On Thu, Jan 20, 2000 at 03:10:28PM -0600, Michael Maloney wrote:
>
> How do they do this? Does the Sun JDK use green threads by
> default?
>
Yes.
BAPper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsu
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:47:18PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
>
> José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
>
> > The recommended minimum memory is 128MB! Is that really need? I have
> > only 64MB. Would it be worth downloading and experimenting? Is anybody
> > else using JBuilder under Linux with less tha
On Fri, Dec 17, 1999 at 01:26:56PM -0200, José Romildo Malaquias wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> > I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> > installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> > ok except for a
On Wed, Dec 15, 1999 at 04:40:47PM -0500, Alan Hazelton wrote:
> I've got a Redhat 6.1 system with the Blackdown JDK 1.2.2 RC3
> installed. I installed the Borland Jbuilder 3 foundation IDE. It runs
> ok except for a few little annoyances. One of which is the fact that
> the "Exit" item is miss
You could do almost the same thing nd possibly appease Sun at the same
time by setting up a system similar to how XFree86 is set up. Create
the "Blackdown Organization" who is able to sign NDAs and whatever
other legal crap that Sun requires. For those that want to help on
the port, they join th
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 06:28:29PM -0500, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> But it does matter how it was claimed. If the work was done by
> Inprise it is one thing, if it is only relabeling of Blackdown
> code, it is another.
I was speaking from a legal standpoint. According to Sun's brain-dead
license, the
On Tue, Dec 07, 1999 at 04:39:07PM -0500, Derek Glidden wrote:
>
> Not to dis you or your company's efforts, but if this is actually a
> "clean" implementation of the JDK straight from Sun sources and never
> having touched the Blackdown code, then I find the contents of
> jdk1.2.2/jre/README.lin
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 05:30:17PM -0500, Jacob Nikom wrote:
> Was HotSpot ported to Linux?
>
If it has been, it shouldn't manifest itself until JDK1.3.
BAPper
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of
On Mon, Nov 29, 1999 at 10:49:47PM -0200, Monoses Ioan wrote:
>
> I've just installed the RC2 built against glibc 2.1.2 and
> it always dumps core because of SIGILL (Illegal instruction).
> This is true for both a 2.2.5 and a 2.2.12 kernel on a RH6.0.
>
Chances are you are run
On Mon, Nov 01, 1999 at 10:37:02PM -, John Louis wrote:
> hi,
> I would like to know that JAVA MAIL API can run on linux or not?
>
Yup. I wrote a mail client that used IMAP with it. I never had time
to see about doing a local mailbox and POP support. It is all
straight forward 100% Java
On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 10:27:23AM -0400, berry wrote:
> Who are the individuals currently working on the port?
> Do they have a formal relationship with Sun?
>
I'm curious about that myself. I'm a beta user of JBuilder 4 and
would really like to fix problems I find with the JDK while using
JBu
I didn't notice anything about an Alpha port on the Blackdown page.
Is such a port in progress with anyone? I just signed the Sun
agreement and downloaded the sources today. I thought I would start
to familiarize myself with the code on the x86 platform to start with.
Though, the Blackdown diffs
On Mon, Sep 06, 1999 at 09:52:43PM -0400, Frank Apap wrote:
> What do you guys recommend for good and simple Java IDES for linux. I used
> to use the emacs java IDE but i cant remember the url to get it again. If
> someone knows it let me know.
>
You might send some email to the JBuilder team
13 matches
Mail list logo
