Re: 1.2 & threads

Oh, nevermind. I found the known bugs page and this falls under the "AWT programs exit immediately" problem. - cls -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTEC

1.2 & threads

I'm using the 1.2pre1 release on a RH6.0 system. I started developing this app that uses Swing under NT using Java Workshop 3.0 with Sun's 1.2 release. I tried running the app under Linux and it immediately exits. I don't explicitly create any threads in main() (just the main window) and the pr

Re: JDK1.2 : I am lost

On Thu, 13 May 1999, ALLEON Guillaume wrote: > "Alexander V. Konstantinou" wrote: > > > I have not tried it, but if I recall correctly from the conversations > > I read, JDK1.2 pre1 will work with glibc2.1 if you turn the JIT off > > and select green threads. > /usr/local/jdk1.2/jre/lib/i386/lib

Re: Does JDK 1.2 work with RH 6.0

On Wed, 5 May 1999, Al wrote: > I am going to upgrade to Red Hat 6.0 and I was wondering if JDK 1.2 > work with Red Hat 6.0? The current glibc 2.0 release of JDK 1.2 works if you use green threads and the option -Djava.compiler=NONE. > Does any JDK work with RH 6.0? There are glibc 2.1.x bu

Re: Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

On Tue, 4 May 1999, Tom McMichael wrote: > Is there a reason why you haven't tried jdk117_v2 with glibc 2.1.1. > I'm using it on my RH 6.0 install and it works great (using with > swing and JDBC). Because I've been sitting on this tarball a week waiting for a response from sbb. Looking at the m

Glibc 2.1.x jdk 1.1.6v5 available

An _unofficial_ version 1.1.6v5 compiled against glibc 2.1.1 pre1 is available at http://www.seawood.org/java/ . Try to be gentle. If someone could mirror it or bless it and put it with the official releases to be mirrored, my provider would be grateful. :) Details. It was built on a Red Hat

Re: JDK1.1.6v4a can't find library libXp.so.6

On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Wim Ceulemans wrote: > If I try to install the main XFree86 package (XFree86-3_3_2-1_i386.rpm) I > get a message saying: > > pam > 0.59 is needed > Ok, I talked to Mike Wangsmo at RedHat and it looks as though there are problems with the updates directory. He said that thi

Re: JDK1.1.6v4a can't find library libXp.so.6

On Wed, 9 Sep 1998, Wim Ceulemans wrote: > Thanks for the information. I have my jdk1.1.6v4a running under RedHat4.2 > The library libXp is in XFree86-libs-3_3_3-2-1_i386.rpm. > > One problem though. Since I installed XFree86 3.3.2 (I installed all the > updates) my X server won't start as a reg

Re: JDK1.1.6v4a can't find library libXp.so.6

On Tue, 8 Sep 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > | --- > | In message , [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > | > | I have the same setup as Wim does (RedHat4.2) and encounter the > | same problems: can't load library libXp.so.6 . > | > | For now, you want to grab the .tar.gz

Re: Cannot run java

On Fri, 24 Jul 1998, Clarence Johnson wrote: > When trying to run java, we receive the following message: > /usr/jdk1.1.6/bin/../bin/i586/green_threads/java: No such file or > directory > > That file does exist in that directory and permissions are not an issue. Make sure that you are using th

Re: Linux/Java/KDE

On Tue, 21 Jul 1998, Seth M. Landsman wrote: > Because of the restrictions placed by javasoft on the jdk source > code, I don't think porting the jdk to QT could ever be considered free > enough to fit QT's standards. i.e., source code could never be released, > save to those who signed t

Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2

On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, B. Craig Taverner wrote: > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > Is it not possible for blackdown to distribute a lesstif version of the > jdk? I for one would be in

Re: Trying to use LessTif with jdk1.1.6-v2

On Thu, 9 Jul 1998, Gernot Koller wrote: > Quoting Peter Ziobrzynski ([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > > > > You have to rebuild JDK with LessTif. Attempts to run JDK binaries linked with > > Motif against LessTif result in cores. I tried it myself. > > I have good results after rebuilding. Here is my she

Re: Where'd Java-Linux.org go?

