Re: Version snag

1999-10-25 Thread Hartnett
I do have a 117 but that is configured under a different user account. As I mentioned earlier it won't even allow the install unless it is 1.2. I'll look into things further when I have the chance. Thanks, Sean On Mon, 25 Oct 199

Re: Version snag

1999-10-25 Thread Hartnett
This same package was installed on Solaris and its runtime and works fine. This group seems to be quick to jump on someone if it is not JAVA Linux related in someone's opinion. I am running Blackdown JAVA 2 on Red Hat Linux 6, that sounds like this group to me. I don't see what the problem is?

Version snag

1999-10-25 Thread Hartnett
Ran into a surprise snag when trying to test an app my company has made that requires JAVA 2 to install and run. I was told the program on install would check to make sure the JDK was version 2, just to make sure I first tried to install it under 1.1.7 and as told, it refused to install. I inst

Re: Runtime problems

1999-09-28 Thread Hartnett
stall. Sean On Mon, 27 Sep 1999 19:54:25 -0700, dave madden wrote: > =>From: "Hartnett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > =>... > =>"/usr/jdk117/bin/../bin/checkVersions: /tmp/ldd.out.858" Permission denied" > >Do you know why you&#x

Runtime problems

1999-09-27 Thread Hartnett
Currently I am trying to get JDK 1.1.7 running on my system, but obviously since I am posting this am having some problems. I'll try 1.2 after getting 1.1.7 running correctly. How is the 1.2 package anyway? I've got a fresh install of Red Hat 6.0, I've tried both the i386 glibc and libc5 v1a ve