Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2)

1999-01-14 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
on 13/01/99 22:43:24 Please respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Dirk Vanhalle) Subject: Re: JCK licensing restriction (was: JDK1.2) I disagree on that last point, and I was wondering if anyone else feels the same. (I'm referring to the part about not releasing any

Re: jdk 1.2

1999-01-08 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
Hi. Just stay tuned to this list. We're all waiting quite anxiously. I'm confident that you will receive plenty of messages as soon as the new JDK is available for download. Let's give those porters a chance to complete their work and release a stable product ! Be patient. Dirk.

Searching RPM for JDK 1.1.6 libc5

1998-09-02 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
Hi Sorry if this is has been asked before. Is there a RPM for JDK 1.1.6 (sbb), libc 5 version available ? I tried RedHat, but there seems to be only a glibc version or a 1.1.5 RPM. Did I overlook something ? Thanks, Dirk.

Re: compilation troubles with tya07 + jdk1.1.6v2

1998-08-20 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
Hi, You might want to try 'ftp://gonzalez.cyberus.ca/pub/Linux/java/tya1.0.tgz' I think it is the main site for tya. Cheers, Dirk.

Re: Bitwise operators

1998-08-04 Thread Dirk Vanhalle
Actually, they all make sense. It's plain 2's complement binary arithmatic. First of all, 0xF0F0F0F0 is a negative (signed) integer number. So assigning it to a long makes it 0xF0F0F0F0L. This accounts for the fact that all 1's are shifted in when you shift right, even if you use '>>>'.

subscrib

1998-06-08 Thread Dirk Vanhalle