On Wed, 1 Jul 1998, Marcus Johnson wrote: > Yes, yes, but will someone answer the question? What is the history here? I'm not sure why it matters but the brief and possibly incorrect story is this: Some people thought that linux-jdk should have it's own domain. They asked Karl, maintainer of Bl

Re: Installation problem

On Fri, 19 Jun 1998 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I downloaded the JDK1.1.6v1(glibc) and installed on my Red Hat Linux 5.0. > But when I try to compile the "HelloWorld " program: > ls -l /lib/libc.so.* gives me > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root > 13 Jan 20 10:39 /lib/libc.so.6 -> libc-2.0.

Re: 116v2-glibc problems

On Fri, 19 Jun 1998, Louis-David Mitterrand wrote: > After trying out the 116v2-glibc there seems to be two issues: > > - you can't load a native library if it is outside of > $JDK_HOME/lib/i586/green_threads, It works fine for me. Make sure that the directory containing your native librarie

glibc v2-test 1.1 ready

No sooner than I sent out the first notice than I received a message from one of the libc maintainers. There was indeed a bug in the getlocalhost code wrt glibc. The fixed version is at http://www.seawood.org/java/getlocalhost2.c for the curious. The new tarballs are at http://www.seawood.or

glibc v2-test ready

The jdk1.1.6 v2-test1 files are available at http://www.seawood.org/java/. It does not fix the InetAddr.getLocalHost() problem as that problem seems to be a general glibc problem. See http://www-gnats.gnu.org:8080/cgi-bin/wwwgnats.pl/full/667 for details. As a workaround for that problem, eit

Re: InetAddr.getLocalHost() [glibc?] bug workaround

On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Marc Evelyn wrote: > On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Christopher Seawood wrote: > > # Yes, this does seem to be a glibc bug. The attached code is the gist of > # getLocalHost(). It returns the correct result on my machine at work > # running glibc 2.0.6 but re

Re: Linux native threads

On Fri, 5 Jun 1998, Bernd Kreimeier wrote: > > The current FAQ quotes Karl Asha: native pthreads > with Linux are far from being available for JDK. > > Is this still true? The scripts contain lines like For the blackdown version it is. I think Sergey Nikitin's version might have native thread

Re: installation problem

On Mon, 1 Jun 1998, Kiran Josyula wrote: > I have downloaded and then extraced the following files > 1. i18n-v7-glibc.tar.gz > 2. jdk-1.1.5-v7-glibc.tar.gz... > ldconfig: version 1.7.14 > libc.so.5 => libc.so.5.3.12 You downloaded the glibc (libc6) binaries and you are running a libc5

Re: im sure this question has been asked before but...

On Thu, 28 May 1998, Steve Byrne wrote: > I think it would be an amazingly cool and good thing to have a GTK based AWT. You should talk to Doug South <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>. From previous talks with him, it appears as though he's made pretty good headway on a GTK AWT. - cls

1.1.6 glibc v1-test now available

I finally got a chance to build this. It's based upon Byrne's 1.1.6 diffs. It hasn't been tested much but it works for the java apps I use. You can grab it from: http://www.seawood.org/java/ - cls

Re: Java Plug-in tantalizing, but...

On Mon, 18 May 1998, Robert Coie wrote: > > Are you running the requird library revisions listed on the documentation > > page? > > I believe so, although the glibc instructions appeared to be > RedHat-specific. I am using the latest final candidate library for > Debian 2.0, which claims to be

Re: JDK 1.1.5v7 by Steve Byrne

On Mon, 18 May 1998, Dieter Nützel wrote: > can you please remove the 'libXm.so.1' link from your latest glibc > JDK1.1.5v7 port (java_dyn)? I don't think that will be possible. The Motif shared libs I used to build jdk have libname.so.1 hardcoded as the soname. The glibc jdk was linked agains

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

On Tue, 12 May 1998, Andy Stubbs wrote: > As it happens, it isn't actually there; it's in the updates directory for > RH 5.0. BUT... I can't work out why jdk1.1.5 is linked against a version > of glibc2 which doesn't appear to exist in anything other than .rpm format > and isn't even at the gnu f

Re: glibc2/jdk1.1.5v7

On Tue, 12 May 1998, charles verge wrote: > I belive glibc2.0.7-7 is in the > ftp://ftp.redhat.com/pub/contirb/hurricane/i386 > > I would check but I am useing MacOS (not mine) and it is so messed up > that I can no connect to some servers on the internet. Actually, the glibc 2.0.7-7 of which