Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Ioan - Ciprian Tandau
On 5/3/06, Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, 3 May 2006 07:32:10 -0400 "Ioan - Ciprian Tandau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I told him about getFD().sync() (for FileInput/OutputStream and > RandomFile It seems to be the only way to make sure things are > synchronously writ

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Wed, 3 May 2006 07:32:10 -0400 "Ioan - Ciprian Tandau" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I told him about getFD().sync() (for FileInput/OutputStream and > RandomFile It seems to be the only way to make sure things are > synchronously written to disk (local storage). The fact that the file is ph

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Ioan - Ciprian Tandau
I told him about getFD().sync() (for FileInput/OutputStream and RandomFile It seems to be the only way to make sure things are synchronously written to disk (local storage). On 5/3/06, Stefaan A Eeckels <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 02 May 2006 14:38:50 -0700 "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: need a better file copy method

2006-05-03 Thread Stefaan A Eeckels
On Tue, 02 May 2006 14:38:50 -0700 "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefaan A Eeckels wrote: > > On Mon, 01 May 2006 13:41:12 -0700 > > "Jim C." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Anyone know how a simple file copy can be accomplished in an > >> explicitly synchronous manner without adding