebuild t
10 matches
Mail list logo
