Jacob Nikom wrote:
>
> It looks like they forgot to connect it to the rest of the site -
> even search of their web site does not find it.
Odd, maybe some browser/script trickery messing it up???
When I connect to
http://java.sun.com/
It's right near the top; the first "Headline & Featu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> If I try to put a float into a double variable the last bits of the
> precision are total garbage !
You got a problem with 0's ??? :>
0.3 cannot be represented exactly in either float or double. When
the float gets extended to double precision it is
On Apr 30, 11:28am, Riyad Kalla wrote:
> Subject: ...
>
> Has anyone checked out the new STATUS page? oh wow... that
> kicks ass... well when its done atleast...
BRAVO!!!
(ie. Thanks guys!)
--
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://math.nist.gov/~BMiller/
On Apr 23, 12:09am, Chris Abbey wrote:
> Subject: Re: Sun/bashing
> At 11:24 AM 4/22/99 -0700, Paolo Ciccone wrote:
> >1) Sun pushed Java as a multiplatform language.
>
> Sun positioned Java as a language not bound to any realworld platform;
> and hence as being multiplatform capable.
[...]
Now,
On Apr 21, 9:55am, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject: RE: ...
> Well stated. I congratulate you on your directness
> and your level-headedness.
> ...
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Chris Abbey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Directness, sure, but level-headedness?
It seemed to me only slig
On Feb 24, 12:08am, John Goerzen wrote:
> Subject: Re: Hatred of 1.2 messages
> Gerald Gutierrez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I'm starting to get the feeling that many in this group are approaching
> > "when will 1.2 be out" messages with a very disheartening attitude that
> > will surely tur
On Feb 16, 10:14am, Nathan Meyers wrote:
> Subject: Re: JDK 1.2 Snapshots???
> Tony Pujals wrote:
> > (If this issue has already been discussed, then I apologize in advance for
> > not researching the archives.)
>
> The issue has been discussed extensively... see the archives. Cardinal rule
#1
> o
Hi all;
Would the problem with jdk 1.1.7 and glibc-2.0.1xx be solved simply by
re-make-ing the system? This has solved some other similar problems for me.
(or does extensive, painful, testing have to be done?)
If it's simple -- and assuming jdk 1.2 isn't right around the corner -- would
it be
SABYASACHI S GUPTA wrote:
>
> I dont know this might be something very simple...
> so please excuse me.
>
> I have the following small code.
>
> public class saby {
>
> public static void main(String args[])
> {
>
> String s = "myclass";
> Class
